Jump to content

Russian invasion of Ukraine


Sonam

Recommended Posts

44 minutes ago, virginton said:

Not to worry, it's just about ready to be recast by the Western media from 'heinous act of international terrorism' to 'glorious act of self-defence'. 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/mar/07/officials-believe-pro-ukraine-group-sabotage-nord-stream-pipelines

A reminder that anyone who called bullshit on this lie at the time was of course merely a running dog of Russian imperialism. 🤡

Oh dear, so when the point was made the likely source was Russians, you didn’t believe anyone in the West or the media….

Now reports from the West and the media are ones you approve of, you believe them….

Does it hurt? No, really, does it hurt to be this stupid?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reports today that a group of Ukrainian commandos operating independently did this, with the aid of a private sponsor who paid for it all - the hire of a yacht, the significant volume of explosives, the experienced divers etc.

The Times reported that a wealthy figure sponsored the operation and "left a peculiar calling card".  Lawyers watching so we'd better not start roshen into judgement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, ICTChris said:

Reports today that a group of Ukrainian commandos operating independently did this, with the aid of a private sponsor who paid for it all - the hire of a yacht, the significant volume of explosives, the experienced divers etc.

The Times reported that a wealthy figure sponsored the operation and "left a peculiar calling card".  Lawyers watching so we'd better not start roshen into judgement.

image.jpeg.5a2957498853f190c355ff1b88529e11.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, ICTChris said:

The Times reported that a wealthy figure sponsored the operation and "left a peculiar calling card".  Lawyers watching so we'd better not start roshen into judgement.

Ian McCall is a Ukrainian enabler? Mind. Blown. 

Edited by alta-pete
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Russia has launched missile attacks overnight, including six Kinzahl hypersonic missiles.  They've said this was done in retaliation for the incursion to Brydansk.  Most of the missiles seem to have targeted the Ukrainian power supply - the first strikes on power in the last three weeks or so.  Most of the areas have had power restored - around nine people are reported to have died.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ICTChris said:

Russia has launched missile attacks overnight, including six Kinzahl hypersonic missiles.  They've said this was done in retaliation for the incursion to Brydansk.  Most of the missiles seem to have targeted the Ukrainian power supply - the first strikes on power in the last three weeks or so.  Most of the areas have had power restored - around nine people are reported to have died.

It’s interesting that Russia is choosing to use the Kinzahl’s in this role. While only having a 500kg warhead, the kinetic energy of the impact of the missile and warhead is closer to equivalent to 4,000kg…but…

-It’s a strategic capable weapon, able to carry a nuclear warhead, yet it’s being thrown away on these attacks.

-It’s not showing itself to be particularly precision in its strikes, which suggests either the Russians are using this conflict to beta test the weapon or they are really low on other precision weapons systems.

-Using the Kinzahl in this way, a few strikes on Ukraine, is allowing NATO to get good data on the Kinzahl, its performance and its systems. It’s also entirely possible that some elements of a Kinzahl will fall into Western hands, although the high speed of impact (Mach 12) would suggest very little should survive.

-Russian quality control is poor enough that if you fire a number of Kinzahl, at least one is likely to malfunction, and it is possible that a malfunctioning missile might land nearly intact, or at least in a salvageable form.

-It's likely that the use of the Kinzahl is against military recommendation and just Putin trying to show who’s bigger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lots of people talked about the Kinzahls as a wonder weapon in the early days or run up to the war but it doesn’t seem to have had any sort of significant impact on the battlefield. Even now, it’s seemingly been used in a retributive attack on civilian infrastructure rather than any sort of context that would be useful to Russian forces on the field. 

Also, a U.S. official has denied the story that US intelligence has assessed that NordStream was blown up by a pro-Ukrainian commando group. Bit of Mandy Rice-Davies about that one but worth noting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, ICTChris said:

Lots of people talked about the Kinzahls as a wonder weapon in the early days or run up to the war but it doesn’t seem to have had any sort of significant impact on the battlefield. Even now, it’s seemingly been used in a retributive attack on civilian infrastructure rather than any sort of context that would be useful to Russian forces on the field. 

