Jump to content

5 subs introduced for the 2nd half of the season as scab diddy club joins the Old Firm


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Jim McLean's Ghost said:

Well 5 subs are back. The proposal to continue 5 subs was binned at the start of the season but it seems one diddy club have had a change of heart.  So now the rules are being changed midway through the season

 

So who was it? own up.

Assuming it will be one of Aberdeen, Hearts or Hibs. 

Probably the Dons

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, sergie's no1 fan said:

Assuming it will be one of Aberdeen, Hearts or Hibs. 

Probably the Dons

Aberdeen no doubt one of the four but also probably the original OF arse licker in the 9-3 vote.

Chief suspect is obviously Dundee. Well known suspect voters. dodgy owners but they barely have a team as it is...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, craigkillie said:

9 clubs voted for it surely.

Aye but there were 4 against it, now only 3.

We need to know who it was.

Motherwell obviously always against it.

It would be SHOCKING if hearts voted for it at this stage. Didn't they have a whole thing about how it was awful to change rules mid season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I'm all for it, as it will give my own club an advantage over clubs with less strength in depth. You would have to assume that the clubs against it will be the ones with the least strength in depth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jim McLean's Ghost said:

Aye but there were 4 against it, now only 3.

We need to know who it was.

Motherwell obviously always against it.

It would be SHOCKING if hearts voted for it at this stage. Didn't they have a whole thing about how it was awful to change rules mid season.

How can we have changed our vote, when we never got a vote though? Or was it voted for before the start of the season, when it was known we were promoted?

Anyway, after it became obvious that self-interest was the king a couple of seasons ago, I'd expect us to just do what is best for ourselves and not really bother giving a f**k how it affects anyone else. Why would we?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Kyle Reese said:

Personally I'm all for it, as it will give my own club an advantage over clubs with less strength in depth. You would have to assume that the clubs against it will be the ones with the least strength in depth. 

Since Motherwell, with our huge and amazing squad voted against it.

It means 2 of St Mirren, Livingston, Dundee and St Johnstone voted for it despite not having 10 decent players, never mind 16.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, invergowrie arab said:

Hopefully Dundee United were in favour of this and again flexing our muscles against the wee teams like when we take their best players at will. 

This probably explains why Motherwell are now scrambling around trying to take shite like Jordan Roberts off our hands. 😄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Kyle Reese said:

How can we have changed our vote, when we never got a vote though? Or was it voted for before the start of the season, when it was known we were promoted?

Anyway, after it became obvious that self-interest was the king a couple of seasons ago, I'd expect us to just do what is best for ourselves and not really bother giving a f**k how it affects anyone else. Why would we?

I would beleive Hearts voted as a Premiership team at the start of the season.

The absolute SCANDAL would be if Hearts had voted to change the rules mid-season because I think they have been quite vocal about that sort of thing in the past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jim McLean's Ghost said:

Since Motherwell, with our huge and amazing squad voted against it.

It means 2 of St Mirren, Livingston, Dundee and St Johnstone voted for it despite not having 10 decent players, never mind 16.

Not my place to speculate, but I've always found Dundee supporters to have shifty wee eyes. Who knows though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jim McLean's Ghost said:

I would beleive Hearts voted as a Premiership team at the start of the season.

The absolute SCANDAL would be if Hearts had voted to change the rules mid-season because I think they have been quite vocal about that sort of thing in the past.

Nah, we were consistently told by all and sundry that you have to look out for yourselves in these situations. Once bitten and all that. :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jim McLean's Ghost said:

Since Motherwell, with our huge and amazing squad voted against it.

It means 2 of St Mirren, Livingston, Dundee and St Johnstone voted for it despite not having 10 decent players, never mind 16.

We definitely would've voted for it in the first place, our squad is massive. 26 with 7 out on loan - 5 subs would let us make us of that full 26 probably, even if it includes Sean Kelly :mellow:

Edited by ATLIS
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...