Jump to content

Russian invasion of Ukraine


Sonam

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, virginton said:

war tactics at this stage in the conflict as beyond the pale of any significant power is just nonsense. 

Interesting take to file war crimes as war tactics.

Yes they are similar to the scenes in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria and Palestine but just because we are used to seeing civilians blown to f**k doesn't make it right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, 101 said:

Interesting take to file war crimes as war tactics.

Yes they are similar to the scenes in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria and Palestine but just because we are used to seeing civilians blown to f**k doesn't make it right.

War crimes requires significant evidence of conscious intent. Fighting a war against an armed opponent in a city is going to lead to significant civilian casualties - or 'collateral damage' as the Yanks prefer to call it - regardless of the army fighting there. 

That we have built up a completely unrealistic picture of how war should work since 1945 - and have completely ignored all evidence to the contrary from Vietnam through Ethiopia and Armenia in the past 18 months alone - is really not relevant. You cannot launch an international war crimes charge only on countries that the West doesn't like. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ICTChris said:

Russian warship in Berdyansk appears to have been taken out.  Reports that it was a Ukrainian ballistic missile.

 

 

Ooft - it's the Orsk, a decent-sized landing ship. There could have been anything up to 20 tanks or 40 AFVs on it when that happened depending on what stage it was at discharging its cargo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Hillonearth said:

Ooft - it's the Orsk, a decent-sized landing ship. There could have been anything up to 20 tanks or 40 AFVs on it when that happened depending on what stage it was at discharging its cargo.

 
Probably already offloaded.
 

 

Edited by welshbairn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Hillonearth said:

Aye, the Russians don't come across as all that efficient but you wouldn't imagine it would take even them three days to empty a ship :)

Aye, empty it first, then park up for a few days r&r. What could go wrong with that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, virginton said:

War crimes requires significant evidence of conscious intent*. Fighting a war against an armed opponent in a city is going to lead to significant civilian casualties** - or 'collateral damage' as the Yanks prefer to call it - regardless of the army fighting there. 

That we have built up a completely unrealistic picture of how war should work since 1945*** - and have completely ignored all evidence to the contrary from Vietnam through Ethiopia and Armenia in the past 18 months alone - is really not relevant. You cannot launch an international war crimes charge only on countries that the West doesn't like.***

* Plenty of evidence including footage and information as to what kind of weapons are being used against what kind of targets.

** It's a fucking invasion of a sovereign country, not some equal footing conflict on neutral ground. Civilian casualties, by the very nature of an invasion, will tend to be from the local population - you know, the awkward bastárds defending their homes, families and livelihoods. 

*** "We"? I'd be interested to know who you think you're speaking on behalf of here, because it certainly isn't me or anyone I know. War, by its very nature, cannot be pursued according to a set of rules. Aggressors will use whatever tactics, weapons and methods will achieve their aims. Defenders will resort to desperation when in extremis. It is never pretty, and cannot be parcelled up neatly in discussions divorced from the reality.

**** It would, however, be a start. Once you get Putin and the like convicted, we can maybe, just maybe, start asking those bastions of decency like Blair, Bush, Brown, Trump and Obama how their implementation of Foreign Policy were acceptable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Russia Today helpfully pinpointed where to aim the Ukrainian missiles.

https://t.me/msgazdiev/784

Quote

We filmed unique footage - the Russian large landing ship "Orsk", accompanied by the naval forces of the Black Sea Fleet, entered and unloaded military equipment in the port of Berdyansk.

Ukrainian troops that were based in Berdyansk - thousands and thousands of soldiers and sailors - surrendered the port without a fight, leaving the entire infrastructure of the port intact.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like more than one Russian ship is on fire.

 

The Ukrainian Navyis pretty much non-existent post 2014, when all the ships were captured and large chunk of the forces defected during the Crimea annexation.  I don't think they have any real prospect of threatening the Russian ships off Odessa from the sea so an attack like this is quite unexpected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sergeant Wilson said:

Parachuting out a boat is a bit odd. No wonder they're  getting beat.

It also explains the heavy losses to Russian paratroopers early in the conflict if they were jumping out of planes in scuba gear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...