lokforever Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killiepiyo Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firepit Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 So seems not so clear as everyone thought . if they have checked with the cup organisers and parent club then Talbot may have a case here 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
passbackdave Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 New club name for use auchinleck fans, Amateur talbot lol Mon the papers 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
passbackdave Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 1 minute ago, Firepit said: So seems not so clear as everyone thought . if they have checked with the cup organisers and parent club then Talbot may have a case here Clyde is parent club and he played for clydebank in the cup game. If they asked us then am sure we wouldve told them aye he played for us v pollok in previous round that means hes cup tied but cant imagine clyde knowing wit cup or league games he plays in tbh. Mon the papers 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firepit Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 38 minutes ago, passbackdave said: Clyde is parent club and he played for clydebank in the cup game. If they asked us then am sure we wouldve told them aye he played for us v pollok in previous round that means hes cup tied but cant imagine clyde knowing wit cup or league games he plays in tbh. Mon the papers So the parent club don’t keep a record of when their player plays in a cup match ??? Are you being serious here 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimbaxters Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 38 minutes ago, passbackdave said: Clyde is parent club and he played for clydebank in the cup game. If they asked us then am sure we wouldve told them aye he played for us v pollok in previous round that means hes cup tied but cant imagine clyde knowing wit cup or league games he plays in tbh. Mon the papers Did you read the statement from Talbot? They didn't ask Clydebank. They seem to have taken the Competition Organisers at their word. Is not not how Buffs got away with their misdemeanour earier in the season? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Botlad67 Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 Shambles from our part , potentially done boys out of a medal. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craigkillie Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 1 minute ago, Firepit said: So the parent club don’t keep a record of when their player plays in a cup match ??? Are you being serious here Why would they? Clyde aren't involved in the South Challenge Cup, it has absolutely no bearing on them whether or not one of their on-loan players plays in it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimbaxters Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 Another interesting, although arguably irrelevant point is how EK seemed to know instantly about this after the final whistle? Did they know before and kept schtum until the lost the match or were they told by someone in attendance at this point? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy25 Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 1 minute ago, jimbaxters said: Another interesting, although arguably irrelevant point is how EK seemed to know instantly about this after the final whistle? Did they know before and kept schtum until the lost the match or were they told by someone in attendance at this point? One of their players was also on loan to Clydebank and played in same game. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firepit Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 3 minutes ago, jimbaxters said: Another interesting, although arguably irrelevant point is how EK seemed to know instantly about this after the final whistle? Did they know before and kept schtum until the lost the match or were they told by someone in attendance at this point? It wouldn’t surprise me tbh 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firepit Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 13 minutes ago, craigkillie said: Why would they? Clyde aren't involved in the South Challenge Cup, it has absolutely no bearing on them whether or not one of their on-loan players plays in it. Whether it has an effect or not it would be proper governance to know exactly the status of all players under your employment . 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FairWeatherFan Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 8 minutes ago, jimbaxters said: Another interesting, although arguably irrelevant point is how EK seemed to know instantly about this after the final whistle? Did they know before and kept schtum until the lost the match or were they told by someone in attendance at this point? Someone on Twitter jumped on it once the teamsheets were out. Wasn't it also being talked about on here before the final whistle? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Botlad67 Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 It’s just really lazy from the club , got my answer in 2 minutes off Google that the player had played for Clydebank v pollok. All the info is online now not sure why a simple check wasn’t done 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craigkillie Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 24 minutes ago, Firepit said: Whether it has an effect or not it would be proper governance to know exactly the status of all players under your employment . Why? What would Clyde achieve by doing so? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firepit Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 (edited) 11 minutes ago, craigkillie said: Why? What would Clyde achieve by doing so? To keep proper records . Of all the things to challenge on I am surprised you are debating good practice Edited March 13, 2023 by Firepit 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimbaxters Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 4 minutes ago, Firepit said: To keep proper records . Of all the things to challenge on I am surprised you are debating good practice The more reliable of the two sources should have been the Cup organisers. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazmcl Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 59 minutes ago, jimbaxters said: Did you read the statement from Talbot? They didn't ask Clydebank. They seem to have taken the Competition Organisers at their word. Is not not how Buffs got away with their misdemeanour earier in the season? It seems similar but not exactly as ours was a sending off suspension and not a player being cup tied. Our Secretary followed the process outlined to all Club Secretaries about checking suspensions with the Sfa. We were advised, after following the correct process, that Kev wasn't suspended. If they followed the correct process, which I'm not sure of in this case, and someone has misadvised then I'd say it should be overturned. If they haven't followed the process as expected then unfortunately regardless of anything else it's cut and dry. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killiepiyo Posted March 13, 2023 Share Posted March 13, 2023 5 minutes ago, Gazmcl said: It seems similar but not exactly as ours was a sending off suspension and not a player being cup tied. Our Secretary followed the process outlined to all Club Secretaries about checking suspensions with the Sfa. We were advised, after following the correct process, that Kev wasn't suspended. If they followed the correct process, which I'm not sure of in this case, and someone has misadvised then I'd say it should be overturned. If they haven't followed the process as expected then unfortunately regardless of anything else it's cut and dry. Statement says the process has been followed, it came back he could play from the competition Secretary, not sure who else you can officially check with? Seems like they managed to get the other three players right in the exact same process so makes you wonder… 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.