Also, a U.S. official has denied the story that US intelligence has assessed that NordStream was blown up by a pro-Ukrainian commando group. Bit of Mandy Rice-Davies about that one but worth noting.

The Kinzahl is really just a Iskander in drag. It’s only hypersonic because of the ballistic trajectory it follows and was created by grafting an improved guidance section onto the old Iskander 9K720 IRBM. Overall, the Russians seem to have used between 15 and 20 Kinzahl’s from an estimated pre-war inventory in the mid-double digit range. This would mean somewhere between 20 and 40% of the available weapons have now been used to little effect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting note that the Russians had paused their attack on Ukrainian power infrastructure for the past three weeks, and when they resumed the attacks could only muster 81 missiles, the majority being the difficult to intercept Kinzahl and anti-ship cruise missile weapons. Since both these weapons are difficult to produce, their stocks aren’t exactly brimming full and will be hard to replace quickly. There have also been recent reports from Wagner that ammunition arriving at the front is date coded 2023, and just in time production is a very dicey proposition for ammunition.

The best numbers are that Russians had 40-50 Kinzahl, and have expended 20 or so…300 Kh-555 cruise missiles, over 150 expended…940 Iskander IRBM’s, with 780+ expended…8,000 S-300’s, with 7,000+ expended…620 Kalibr cruise missiles, with 250 expended, etc. Production numbers are a fraction of expenditure, and this pause that just occurred may confirm the reports that Russia is estimated to have reserves for less than 5 volley attacks of a similar nature left. Also, the largest percentage number of weapons left are nuclear platforms, of which a certain number must be reserved for strategic concerns.

In Bakhmut, the front line is now the river, which explains why the Russians are pushing an envelopment strategy, as a river crossing under attack is suicidal in this environment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Problems with the Ukrainian activist theory for NordStream. The yacht that was “used” does not have sufficient capacity to carry 2 tonnes of explosive, a decompression chamber, and all the specialist heli-ox diving equipment necessary to do the job alone. The German investigators are now pursuing a state actor possibility due to the significant investment and training necessary to do the job over 4 days at 80+ metres. If a state actor is involved, false flags or distractions are nearly assured.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, TxRover said:

Problems with the Ukrainian activist theory for NordStream. The yacht that was “used” does not have sufficient capacity to carry 2 tonnes of explosive, a decompression chamber, and all the specialist heli-ox diving equipment necessary to do the job alone. The German investigators are now pursuing a state actor possibility due to the significant investment and training necessary to do the job over 4 days at 80+ metres. If a state actor is involved, false flags or distractions are nearly assured.

It was the US

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LongTimeLurker said:

 

Now that’s a problem for Russia. The T-62 is much less than an older T-72, it’s a completely different platform, meaning new logistical issues like inexperienced maintenance crews and a shortage of spares. The T-62 has thinner armour, very little night fighting capacity, poor radios, no networking capacity, a smaller main gun, lower rate of fire, lower speed and shorter range. More unnervingly for the Russian tank crews, the T-62 stores 14 ready rounds in the fighting compartment, meaning that a hit kills the crew, and is also known for weak armour in the vicinity of the fuel tank. We can expect Russian crews bailing out of T-62’s in difficult situations to avoid likely death. The  T-62M/MV was upgraded with early reactive armour, its last seeious upgrade was in the mid-80’s, that only protected part of the front of the tank. Even better, the T-62’s armour improvements over the T-55/56 came at the expense of thinner top and lower side armour, making the T-62 very vulnerable to both mines and top attack munitions, although some had an armoured belly plate retrofitted. Given these weaknesses, combined operations with troops providing cover to reduce enemy infantry threats is a requirement, and here the T-62 has another problem…it’s slower than the IFV’s that it needs to work with for its protection.

The most fun note is that the Russians have thousands of T-72/T-80’s in storage that cannot be reactivated. There are an estimated 3,000+ T-72’s stored that are scrap due to embezzlement, fraud, misappropriation, corruption and incompetence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...