Granny Danger Posted April 10, 2021 Share Posted April 10, 2021 Just seen that line up. Go fùck yourself Mellon. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArabianKnight Posted April 10, 2021 Share Posted April 10, 2021 1 minute ago, Granny Danger said: Just seen that line up. Go fùck yourself Mellon. Why? Playing 4231 at least. Would prefer Chalmers instead of McNulty but then also don't want the club having to fork out ridiculous amounts on his wage 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted April 10, 2021 Share Posted April 10, 2021 Just now, ArabianKnight said: Why? Playing 4231 at least. Would prefer Chalmers instead of McNulty but then also don't want the club having to fork out ridiculous amounts on his wage McNulty is not a wide player and Harkes is not a football player. With that squad we have far better options 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
captainkev Posted April 10, 2021 Share Posted April 10, 2021 5 minutes ago, Granny Danger said: Just seen that line up. Go fùck yourself Mellon. It's not that bad a line up, but for McNulty in ahead of Clark, Appéré or Chalmers. 2 minutes ago, ArabianKnight said: Why? Playing 4231 at least. Would prefer Chalmers instead of McNulty but then also don't want the club having to fork out ridiculous amounts on his wage If the club really did take McNulty on a deal with that condition when we already had Shankland, Clark and Appéré then we're absolute mugs. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Connolly Posted April 10, 2021 Share Posted April 10, 2021 2 minutes ago, captainkev said: It's not that bad a line up, but for McNulty in ahead of Clark, Appéré or Chalmers. If the club really did take McNulty on a deal with that condition when we already had Shankland, Clark and Appéré then we're absolute mugs. Do we pay more if he doesn't play? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted April 10, 2021 Share Posted April 10, 2021 Just now, Mark Connolly said: Do we pay more if he doesn't play? I’ve seen that claim on here and find it hard to believe. What sort of idiot would bring in a player on that basis? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArabianKnight Posted April 10, 2021 Share Posted April 10, 2021 That's what I've heard. We need to pay more of a contribution to his wages if we don't play him as often but it's only a rumour. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArabianKnight Posted April 10, 2021 Share Posted April 10, 2021 1 minute ago, Granny Danger said: I’ve seen that claim on here and find it hard to believe. What sort of idiot would bring in a player on that basis? Same idiots that are wanting to give Pawlett an extension and gave Connolly another deal? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bert Raccoon Posted April 10, 2021 Share Posted April 10, 2021 20 minutes ago, Scotty Tunbridge said: It really doesn’t, Rice was close to giving @Bert Raccoon a game today we are missing that many. A no nonsense midfielder is just what we need tbh 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YER SISTERS YER MAW Posted April 10, 2021 Share Posted April 10, 2021 What's the fckn point?[emoji2371] 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helpma Posted April 10, 2021 Share Posted April 10, 2021 oh dear 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Connolly Posted April 10, 2021 Share Posted April 10, 2021 Well I, for one, am glad Mellon hasn't stuck with McNulty! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
captainkev Posted April 10, 2021 Share Posted April 10, 2021 I was halfway through a post moaning about McNulty when he scored. He's just a constant inconvenience. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alert Mongoose Posted April 10, 2021 Share Posted April 10, 2021 Dougie Imrie would have lit up this match. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
accies1874 Posted April 10, 2021 Share Posted April 10, 2021 Pretty decent after a shocking opening - exact same as last week. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cdhafc1874 Posted April 10, 2021 Share Posted April 10, 2021 Dougie Imrie would have lit up this match.If he's kept himself remotely fit Accies should register him as a player til end of the season.Seriously.We have that many players out. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted April 10, 2021 Share Posted April 10, 2021 We appear to have learnt how to defend from corners. Earlier in the season at least one of them would have ended with us conceding. Happy with the score so far but Hamilton have had their chances, at least their style of play is making it an enjoyable watch unlike some of the recent turgid stuff. One big issue, 42 minutes in and zero service to Shanks. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
accies1874 Posted April 10, 2021 Share Posted April 10, 2021 Another game that I'd be enjoying if we weren't desperate for points. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
accies1874 Posted April 10, 2021 Share Posted April 10, 2021 Curtis is back - we'll win now. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helpma Posted April 10, 2021 Share Posted April 10, 2021 Another penalty claim denied - Rice will be raging 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.