Jump to content

Russian invasion of Ukraine


Sonam

Recommended Posts

My grandad was Polish. Escaped Poland as the Nazis invaded by walking to Scotland. Enlisted with the British Army and went back. And if all the medals are testament to anything it seems he had one hell of a time. I’d say the Poles are itching for a fight with somebody. Anybody.

For the current equivalence - have you ever seen a lazy Polish painter or joiner? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ukraine will be pushing the "it was intentional" angle very hard.

At best Russia has used up all their lifelines. Even if there is no significant response to the strike, they won't get away with something like this a second time. Irrespective of what caused it to land in Poland.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, alta-pete said:

My grandad was Polish. Escaped Poland as the Nazis invaded by walking to Scotland. Enlisted with the British Army and went back. And if all the medals are testament to anything it seems he had one hell of a time. I’d say the Poles are itching for a fight with somebody. Anybody.

For the current equivalence - have you ever seen a lazy Polish painter or joiner? 

How did he?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont think NATO will take this as an article 5 deal, and I don't think it will trigger a no fly zone. The Russians will be back pedalling as fast as possible.

If it triggers any response I reckon it will be the NATO countries sending the longer range ATACMS to Ukraine. Maybe even begin integration efforts for some of the long range air to surface cruise missiles like Storm Shadow.

The rationale for not wanting NATO weaponry blasting bits of Russia looks pretty thin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, jagfox said:

Article 4 most likely outcome and potential for no fly zone/ NATO air defence over Western Ukraine. 

Also, there may be some actual NATO hardware sent to Ukraine. 

 

No chance. A no fly zone would need a willingness to shoot down Russian jets.  Never going to happen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Savage Henry said:

No chance. A no fly zone would need a willingness to shoot down Russian jets.  Never going to happen. 

Not many Russian jets over Ukraine apart from the front lines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, DiegoDiego said:

Wojtek disagrees. 49bddbea003dfdbc0f3eeee2c04cbffa.jpg

I liked the story of a visiting American officer who saw Wojtek lugging boxes of shells around and asked the Poles what the f**k was going on...the Pole that was with him hit back quick as a flash:

"In America, you've got the right to bear arms...in Poland, we've got the right to arm bears."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just read about Wojtek on Wiki.

Some boy! Finished up in Edinburgh Zoo.
There's a great statue of him in Princess Street Gardens. Had a bit of a picnic next to it a couple of years ago and saw a few families, both Polish and Scots, explaining the story to their children.

I know there was hoo-ha about Edinburgh having more statues of animals than women, but I think the Wojtek one does an excellent job of harmonising the Scots and Poles.

Bamse, the Norwegian dog buried with full military honours of whom a bronze stands proudly in Montrose, is another great tale. He used to get the bus to Dundee, head to the boozer and round the troops up when they were due back at base.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, dorlomin said:

Sorry for the more casual browsers, but I think that for something to be a causus belli, a reason to go to war, there has to be mens rea

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mens_rea

That is it has to be intentional.

This isn't war related but, fyi, mens rea is not the same as the act being intentional.

Mens rea is  a Latin term used to refer to the "mental element" of a crime, most crimes being comprised of (i) a physical element (the act, in Latin the actus reus) and (ii) a mental element (the mind state, in Latin the mens rea).

The mens rea can consist of either negligence, recklessness, or intention. For example, the actus reus of both murder and involuntary manslaughter is causing someone's death. The mens rea for murder is intent - you must have intended to murder (or cause GBH). In contrast, the mens rea of involuntary manslaughter is recklessness or negligence - i.e. you disregarded, or were unreasonably unaware, of the risk of causing death.

Idk if that made sense as it's late and, in any event, I am a boring b*****d.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...