Jump to content
MarreZ

Madeleine Mccann Missing Girl

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, MONKMAN said:

They're guilty of neglect, that is without dispute but there is no credible shred of evidence to suggest the McCann's killed their child and disposed of the body.

 

10 hours ago, hearthammer said:

Cadaver dugs don't lie 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Gaz FFC said:

 

 

I said evidence. 

 

12 minutes ago, Bigmouth Strikes Again said:

FFS do you want the hundreds of specific links posted individually on here?

Yes please. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, MONKMAN said:

 


Are you one of the morons who believe the attacks were orchestrated by the US government? If so, some evidence would be nice.

 

Haven't you even heard of Youtube? Alex Jones? A flat Earth? Crisis actors? Where have you fucking been?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, MONKMAN said:

 

It's my opinion that people who think the McCann's were directly 'responsible for and covered up the disappearance' of their child, are complete fucking morons.

They're guilty of neglect, that is without dispute but there is no credible shred of evidence to suggest the McCann's killed their child and disposed of the body.

Off topic, do you believe that the 9/11 attacks were orchestrated by the US government??

There is as much evidence of her kidnapping as there is of her parents covering up her death, but one theory gets millions spent on it while the other is dismisses everytime for reasons unknown

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There is as much evidence of her kidnapping as there is of her parents covering up her death, but one theory gets millions spent on it while the other is dismisses everytime for reasons unknown
No, there's not.

There was just no way for them to do it in the verifiable timeframes. The idea that they killed her then kept her in a fridge whilst the world's media were outside charging at them whenever they appeared and then sneaked out to the church with the fridge to cremate her is the best that the police or anyone else could come up with (funnily enough, something that the corrupt police force come up with in a nearby case just before...).

It's very easy to read into every spec of body language and find inconsistencies in human testimony but the reality is it's just simply far more likely she was taken by someone and/or wandered off in the very large time frame that the premises, next to a road and with limited sight lines from elsewhere, was left unsecured.

The whole PR thing is the advice they were given by world leading experts in the field and anybody who thinks that their attempt to raise money or attention is an implication of guilt is utterly retarded. Their status and personal capabilities gave them advantage and they've used that, anybody else would and there's nothing unusual about that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, harry94 said:

No, there's not.

There was just no way for them to do it in the verifiable timeframes. The idea that they killed her then kept her in a fridge whilst the world's media were outside charging at them whenever they appeared and then sneaked out to the church with the fridge to cremate her is the best that the police or anyone else could come up with (funnily enough, something that the corrupt police force come up with in a nearby case just before...).

It's very easy to read into every spec of body language and find inconsistencies in human testimony but the reality is it's just simply far more likely she was taken by someone and/or wandered off in the very large time frame that the premises, next to a road and with limited sight lines from elsewhere, was left unsecured.

The whole PR thing is the advice they were given by world leading experts in the field and anybody who thinks that their attempt to raise money or attention is an implication of guilt is utterly retarded. Their status and personal capabilities gave them advantage and they've used that, anybody else would and there's nothing unusual about that.

Hard to argue with any of that but I still think the fact that I don't like them should count for something.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No, there's not.

There was just no way for them to do it in the verifiable timeframes. The idea that they killed her then kept her in a fridge whilst the world's media were outside charging at them whenever they appeared and then sneaked out to the church with the fridge to cremate her is the best that the police or anyone else could come up with (funnily enough, something that the corrupt police force come up with in a nearby case just before...).

It's very easy to read into every spec of body language and find inconsistencies in human testimony but the reality is it's just simply far more likely she was taken by someone and/or wandered off in the very large time frame that the premises, next to a road and with limited sight lines from elsewhere, was left unsecured.

The whole PR thing is the advice they were given by world leading experts in the field and anybody who thinks that their attempt to raise money or attention is an implication of guilt is utterly retarded. Their status and personal capabilities gave them advantage and they've used that, anybody else would and there's nothing unusual about that.


I think the bigger implication of guilt is that the Portuguese (and I think some British police) thought that they did it.

I don’t know if they did/didn’t do it or have an opinion on what happened but there’s more implicating them than their PR machine or conspiracy theories.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, harry94 said:

No, there's not.

There was just no way for them to do it in the verifiable timeframes. The idea that they killed her then kept her in a fridge whilst the world's media were outside charging at them whenever they appeared and then sneaked out to the church with the fridge to cremate her is the best that the police or anyone else could come up with (funnily enough, something that the corrupt police force come up with in a nearby case just before...).

It's very easy to read into every spec of body language and find inconsistencies in human testimony but the reality is it's just simply far more likely she was taken by someone and/or wandered off in the very large time frame that the premises, next to a road and with limited sight lines from elsewhere, was left unsecured.

The whole PR thing is the advice they were given by world leading experts in the field and anybody who thinks that their attempt to raise money or attention is an implication of guilt is utterly retarded. Their status and personal capabilities gave them advantage and they've used that, anybody else would and there's nothing unusual about that.

No one seen maddie since the wee excursion thing or  whatever during the day, she could have been done away with long before the tapas crew sat down at their table and her bed made up to look like she was there

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really don’t like Scouse accents and Gerry looks a wrong un and has been sleeping with a Scouse. That makes it easier for me to believe they are guilty.

That said, that curly-haired female Portuguese reporter on the TV series has some bonkers ideas about things that show guilt. She was a fruit loop.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Bigmouth Strikes Again said:

Get up off your arse and do it yourself, rather than spouting pish on here.

Thank you.

Always a good laugh when a moron comes out with some bonkers claim, then can’t be arsed to even attempt to defend it with a single piece of evidence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Honest_Man#1 said:

Always a good laugh when a moron comes out with some bonkers claim, then can’t be arsed to even attempt to defend it with a single piece of evidence.

2014 and Better Together must've been brilliant for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Gaz FFC said:

2014 and Better Together must've been brilliant for you.

If other morons hadn’t bought the unsubstantiated claims (lies) then it would have been great. Unfortunately, like the morons who fail to provide any evidence, there are similar morons who don’t feel the need to see evidence to believe the shite others have came out with.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Jambomo said:

 


I think the bigger implication of guilt is that the Portuguese (and I think some British police) thought that they did it.

I don’t know if they did/didn’t do it or have an opinion on what happened but there’s more implicating them than their PR machine or conspiracy theories.

 

Aye but on that basis it must have been a collaboration between the parents, Robert Murat, every paedophile in the area, etc, etc - as they were all suspected at some point. Bit of critical thinking please?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The parents are planning to drag this out until she's old enough to qualify for a pension, which they will then blow on games of bingo and scratch cards.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...