Jump to content

The years of discontent, 2022/23


101

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Gaz said:

I've been borrowing my mum's car (vroom vroom!) the past couple of days so been listening to Five Live on my morning commute rather than my usual podcasts.

The presenters are really not even hiding their anti-union stance.

Did she not show you how to work the radio?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Gaz said:

I've been borrowing my mum's car (vroom vroom!) the past couple of days so been listening to Five Live on my morning commute rather than my usual podcasts.

The presenters are really not even hiding their anti-union stance.

Just shows what a bubble you’ve been living in.

At least your mum seems to have some sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, carpetmonster said:

I’d imagine if my union weren’t pushing back against 2 and 7 in particular I’d be strongly questioning the point of my union. 

Which would be (mostly) reasonable. Although it's notable that the RMT do not actually mention these outrageous points in their statement about why they rejected:

https://www.rmt.org.uk/news/no-to-network-rail-offer/

I'd suggest that Taj Ali is being as economical with the truth about the literal terms of an agreement as the government.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Scotty Tunbridge said:

I dunno, a 9% offer really isn’t that bad tbh (it’s not still a pay cut so don’t wheel that line out).

If it was on its own then yes, I would agree. But it's clearly not, therefore the package on the table is not one they are willing to accept.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, SweeperDee said:

pretty much sums it all up. Anyone against the strikes are either zipped up at the back, Tory boot lickers, or just well off enough not to care. Country is run by, and full of despicable c***s; hate them all. 

I think that’s overly simplistic.

Personally I support all of those that have downed tools so far and think that they all have good reasons for going out. 
There are good arguments against some of the action as well.

Not all the strikes have the same context. 

The Scottish teachers’ strike was different from the English one because of the budget constraints on Holyrood. There were reasonable arguments put forward about the distributional impacts of that claim on lower paid staff. Of course, it’s P&B so there was some knee jerk reactionary Ill thought out shit too, but there was at least a point to make. We had a teacher on here saying he’d voted against action (in England) because he’d prefer funds to go to lower paid assistants. That doesn’t fit your categories at all.

There’s also a moral hazard problem. In my Union days (in a small Union) we balloted on and went on strike against the committee’s advice. Their view was that there was no appetite in the membership for prolonged action (true) and any effort would be tokenism. We had such low density in the workplace that no one really noticed we were out for a day and the employer pushed through the changes anyway. 
 

Obviously it’s not exactly the same for the bigger unions with higher membership densities but showing your hand can be a bad idea and let the employer know just how weak your resolve is. 
 

Then there’s the problem of the occasional grandstanding egomaniac who likes calling strikes to get on the telly and be all Scargilly without any care for their members long term best interests and the sustainability of their position. I don’t think there’s as many of these as there used to be, but there’s a couple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2022/dec/15/tssa-network-rail-accept-improved-pay-deal-train-strikes

Quote

 

The offer, a two-year deal covering the missed January 2022 pay rise and 2023, was rejected last week by the RMT, which is pressing ahead with a second 48-hour strike on Thursday.

The TSSA said the vote was on a 70% turnout of 2,500 union members in its lower-paid grades at Network Rail, mainly in safety, maintenance and track control roles. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 01/12/2022 at 13:46, ICTChris said:

 

I’ve got the feeling we’ll be hearing from her again, a new Scottish media character is born, ala Jane Park.

Yep.

https://www.glasgowlive.co.uk/news/glasgow-news/glasgow-only-fans-teacher-banned-25794445?fbclid=IwAR2OU_Gfm5Ibx_Mza7CU8XRhPOW6XZ1srll21JXzYwyUA-JwtFnhRwC_9Uk

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

 

NHS England medical director Prof Stephen Powis has advised the public: "Don't get so drunk that you end up with an unnecessary visit to A&E".

Speaking on BBC Radio 4's Today programme, he asked the public to be sensible during the season of parties before Christmas, and said that "today is not the best of days to end up in an A&E department if you don't need to be there".

 

I mean, you probably shouldn't get so drunk you have to go to A&E ever rather than just when there's a strike on.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 14/12/2022 at 18:04, coprolite said:

I think that’s overly simplistic.

Personally I support all of those that have downed tools so far and think that they all have good reasons for going out. 
There are good arguments against some of the action as well.

Not all the strikes have the same context. 

The Scottish teachers’ strike was different from the English one because of the budget constraints on Holyrood. There were reasonable arguments put forward about the distributional impacts of that claim on lower paid staff. Of course, it’s P&B so there was some knee jerk reactionary Ill thought out shit too, but there was at least a point to make. We had a teacher on here saying he’d voted against action (in England) because he’d prefer funds to go to lower paid assistants. That doesn’t fit your categories at all.

There’s also a moral hazard problem. In my Union days (in a small Union) we balloted on and went on strike against the committee’s advice. Their view was that there was no appetite in the membership for prolonged action (true) and any effort would be tokenism. We had such low density in the workplace that no one really noticed we were out for a day and the employer pushed through the changes anyway. 
 

Obviously it’s not exactly the same for the bigger unions with higher membership densities but showing your hand can be a bad idea and let the employer know just how weak your resolve is. 
 

Then there’s the problem of the occasional grandstanding egomaniac who likes calling strikes to get on the telly and be all Scargilly without any care for their members long term best interests and the sustainability of their position. I don’t think there’s as many of these as there used to be, but there’s a couple.

I seem to recall that just about everything Scargill said about the then government, their intentions for his industry, and his predictions for the future ..., were  accurate, and came true. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, beefybake said:

I seem to recall that just about everything Scargill said about the then government, their intentions for his industry, and his predictions for the future ..., were  accurate, and came true. 

And pulling everyone out on strike hastened the process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...