mrcat1990 Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 It seems as soon as the case is gone and all public interest has died the McCanns appear on another media campaign. Snooze. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T_S_A_R Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 Might as well ask this again, since I didn't get an answer last time. Why would the media do this? In 2007 it was a great story and the public are very interested. In 2013 they are on their best behaviour due to leveson 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paranoid android Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 In 2007 it was a great story and the public are very interested. In 2013 they are on their best behaviour due to leveson Aye, but why would the press go out of their way to give the McCanns positive press - six years later? And what do the McCanns give in return? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T_S_A_R Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 Aye, but why would the press go out of their way to give the McCanns positive press - six years later? And what do the McCanns give in return? Giving the mccann's positive press is all about acting nice to try and make it look as though they are capable of self regulation or desering of a light handed royal charter. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YassinMoutaouakil Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 Aye, but why would the press go out of their way to give the McCanns positive press - six years later? And what do the McCanns give in return? There's an interesting piece I read a while ago that attempts to explain it. There's a name for it, Missing White Girl syndrome or something. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kev23 Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 It was probably in the loft. Either that or Maddie is still in the corner of the room with a lampshade on her head. :lol: 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philomena McCann Posted October 24, 2013 Share Posted October 24, 2013 A whole fuckin week undercover in a bloody gypsy camp for nothing. Ahm well pissed off. Everything wis goin great until I tried to dae an impromptu DNA test on wee Rosella. Still, that's me soarted fur pegs for a while and ah goat them tae stick a curse on that hoor Kate so no a total waste. That bitch has ruined oor Gerry. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cracowjambo Posted October 25, 2013 Share Posted October 25, 2013 A whole fuckin week undercover in a bloody gypsy camp for nothing. Ahm well pissed off. Everything wis goin great until I tried to dae an impromptu DNA test on wee Rosella. Still, that's me soarted fur pegs for a while and ah goat them tae stick a curse on that hoor Kate so no a total waste. That bitch has ruined oor Gerry. Eh? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Syd Barrett Posted October 25, 2013 Share Posted October 25, 2013 Eh? A weirdo troll who thinks he's funny. Best ignored. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cracowjambo Posted October 25, 2013 Share Posted October 25, 2013 A weirdo troll who thinks he's funny. Best ignored. If only he came up with standing in the corner with a lampshade on her head that was funny. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
captain kirk Posted October 25, 2013 Share Posted October 25, 2013 (edited) The Portuguese are fuckin sick to death of the Mccanns , they are in no doubt she died in the apartment ,,,dogs don't lie, the cadaver dogs found the scent of a body in the apartment . This story of her being snatched is guff, if she was being watched by somebody then surely they would have struck right after gerry checked her at 8.30 ,that would give the most time to bolt before the next check ,,,,but no,,they waited an hour just moments before the next check and took her!!? Ma baws http://www.cwporter.com/mccann.htm Edited October 25, 2013 by captain kirk 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Half Rice Half Chips Posted October 25, 2013 Share Posted October 25, 2013 The Portuguese are fuckin sick to death of the Mccanns , they are in no doubt she died in the apartment ,,,dogs don't lie, the cadaver dogs found the scent of a body in the apartment . This story of her being snatched is guff, if she was being watched by somebody then surely they would have struck right after gerry checked her at 8.30 ,that would give the most time to bolt before the next check ,,,,but no,,they waited an hour just moments before the next check and took her!!? Ma baws http://www.cwporter.com/mccann.htm Do you think one of the McCanns killed her (accidentally or otherwise) in the apartment and staged an elaborate abduction story to cover themselves? I'll concede that theoretically that scenario is possible but why are the Mc Canns still pushing the case so hard, getting Scotland Yard on the case etc? Surely if they were guilty but found themselves in the clear they'd want to let sleeping dogs lie? (pardon the pun) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTChris Posted October 25, 2013 Share Posted October 25, 2013 Is it worth reading the link to some weirdo Holocaust denier? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotThePars Posted October 25, 2013 Share Posted October 25, 2013 Nah, I've got to the first reason and it's fucking boring. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DomDom Posted October 25, 2013 Share Posted October 25, 2013 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hearts Daft Posted October 25, 2013 Share Posted October 25, 2013 (edited) Aye, but why would the press go out of their way to give the McCanns positive press - six years later? And what do the McCanns give in return?The McCanns are libel lawyered up to the eyeballs. That's why. Edited October 25, 2013 by Hearts Daft 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hearts Daft Posted October 25, 2013 Share Posted October 25, 2013 (edited) Do you think one of the McCanns killed her (accidentally or otherwise) in the apartment and staged an elaborate abduction story to cover themselves? I'll concede that theoretically that scenario is possible but why are the Mc Canns still pushing the case so hard, getting Scotland Yard on the case etc? Surely if they were guilty but found themselves in the clear they'd want to let sleeping dogs lie? (pardon the pun) The scent was on Kate's clothes and in the boot of her rented car and the boot had Maddies DNA in it. IIRC. Edited October 25, 2013 by Hearts Daft 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeo Posted October 25, 2013 Share Posted October 25, 2013 Do you think one of the McCanns killed her (accidentally or otherwise) in the apartment and staged an elaborate abduction story to cover themselves? I'll concede that theoretically that scenario is possible but why are the Mc Canns still pushing the case so hard, getting Scotland Yard on the case etc? Surely if they were guilty but found themselves in the clear they'd want to let sleeping dogs lie? (pardon the pun) Elaborate?.....someone opened the window and took our daughter, not exactly Lex Luthor like in it's complexity. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harry94 Posted October 25, 2013 Share Posted October 25, 2013 (edited) Do you think one of the McCanns killed her (accidentally or otherwise) in the apartment and staged an elaborate abduction story to cover themselves? I'll concede that theoretically that scenario is possible but why are the Mc Canns still pushing the case so hard, getting Scotland Yard on the case etc? Surely if they were guilty but found themselves in the clear they'd want to let sleeping dogs lie? (pardon the pun) The biggest issue with the McCann accident theory is that there is such a small window of time for everything to have happened in. If your daughter dies then I doubt you would be able to attend a meal and act as normal as they were behaving. So then you would have to assume that one of the parents had twenty minutes to dispose of the body which would have been hidden so well that it has never been found. On top of this you have to swear seven others to total secrecy and form a consistent alibi with them (which it was essentially despite what could be seen as some human recall errors). Then you have the witness statements of eleven workers that more or less confirm that. I find it quite hard to believe they could have pulled it off. Edited October 25, 2013 by harry94 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Half Rice Half Chips Posted October 25, 2013 Share Posted October 25, 2013 Elaborate?.....someone opened the window and took our daughter, not exactly Lex Luthor like in it's complexity. Aye but making up fake timelines, staging bogus half hourly checks, getting accomplices to make up fake sightings of non-existent men carrying a child, all of that would be quite elaborate. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.