Jump to content

Russian invasion of Ukraine


Sonam

Recommended Posts

That account is part of a genuine, albeit tiny and mostly online, political movement based in USA. In the very, very slim chance that anyone here wants to learn more about them, I gave this 2 hour plus video-podcast a listen recently and it's a very thorough exposition.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, FreedomFarter said:

That account is part of a genuine, albeit tiny and mostly online, political movement based in USA. In the very, very slim chance that anyone here wants to learn more about them, I gave this 2 hour plus video-podcast a listen recently and it's a very thorough exposition.

 

Couldn't you just tell us what happens?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Sergeant Wilson said:

Couldn't you just tell us what happens?

Aye, I don't see that link getting many clicks!

The video explores a strand to the anglophone far left based in USA but with links to Russia. The Grayzone website's behaviour is highlighted. Especially its campaign against a popular Youtuber, Abigail Thorn, who the Grayzone claim is an MI5 agent. 

A US grassroots organisation - Centre for Political Innovation - is looked at. It's the official face to a mostly online movement, followers of which often call themselves "Patriotic Socialists". You can see how that name chimes somewhat with National Bolshevism. The anti-Paul McCartney Twitter user above seems to be a follower of this Patriotic Socialists movement. Luminaries of it have travelled to Russia and spoken at conferences alongside Dugin. 

Edited by FreedomFarter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, FreedomFarter said:

Aye, I don't see that link getting many clicks!

The video explores a strand to the anglophone far left based in USA but with links to Russia. The Grayzone website's behaviour is highlighted. Especially its campaign against a popular Youtuber, Abigail Thorn, who the Grayzone claim is an MI5 agent. 

A US grassroots organisation - Centre for Political Innovation - is looked at. It's the official face to a mostly online movement, followers of which often call themselves "Patriotic Socialists". You can see how that name chimes somewhat with National Bolshevism. The anti-Paul McCartney Twitter user above seems to be a follower of this Patriotic Socialists movement. Luminaries of it have travelled to Russia and spoken at conferences alongside Dugin. 

I wish I hadn't asked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Ukrainians now appear to be hitting ammunition depots deep behind enemy lines to an extent they weren't before:

Think it's safe to assume it is HIMARS if they could accurately do two important targets in one salvo.

Edited by LongTimeLurker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reminds me of the old Soviet joke -

 

A man visits a newspaper vendor's stall in Moscow every morning and buys the daily newspaper. He pays for it, looks at the front page headlines and throws it away. This goes on every day - he buys the paper, glances at it and throws it away. One day the vendor asks him,

 

"Why do you buy a newspaper every day, look at the front page then throw it away?"

 

"I'm looking for an obituary" replies the man.

 

"But they don't publish obituaries on the front page" said the vendor.

 

"Oh the one I'm looking for they will"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...after four months of war. As with HIMARS it kind of begs the question of what took them so long to get around to doing that. Only sensible looking answer I've seen to that is that the Ukrainians first had to prove they had the will to fight and were capable of winning with only their own forces if properly supplied and weren't going to wind up being like the corrupt Afghan government NATO propped up for about 20 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems to have been a double missile strike on a shopping mall in Kremenchuk, in Central Ukraine.  Two confirmed dead but the numbers expected to rise.

Some terrible videos coming out of the aftermath.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Thick of It scenes from the G7 continue to come thick and fast.

Quote

 

Boris Johnson has claimed that Vladimir Putin would not have invaded Ukraine if he was a woman and believes that the war is a “perfect example of toxic masculinity”.

In an interview with German media following the G7 summit in Schloss Elmau, the prime minister cited the Russian president’s gender as a contributory factor to the conflict.

Johnson told broadcaster ZDF: “If Putin was a woman, which he obviously isn’t, if he were, I really don’t think he would have embarked on a crazy, macho war of invasion and violence in the way that he has.

“If you want a perfect example of toxic masculinity, it’s what he is doing in Ukraine.”

 

DisfiguredOldBass-size_restricted.gif.c1f78971507f37ace3720f8eabc6f9f6.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Editor's note: Badly drawn scarecrow 'Boris Johnson' has to date an uncountable brood of children, often illegitimate, from his string of failed marriages and overlapping affairs. Masculinity hazard level yet to be determined!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...