Blowin In the Wind Posted August 9, 2022 Share Posted August 9, 2022 45 minutes ago, newcastle broon said: Onwards and aw that........ Tough one Saturday on the road to Kirkcaldy who've had a decent start. Yes they were pretty decent at Broxburn tonight 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andydoc Posted August 10, 2022 Share Posted August 10, 2022 15 hours ago, 354Pge said: This one falls well in the unacceptable category & coming straight after it happened and Penicuik handling it so well . Can you give me a list of acceptable and unacceptable crimes and advise me how this list is compiled. I do not support WW and have no idea what crime the player has committed (I assume he's been found guilty?), Just curious about the moral judgement process and wonder at the morality of those making the judgement . 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dev Posted August 11, 2022 Share Posted August 11, 2022 At the end of the day the Law is the Law and the person in question has, presumably, served whatever punishment has been deemed to be appropriate in the circumstances. If anyone honestly considers that the Law needs changing then there is a lawful, and potentially effective, way forward. That is to go to your MP and or MSP and let them know in writing what it is that is believed to be wrong and what should be done to amend the law as it currently stands. If anyone, (including local Councillors, MSPs or MPs) decide to go on a campaign of, in effect, harassment of any organisation or individual, then they need to be aware that the laws of the land apply to them also. Personal opinions are one thing but care needs to be taken that it doesn't step into the realms of aggression, bullying, harassment, victimisation, etc. Should those who have been convicted of nasty, or worse, offences be constrained from living a normal, and potentially rehabilitated, life after serving time for their offence(s)? If so how would you suggest that their lives should be constrained? If they are to be constrained then how should that be carried out, monitored and enforced? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARFC Exile Posted August 11, 2022 Share Posted August 11, 2022 I'm 100% cerian that Penicuick will have, at some point, signed and regularly played a player with a criminal conviction. Have you asked your clubs committe if they have vetted each player to meet your moral approval? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cowdenbeath Posted August 11, 2022 Share Posted August 11, 2022 9 minutes ago, 354Pge said: Just to add this is not my petition just passing on behalf of the Rosewell Residents. I believe that a number of things are planned Of interest did any of those people go to games before this all kicked off? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andydoc Posted August 11, 2022 Share Posted August 11, 2022 33 minutes ago, 354Pge said: Just to add this is not my petition just passing on behalf of the Rosewell Residents. I believe that a number of things are planned This woke society is frightening. People actively looking for things to be offended by. Wonder how many players currently in the EOS have criminal convictions. I would bet more than a few. Should the EOS now be banning any player who has a criminal conviction, to avoid somebody getting upset. Is domestic abuse worse than dealing drugs, driving under the influence, assault of a member of the health services / police / or anyone else who works for the community. If we don't allow offenders the opportunity to rejoin society after they've served their sentence, then they will just return to re-offending. I don't the player who has caused this furore, but I've got to believe he has been dealt with by the law and been considered capable of rejoining society. Wouldn't normally quote from the bible, but "he is without sin, cast the first stone". Always amazes me when people say they have never commited a crime - so they've never driven 1 mile over the speed limit, parked where they shouldn't have, taken stationery from work (pens ) or not owned up to being given too much change / been undercharged. We all commit crimes, we just set the bar at different levels from other people. Sorry for the rant, been one of those days 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
19052012 Posted August 11, 2022 Share Posted August 11, 2022 35 minutes ago, cowdenbeath said: Of interest did any of those people go to games before this all kicked off? No, I can 100% guarantee these people do not go to Whitehill games. I am a ST holder at Whitehill and everyone I have spoke to do not have an issue with Paul Tansey. I’m not condoning what he done, but he pled guilty, accepted his punishment (which did not include him stopping playing football). What is the guy supposed to do? Give up his football career, sit in a darkened room until these do-gooders decide it’s ok for him to play again? the bullying and harassment the club are receiving is incredible and not warranted in my opinion. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
