Jump to content
MarreZ

Madeleine Mccann Missing Girl

Recommended Posts

On 4/8/2019 at 21:37, Crawford Bridge said:

That Kennedy and his laddy are a pair of creeps.

Thank feck he never got to buy Hibs, would probably pronounce it as "Heebs".

Well sick is pronounced seek, seems reasonable to call them heebs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, BillyAnchor said:

Well sick is pronounced seek, seems reasonable to call them heebs.

I have no idea what you're on about.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm 100% positive the McCann's are responsible for their kid's death and subsequent disappearance. How, I'm not so sure about but that's neither here nor there. I don't like them, which is all the proof that anybody should need.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm 100% positive the McCann's are responsible for their kid's death and subsequent disappearance. How, I'm not so sure about but that's neither here nor there. I don't like them, which is all the proof that anybody should need.



Hello Gonçalo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, dundeefc1783 said:

 


Hello Gonçalo

 

Olá

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Iv finally caught up with the Netflix documentary, i dont think the McCanns killed her or sold her etc, however they are still to blame, ill never understand leaving a child/children unattended while you go for dinner! 

The question I have is relating to the Tanner sighting, she was with the McCanns and was checking the kids, sees a guy carrying a child with the same jammies on and doesnt think, ill stick my head make sure they are ok?? 

Kennedy's son was a proper dick, clearly never did a real days work in his life, running about with the private investigater guy thinking he is James Bond

Amaral was also a dodgy b*****d! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm 100% positive the McCann's are responsible for their kid's death and subsequent disappearance. How, I'm not so sure about but that's neither here nor there. I don't like them, which is all the proof that anybody should need.


Your tears and emotions say more than real facts ever could.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Netflix TV programmes,  are just a rehash of the same misinformation coming out of the McCann camp since the 5th of May 2007. That date is significant because it was the day that the British media started to report negatively on what the Portuguese were doing. It was also the day that the Portuguese Police started to ask awkward questions about what had happened.

Paolo Reis has recently published a book on the subject of how the case has been covered in Britain. 
https://themccannswar.blogspot.com/

The same central themes have come out of the McCann camp for 12 years, Reis exposes them for the lies that they are. The book is not an attempt to solve the case, as such, merely to question why the McCanns have been so proactive in closing down and smearing any dissent from their version of events.

Reading the press recently I've noticed the following constants: there was no neglect; the Portuguese police were incompetent; Amaral is corrupt; the evidence of the dogs is unreliable; the DNA test is inconclusive; anyone who disagrees with the McCanns is doing it out of spite; the abduction theory is the only legitimate theory; the McCanns have been ruled out as suspects.

Usually the stories come from "a friend of the family", and there is rarely any checking of that source's information. Thus we are subjected to ever more fanciful theories as to what has happened. All despite the only evidence that there was an abduction is the word of the parents, and they have been shown to have lied and changed their story as awkward questions started to be asked.

What is shocking is that in just about every piece of false information printed by our press, there is evidence to show that it is an utter crock. Taking one example, the fallacy that the case is closed in Portugal and the parents are not suspects. This is in direct contradiction to the hypothesis put forward by the Policia Judicial, namely that the child died in an accident, and that the parents staged an abduction.

This hypothesis was explored in a book by Goncalo Amaral, he was sued for defamation by the McCanns, and they lost.  The supreme court in Lisbon made it clear that the case was still open and both parents had not been excused.

However, Operation Grange, funded by the British Taxpayer, has spent the last 7 years, trying to solve the case, with one hand tied behind their back. Namely that the possibility that the parents were involved is to be ignored, and only two lines of enquiry are to be pursued: that Madeleine wandered off, and died but has never been fund; or, that she was taken by an abductor.

Anybody wanting to get a handle on the case from an unbiased, objective, evidence based point of view would do well to have a look at "The McCann's War", by Paolo Reis. It is very readable, and is not without the odd bit of sly, Portuguese humour. I'd like to add, I have no connection to Paolo Reis, or the publisher, I am just one of the many people who follow the case, stunned by the apparent cover up that is taking place.

Edit: just had a read through some of the replies to this thread, and I have just remembered another constant theme from Team McCann. Namely that the Algarve is some kind of Thailand of the West, where sexual perverts can indulge their desires without any check from law and order. There is a constant lie about lack of laws on paedophilia that is particularly sickening, and forms part of a sinister and selfish attempt by that pair to smear an entire nation, as well as destroy individuals who stand in their way.

Edited by Alternative Title

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What if Madeline McCann is related to Neil McCann and she’s actually Darren O’Dea?

Or more likely, Jack Hamilton.

 

Edited by Melanius Mullarkey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Alternative Title said:

Edit: just had a read through some of the replies to this thread, and I have just remembered another constant theme from Team McCann. Namely that the Algarve is some kind of Thailand of the West, where sexual perverts can indulge their desires without any check from law and order.

Did they know this before they took their kids there?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, GordonD said:

Did they know this before they took their kids there?

As it is not true, I doubt it.  However, they have had the cheek to say they should have been warned anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
First post on this one, yes. What is your point?
^^^ Jim Gamble

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Sergeant Wilson said:

https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/madeleine-mccann-detective-says-case-16164564

Little does he know the case will be solved by Scottish football supporters with nothing better to do.

Who said anything about solving the case? The whole point is to question what you are told in the press. 

3 minutes ago, Principal Flutie said:

Joining a football forum to post about Madeleine McCann. :lol:

Now I have joined, I may well take part in other discussions, but it was this topic that made me want to become a member. If that makes my contribution any less valid, I apologise.

Just now, Romeo said:
52 minutes ago, Alternative Title said:
First post on this one, yes. What is your point?

^^^ Jim Gamble

Jim Gamble is part of the problem, mate, although he seems to be doing a bit of backtracking these days.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, Principal Flutie said:

Joining a football forum to post about Madeleine McCann. :lol:

surely that is testament to the level of debate. I find myself reading the politics threads on here more than the football threads now - although the same posters tend to populate the same threads, I find some of the football threads (Premier League for example) unbearable due to the level of (repetitive) contributions. I know this argument could be applied to many threads, I tend to fine it isn't as bad on non football threads. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Joining a football forum to post about Madeleine McCann. :lol:


As opposed to joining it to be the most obnoxious odious arsehole on the entire forum?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, Alternative Title said:

Who said anything about solving the case? The whole point is to question what you are told in the press. 

Now I have joined, I may well take part in other discussions, but it was this topic that made me want to become a member. If that makes my contribution any less valid, I apologise.

Jim Gamble is part of the problem, mate, although he seems to be doing a bit of backtracking these days.

...and I didn't  mention your TLDR contribution.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...