Jump to content

Petty Things That Get On Your Nerves...


Recommended Posts

On 12/12/2022 at 12:22, Sergeant Wilson said:

I'd say the biggest problem in Glasgow city centre, is not enough people live there. Workers will come and go, albeit in smaller numbers. But if more people lived there shops and pubs etc would be busy with residents. An effort to have affordable housing replacing redundant commercial space might solve the over and under provision of each type of property.

While it’s an interesting idea, the demographics are wrong. In the City Center, the weekday/working hours people support a totally different business and service ecology than 24/7 residents support, especially if you focus on the affordable housing. For affordable housing you need to locate in an area that is not within a food desert (and lovely term, designating a locale with no supermarket or similar grocery store within a reasonable distance) and that allows for the provision of social services (often required in affordable living demos) within a short distance. You also need employment, and while some of that would come hand in hand with the developments associated with the new residents, that wouldn’t be sufficient. Then you have the lack of transportation service outside “conventional” hours, where many people in affordable housing have jobs with non-conventional hours.

The more successful developments recently have tended to be more boutique, with a shopping cluster co-located with housing, but the housing has been for the upper middle and lower upper class, generally, as they also have the income to support the development overall. The provision of the core customer base encourages stores and businesses to locate in the area, which then results in more custom from people from outside the immediate area due to variety, however, this also results in a business mix skewed toward a more affluent clientele.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, TxRover said:

While it’s an interesting idea, the demographics are wrong. In the City Center, the weekday/working hours people support a totally different business and service ecology than 24/7 residents support, especially if you focus on the affordable housing. For affordable housing you need to locate in an area that is not within a food desert (and lovely term, designating a locale with no supermarket or similar grocery store within a reasonable distance) and that allows for the provision of social services (often required in affordable living demos) within a short distance. You also need employment, and while some of that would come hand in hand with the developments associated with the new residents, that wouldn’t be sufficient. Then you have the lack of transportation service outside “conventional” hours, where many people in affordable housing have jobs with non-conventional hours.

The more successful developments recently have tended to be more boutique, with a shopping cluster co-located with housing, but the housing has been for the upper middle and lower upper class, generally, as they also have the income to support the development overall. The provision of the core customer base encourages stores and businesses to locate in the area, which then results in more custom from people from outside the immediate area due to variety, however, this also results in a business mix skewed toward a more affluent clientele.

You haven't been to Methil recently have you? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, scottsdad said:

At work today. Nobody at home, and Evri have sent a picture of a parcel they delivered. Sitting on the front doorstep.

99% chance of it being nicked before anyone gets home.

Assuming the driver himself didn't lift it straight after he took the photo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, scottsdad said:

At work today. Nobody at home, and Evri have sent a picture of a parcel they delivered. Sitting on the front doorstep.

99% chance of it being nicked before anyone gets home.

Hermes had a habit of flinging stuff into my garden without trying the door regardless of the weather then fucking off.

Edited by Richey Edwards
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Richey Edwards said:

Hermes had a habit of flinging stuff into my garden without trying the door regardless of the weather then fucking off.

I had a guy leaving a parcel on the ground outside our unlocked shed door in the pouring rain. Thing about all these delivery companies is that it's more about the individual worker than the firm they're employed by, it's worth complaining if you get an arsehole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, welshbairn said:

I had a guy leaving a parcel on the ground outside our unlocked shed door in the pouring rain. Thing about all these delivery companies is that it's more about the individual worker than the firm they're employed by, it's worth complaining if you get an arsehole.

They left a cardboard box around the back in the wind and pissing rain. I was at work, so the box had disintegrated by the time I was back. The front porch is sheltered, they could have at least sat it there out of the rain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...