19052012 Posted August 11, 2022 Share Posted August 11, 2022 17 minutes ago, 354Pge said: Yes some did including kids through tickets given out to primary schools. Don’t talk rubbish mate, you know absolutely nothing. Not one of the people involved in the petition have ever been to Ferguson Park I can assure you of that -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newcastle broon Posted August 11, 2022 Author Share Posted August 11, 2022 7 hours ago, 354Pge said: Just to add this is not my petition just passing on behalf of the Rosewell Residents. I believe that a number of things are planned Look pal for the size of Rosewell there's certainly a divide there now because some are so far up themselves that despite living in the village they don't like to associate themselves wi the village far less the local football club!! There's hardly any ww fans on here so you're trolling attempts are pretty poor. Not really sure why you are pursuing it on a football forum? As I've said before take it up wi the manager who signed him or the committee. I'm sure they could give you a decent debate but are you just hiding behind a name and trying to play the big man shit stirring? Anyway looking forward after a positive midweek result and a decent game ahead Saturday against an in form Kirkcaldy & Dysart who will certainly fancy their chances. Probs take a point right now. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lithgierose Posted August 11, 2022 Share Posted August 11, 2022 7 hours ago, Andydoc said: This woke society is frightening. People actively looking for things to be offended by. Wonder how many players currently in the EOS have criminal convictions. I would bet more than a few. Should the EOS now be banning any player who has a criminal conviction, to avoid somebody getting upset. Is domestic abuse worse than dealing drugs, driving under the influence, assault of a member of the health services / police / or anyone else who works for the community. If we don't allow offenders the opportunity to rejoin society after they've served their sentence, then they will just return to re-offending. I don't the player who has caused this furore, but I've got to believe he has been dealt with by the law and been considered capable of rejoining society. Wouldn't normally quote from the bible, but "he is without sin, cast the first stone". Always amazes me when people say they have never commited a crime - so they've never driven 1 mile over the speed limit, parked where they shouldn't have, taken stationery from work (pens ) or not owned up to being given too much change / been undercharged. We all commit crimes, we just set the bar at different levels from other people. Sorry for the rant, been one of those days Could sign for livingston 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lithgierose Posted August 11, 2022 Share Posted August 11, 2022 7 hours ago, 19052012 said: No, I can 100% guarantee these people do not go to Whitehill games. I am a ST holder at Whitehill and everyone I have spoke to do not have an issue with Paul Tansey. I’m not condoning what he done, but he pled guilty, accepted his punishment (which did not include him stopping playing football). What is the guy supposed to do? Give up his football career, sit in a darkened room until these do-gooders decide it’s ok for him to play again? the bullying and harassment the club are receiving is incredible and not warranted in my opinion. Good point. Why did Penicuik get rid off him. When he pled guilty and faced the music. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
19052012 Posted August 11, 2022 Share Posted August 11, 2022 1 minute ago, 354Pge said: Approaching 100 people have now signed it and many of them have been. Constant lies and BS from you. And you know it, yet you still come here peddling your nonsense. many of them probably wouldn’t even know where Ferguson park is and that’s a fact! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magoo Posted August 11, 2022 Share Posted August 11, 2022 8 hours ago, cowdenbeath said: Of interest did any of those people go to games before this all kicked off? Did they shit, 99% of the vilage has not supported whitehill in any way,shape or form unless it was a big scottish cup game...welcome to 2022 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Passthebaw Posted August 11, 2022 Share Posted August 11, 2022 (edited) This is ridiculous! Have these pathetic woke people never heard of rehabilitation!? Give the boy & club a break - I wish you well, and we'll miss you this year - Musselburgh fan! Edited August 12, 2022 by Passthebaw 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
upanddoon Posted August 12, 2022 Share Posted August 12, 2022 Why did the Chairman delete his poll? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrIrvinePollock Posted August 12, 2022 Share Posted August 12, 2022 This looks like a one-person mission by @354Pge to destroy Paul Tansey - and all they've actually succeeded in doing is bring loads of people out in support of Paul Tansey! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
19052012 Posted August 12, 2022 Share Posted August 12, 2022 13 minutes ago, upanddoon said: Why did the Chairman delete his poll? Changed the poll now buddy. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
upanddoon Posted August 12, 2022 Share Posted August 12, 2022 2 minutes ago, 19052012 said: Changed the poll now buddy. Thanks Mr Chairman. No wonder you changed it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magoo Posted August 12, 2022 Share Posted August 12, 2022 What time can we expect 354, he was seen at b and q leaving with a new pitchfork about 11 so he can't be far away 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burnieman Posted August 12, 2022 Share Posted August 12, 2022 23 hours ago, Passthebaw said: This is ridiculous! Have these pathetic woke people What's a woke person? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.