Jump to content

Russian invasion of Ukraine


Sonam

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Theroadlesstravelled said:


One left Britain to join ISIS and and fight against British soldiers.

The other left Britain to join the Ukrainian army to fight against Russian soldiers.

 

So , both left to fight what people perceive as illegal invasions , what's the difference?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sergeant Wilson said:

Dave, where have come from?

Ukraine mate, in you come.

Muhammad where have you come from?

Ukraine, sorry back to Syria.

We really are a bunch of two faced c*nts , which was the point I'm trying to make. 

To some British people , the Iraq war was illegal and felt it was anti-muslim , so they went to fight against that. The guys in the article say they couldn't sit back and watch parts of Europe being illegally invaded , both are doing an illegal act , but , the ex-servicemen who head to Ukraine will receive a different response for the same act. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, saint dave said:

Poor equivalence. The government of the time forbade British citizens from fighting in Spain. 

Will there be the same treatment as was handed to the Isis fighters who left from Britain and were refused help and made stateless for fighting for a foreign army/state? Think that's a fair question. 

 

Were the ISIS fighters refused help as they had fought for or aided a proscribed terrorist organisation?

The people going over to Ukraine are either enlisting in the Ukrainian army or acting as mercenaries which is not illegal?

The rights and wrongs can be argued individually but don’t see them being interchangeable.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Newbornbairn said:

There's whataboutery and there's whataboutery but this is just not very good Student Union whataboutery.

 

You might have a point if Brits were going to fight for Russia, but they're not so you don't. 

You're mixing up whataboutery with fact.

Both groups left Britain to take part in a war in other countries , should we just use the law and punishments against those groups we don't like?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tight John McVeigh is a tit said:

Were the ISIS fighters refused help as they had fought for or aided a proscribed terrorist organisation?

The people going over to Ukraine are either enlisting in the Ukrainian army or acting as mercenaries which is not illegal?

The rights and wrongs can be argued individually but don’t see them being interchangeable.

 

It's against British law for a British citizen to fight in a war against a country we are " at peace " with , we aren't at war with Russia ( yet ) which makes it illegal.*

 

Think it's The Enlistment act of 1870/80 , hasn't been repealed. 

Edited by saint dave
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, saint dave said:

It's against British law for a British citizen to fight in a war against a country we are " at peace " with , we aren't at war with Russia ( yet ) which makes it illegal.*

 

Think it's The Enlistment act of 1870/80 , hasn't been repealed. 

Two completely different legal precedents then so not the same.

There is also enough legal precedence to say that the enlistment act is irrelevant today and has been for decades. 
 

Whether anyone should be prosecuted for going to Ukraine can be open for debate, but it’s a weak (non existent) argument in relation to people who fought for ISIS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aren't they technically not fighting "a country" as they are against the unrecognised states of Donetsk and Luhansk? Seem to remember reading a few weeks ago that was the official line Putin was coming out with as it allowed Russia to recruit foreign fighters (eg from the "Stan" countries).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 26/03/2022 at 02:08, Theroadlesstravelled said:


Nah that's you mate.

The Houthis are terrorists. Ukrainian civilians are not.

 

Off topic I know, but fucking what?!

You could easily have responded to that post without justifying Saudi Arabia's actions in Yemen, rather than indulging in whataboutery yourself. Arguing that causing the worst humanitarian crisis on the planet with several famines, a cholera epidemic, a blockade to stop aid getting in and of course reducing the entire country to rubble with indiscriminate attacks on civilians is somehow justified because "Houthis are terrorists" is somewhere in the region of "the Azov Battalion exists so Ukraine must be denazified".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, saint dave said:

It's against British law for a British citizen to fight in a war against a country we are " at peace " with , we aren't at war with Russia ( yet ) which makes it illegal.*

 

Think it's The Enlistment act of 1870/80 , hasn't been repealed. 

The foreign secretary, who is probably the 3rd most senior politician in the country said it was fine to go off to Ukraine to fight, so I don't see how they could turn round and say actually it was illegal and you shouldn't have gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...