Jump to content

The Famous Aberdeen v the Glesga Sevco


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, gannonball said:

It’s an incident being discussed on a match thread for a game on sky. This copy and paste retort from twitter doesn’t really add up tbh.

I would NEVER watch your mob .. NEVER! You unwashed are a strange bunch indeed. 
 

Brown eventually booked about 30 minutes after he should have been 

Tav booked for excellent challenge 

Same old Kevin Clancy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheScarf said:

You see it every time rangers are on sky. As if no one other than rangers fans and the fans of the team they’re playing are allowed to watch and comment on it.

Someone should tell Sky thats the rules.  Will cost them a few quid in subscriptions but rules is rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, craigkillie said:


Something that isn't just a coming together of legs of two guys nowhere near the ball.

Its not though is it? Its an attempt to play the ball that completely missed the ball becasue Hedges got there first, and played the man instead. Arguing that he has to hit the man harder before its a foul is verging on yer da's thoughts on the matter tbh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheScarf said:

You see it every time rangers are on sky. As if no one other than rangers fans and the fans of the team they’re playing are allowed to watch and comment on it.

I think some just support Rangers and have a general disinterest/disdain for Scottish football for various reasons.
 

1 minute ago, AB1872 said:

I would NEVER watch your mob .. NEVER! You unwashed are a strange bunch indeed. 
 

Brown eventually booked about 30 minutes after he should have been 

Tav booked for excellent challenge 

Same old Kevin Clancy

 

I generally try and watch Scottish football whenever it’s on the tele even if it’s on in the background. But then again I’m not a bitter orc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
What does the phrase "what was Hedges meant to do" mean here? He's not meant to do anything, but simply brushing against someone whilst chasing after a ball doesn't constitute a foul. You don't get fouls for simply getting on the end of a long ball.
If you mean "what's he meant to do in order to win a foul", then he needs to angle his run towards McGregor a bit more and take a bigger hit. It would be cheating, but would most likely earn him a foul.

Both scenarios are fouls.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought we were quite good for the opening 20 minutes, especially in our ball retention, but have lost our way a bit after going behind despite never really looking in danger of conceding again. Not much in the game, though - and we would probably be ahead and in a great position if the referee had done his job properly. 

We need to get bodies closer to Ramirez in the second half. He has been a bit isolated at times and it is clear that we are missing Watkins in that regard. Still think there's at least one goal in this for us, but not sure I fully trust our defence yet not to concede at least once more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...