Jump to content

Who will be the next permanent manager of the Conservatives?


Ludo*1

Who will be the next head of the Conservative Party?  

190 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Duries Air Freshener said:

You've lost the plot.

Nah, that's clearly Hunt, given that he appears to think 'because we used to do it' is all the justification required to bring back outlawed practices. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, BFTD said:

TBF, it worked for Labour and the Democrats in the Nineties.

I am rather looking forward to seeing what our version of QAnon turns out like. And by "looking forward", of course, I mean dreading.

It'll be the same except the shadowy paedophilic cabal will be comprised entirely of refugees. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, BFTD said:

Nah, it'll all be fine, lads. Nobody protects vulnerable foreigners like good ol' Blighty.

Wonder when we'll start seeing pieces in the Mail and Express about all the Sky TV and Netflix that IMERGANTS are getting in Rwanda, while pensioners freeze to death and veterans sleep on the streets due to the EU and the lefties who haven't run the country in more than thirty years...erm...

Wait till all the gammon find out that the deportation is reciprocal and that Rwanda will be sending their refugees from the DRC. 

Will Rwanda send people to the UK in return?

Yes. Under the deal, the UK will resettle "a portion of" Rwanda's most vulnerable refugees in Britain in a ‘reciprocal’ agreement.

No10 was unable to say whether that could mean more asylum seekers will end up coming from Rwanda to the UK than the other way round.

image.jpeg.bbe1104458824c3d4b8c7900768e23ff.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Boo Khaki said:

Wonder if the Rwandan Government has tried to spin that by claiming the prospect of being sent to the UK will discourage refugees from DRC?

They'll also be able to say that it's costing them f**k all too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Joey Jo Jo Junior Shabadoo said:

That's him halfway through the chorus of "Blame It On The Boogie". 

Would “Blame It On The Rishi” not be a better slogan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, carpetmonster said:

However, removing trans people from the proposed ban on 'conversion therapy' goes beyond 'having a dig at trans people' and is screamingly transphobic.

Also worth pointing out (and I know that you aren't saying this for a minute) that 'not wanting our children confused by questions of gender' is absolutely transphobic as well.

The idea that children so much as being aware of the existence of transgender people will somehow corrupt and lead them astray is the very definition of a 'dig at trans people'.

Children should absolutely be aware of the idea that non-cis gender identities are completely normal in the same way that they should be aware that not being heterosexual is completely normal.

Hiding the existence of trans people from children doesn't stop them from existing, it just creates trans people who don't understand themselves or feel like they don't have a place in the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jesus suffering f**k. :angry:

"We spend too much on welfare"

Aye, a huge proportion of which is State Pensions. High time the triple lock went, but naw, better just just throw out a raw meat soundbite for the Mail readers, even though it's a matter that you clearly haven't the first fucking clue about. Truly is an utterly revolting waste of skin. "Choosing" to rely on 'taxpayers money'. Every fucking dog whistle going.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Boo Khaki said:

Jesus suffering f**k. :angry:

"We spend too much on welfare"

Aye, a huge proportion of which is State Pensions. High time the triple lock went, but naw, better just just throw out a raw meat soundbite for the Mail readers, even though it's a matter that you clearly haven't the first fucking clue about. Truly is an utterly revolting waste of skin. "Choosing" to rely on 'taxpayers money'. Every fucking dog whistle going.

Tories truly are scummy c***s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, williemillersmoustache said:

Forces sweetheart, Chris Morris plagiariser and nostalgia junkie Penny Mourdant is leading the polls with the membership. 

Mental. 

She might be, but the methodology of that ConHome poll is very different from one done by a polling company. I would be taking that poll with a pinch of salt. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Clown Job said:

Tories truly are scummy c***s

How do you know she doesn’t have a point?

Pensions, child benefits, etc, in my book are not welfare.

Businesses seem to be very short of labour and there are lots of people out of the workforce.

Maybe there are more self- employed?

Who knows. Certainly needs investigating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Dawson Park Boy said:

How do you know she doesn’t have a point?

Pensions, child benefits, etc, in my book are not welfare.

Businesses seem to be very short of labour and there are lots of people out of the workforce.

Maybe there are more self- employed?

Who knows. Certainly needs investigating.

I'd have thought you'd be pitching for Kemi Badenoch, big fan of the toadmeister's "Free Speech Union".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...