Jump to content
baillieinleeds

Raith v Dunfermline. Dunfermline v Raith

Recommended Posts

48 minutes ago, Ebanda's Handyman Services said:

I have a feeling that whoever goes out on Saturday is going to suffer the wrath of some hurting Falkirk supporters. 

Big 'homeless person slagging your curtains' vibes but it's coming. 

 

 

46 minutes ago, Grant228 said:

 

Nah, they're not that stupid. If they'd at least made the playoffs, maybe. 

I'd say it'll be more likely to be the Partick fans given how spectacularly bitter some of their support are at the moment. . 

Edited by Broken Algorithms

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just happy we seem to have broken the mini cycle of the ref awarding the opposition a soft/non existent penalty, refusing us a stonewaller and sending off a Raith man. 

Mind you there's always Saturday. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, Scottydog said:

I'm just happy we seem to have broken the mini cycle of the ref awarding the opposition a soft/non existent penalty, refusing us a stonewaller and sending off a Raith man. 

Mind you there's always Saturday. 

Carefull, facts don't matter with some on here, you'll be accused of being negative humourless and paranoid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Less than three weeks ago we were struggling to get into a game against the bottom team in the league until a referee sent off the opposition's goalkeeper in a scandalous decision.

Nobody's out to get Raith Rovers, ffs. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Davo's red card against hearts has been rescinded so that makes him available to get one on Saturday. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, Raith Against The Machine said:

Tomorrow. 

Nice early start for the disciplinary panel, must've been up since 3am deliberating over that one. Red card overturned. Unclear at the moment whether it's been downgraded to a yellow (like Neil Parry's) or whether it's been rescinded entirely. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, Raith Against The Machine said:

Nice early start for the disciplinary panel, must've been up since 3am deliberating over that one. Red card overturned. Unclear at the moment whether it's been downgraded to a yellow (like Neil Parry's) or whether it's been rescinded entirely. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whatever happened about Davidson’s alleged racist remarks to Todorov? Have the SFA just swept this under the carpet, or was he deemed to be innocent?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Whatever happened about Davidson’s alleged racist remarks to Todorov? Have the SFA just swept this under the carpet, or was he deemed to be innocent?
Todorov's misconduct hearing was meant to be on 29th April, don't think a date had been set for the charges brought against Davidson.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Rob1885 said:
6 minutes ago, CallumPar said:
Whatever happened about Davidson’s alleged racist remarks to Todorov? Have the SFA just swept this under the carpet, or was he deemed to be innocent?

Todorov's misconduct hearing was meant to be on 29th April, don't think a date had been set for the charges brought against Davidson.

Both have been moved to 27th May if i remember correctly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, Rob1885 said:
37 minutes ago, CallumPar said:
Whatever happened about Davidson’s alleged racist remarks to Todorov? Have the SFA just swept this under the carpet, or was he deemed to be innocent?

Todorov's misconduct hearing was meant to be on 29th April, don't think a date had been set for the charges brought against Davidson.

Davidson's hearing was originally at the end of April, Todorov's has always been the end of May. When Davidson's original date came round, the hearing started but was then adjourned to the same date as Todorov's, presumably not by coincidence. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Raith Against The Machine said:

Less than three weeks ago we were struggling to get into a game against the bottom team in the league until a referee sent off the opposition's goalkeeper in a scandalous decision.

Nobody's out to get Raith Rovers, ffs. 

Who said anything about "out to get Raith"? We're pointing out that we've had a string of dubious sending offs, penalties and penalties not giveb, and you come up with one example where  it happened to an opponent which makes it ok.

ffs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Who said anything about "out to get Raith"? We're pointing out that we've had a string of dubious sending offs, penalties and penalties not giveb, and you come up with one example where  it happened to an opponent which makes it ok.
ffs


I’m keen to see this extensive list of dubious decision.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Hank Scorpio said:

 


I’m keen to see this extensive list of dubious decision.

 

Fans of every club think they get shafted by referees on a regular basis. To suggest Raith (or any club) are the only club hard done by is a bit silly. However, when you see who's suggesting it.........it all makes sense. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Raith_Raver said:

Who said anything about "out to get Raith"? We're pointing out that we've had a string of dubious sending offs, penalties and penalties not giveb, and you come up with one example where  it happened to an opponent which makes it ok.

ffs

They weren’t in the highlights, so difficult to tell, but I thought Mendy could have had a straight red in the first half v Hearts when he brought down McKay-Steven who looked right through, and Benedictus got away with a penalty shout when he had his arm up defending a free kick later on in the half. 
 

Aye, the Davidson decision was a stinker, but we’d probably had at least one big decision go for us in that game. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Raith Against The Machine said:

Davidson's hearing was originally at the end of April, Todorov's has always been the end of May. When Davidson's original date came round, the hearing started but was then adjourned to the same date as Todorov's, presumably not by coincidence. 

It was interesting that both hearings were moved until after the play-offs. 

Given the nature of the allegations and that Toderov was also, after a delay, charged too, it seems logical that these should be handled concurrently. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not aware of any string of dubious decisions against us. Think we’ve had a pretty fair season ref wise, usual mix of decisions assisting us and hampering us, but nothing outrageous. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, roverthemoon said:

Not aware of any string of dubious decisions against us. Think we’ve had a pretty fair season ref wise, usual mix of decisions assisting us and hampering us, but nothing outrageous. 

Seriously?

I really need to go find Crawford Allan,  boy took my bribe quite happily but doesn’t seem to have followed through on his end.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thiught the ref in the first leg had a really, really good game. If I was being picky I'd say he missed a booking in the first half for a dive by a Raith player but it's absolutely not the end of the world. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...