Truthteller Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 Just now, Burnieman said: Just a shitebag then. I love you too 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swifty Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 14 minutes ago, bluebell1 said: Deary me, your missing the point No point missed here mate 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burnieman Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 25 minutes ago, Pyramidic said: It is very helpful to see an example of how the re-structuring can work. There is a hint there that Letham may have some hurdles to cross. I do hope they are accepted and if not they will surely apply to the ML and we will have another club south of the Tay boundary. Also things do not look too promising for Sauchie Community but what do I know! There's 12 clubs going to SGM and that's 10 of them I know, Edinburgh City Reserves another, who Team 12 is I'm not sure but I don't think it's Sauchie CFC. I heard they were going to use Little Kerse but that doesn't meet requirements I don't think so that could be the issue. I don't think it's Letham either. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sure & Stedfast Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 (edited) 16 minutes ago, 8MileBU said: What’s the issue with Sauchie Community? No suitable nominated home ground. So, if BU Juniors weren’t rebranding and applying to the East, BU would have likely been looking at the real prospect of ground sharing with either Syngenta (now found a ground sharing home elsewhere) or Sauchie Community as EOSFL teams at Newtown Park, with the landlords commercially bound to plug the gap in income, previously being received from the Juniors. Edited April 11, 2021 by Sure & Stedfast 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluebell1 Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 3 minutes ago, TheGeneral10 said: As a club official you are making a rip roaring t£&t of yourself now tbh. Of course it was democratic and to state otherwise shows ignorance and stupidity of the highest order. Never got your way. Dummy spat. Toys out the pram. Ach well, have enjoyed the last week or so on here. But your correct as a club official a maybe shouldn’t post. It is what it is, don’t agree with the decision nor the way it was done, raises more questions than answers but need to get on with it a suppose. Looking forward to meeting you next season general and aw the best to burnie as well. Parties in dunbar and Blackburn tonite and here’s me being old skool and hoping football is decided on the park . Vote to play surely 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Truthteller Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 4 minutes ago, bluebell1 said: Ach well, have enjoyed the last week or so on here. But your correct as a club official a maybe shouldn’t post. It is what it is, don’t agree with the decision nor the way it was done, raises more questions than answers but need to get on with it a suppose. Looking forward to meeting you next season general and aw the best to burnie as well. Parties in dunbar and Blackburn tonite and here’s me being old skool and hoping football is decided on the park . Vote to play surely No chance of that bluebell, it's all about the handshakes 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swifty Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 13 minutes ago, Truthteller said: No chance of that bluebell, it's all about the handshakes It's all about adhering to what was agreed and not moving the goalposts. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
8MileBU Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 (edited) 36 minutes ago, Sure & Stedfast said: No suitable nominated home ground. So, if BU Juniors weren’t rebranding and applying to the East, BU would have likely been looking at the real prospect of ground sharing with either Syngenta (now found a ground sharing home elsewhere) or Sauchie Community as EOSFL teams at Newtown Park, with the landlords commercially bound to plug the gap in income, previously being received from the Juniors. Wouldn’t have objected to either to be honest. Did Sauchie Juniors not support the idea of Sauchie Community sharing Beechwood then? Edited April 11, 2021 by 8MileBU 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nimmo's Notes Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 35 minutes ago, Sure & Stedfast said: No suitable nominated home ground. So, if BU Juniors weren’t rebranding and applying to the East, BU would have likely been looking at the real prospect of ground sharing with either Syngenta (now found a ground sharing home elsewhere) or Sauchie Community as EOSFL teams at Newtown Park, with the landlords commercially bound to plug the gap in income, previously being received from the Juniors. Syngenta sharing at Ochilview next season. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burnieman Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 4 minutes ago, Nimmo's Notes said: Syngenta sharing at Ochilview next season. Interesting, I thought they were going down the Grangemouth Stadium route. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stulch Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 I did agree with the proposal to play on until 50% was complete, one reason being, although I'm hopeful, there's a chance there could be a break again in the next twelve months, and imagine being in a similar position next year with three uncompleted seasons and still no first division. However, it wasn't up to me to decide. It was up to the clubs to consult their committee and players. In most organisations you have to be a member for a year before being able to vote. They should have and no doubt have consulted and those eligible have voted. Although as pointed out even if everyone could vote immediately the overall decision wouldn't have changed. So fair enough, the decision has been made... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dev Posted April 11, 2021 Author Share Posted April 11, 2021 1 minute ago, stulch said: I did agree with the proposal to play on until 50% was complete, one reason being, although I'm hopeful, there's a chance there could be a break again in the next twelve months, and imagine being in a similar position next year with three uncompleted seasons and still no first division. However, it wasn't up to me to decide. It was up to the clubs to consult their committee and players. In most organisations you have to be a member for a year before being able to vote. They should have and no doubt have consulted and those eligible have voted. Although as pointed out even if everyone could vote immediately the overall decision wouldn't have changed. So fair enough, the decision has been made... Now that Null and Void has been chosen does that open up PPG again but based on the league matches already played? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heedthebaa Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 2 hours ago, Pyramidic said: I fear for the lower strength sides such as Eyemouth. I want them to survive A quick route to the bottom tier will assist their survival in my view. I wouldn’t hold your breathe tbh 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burnieman Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 16 minutes ago, Dev said: Now that Null and Void has been chosen does that open up PPG again but based on the league matches already played? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dev Posted April 11, 2021 Author Share Posted April 11, 2021 2 minutes ago, Burnieman said: Read elsewhere that it will be brought up. Seeing as the vote was about playing again this season or not and PPG was specifically stated as not something being voted on then why not? If it's good enough for Tier 5? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stulch Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 Read elsewhere that it will be brought up. Seeing as the vote was about playing again this season or not and PPG was specifically stated as not something being voted on then why not? If it's good enough for Tier 5?That's not what null and void is. The LL & HL did PPG and not null and void. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burnieman Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 10 minutes ago, Dev said: Read elsewhere that it will be brought up. Seeing as the vote was about playing again this season or not and PPG was specifically stated as not something being voted on then why not? If it's good enough for Tier 5? The vote was about declaring the season null and void or restart after 17th May. The season is now finished. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gaswork Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 Shambles, lunatics really are running the asylum in the eosfl. Horrific -4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burnieman Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 Just now, gaswork said: Shambles, lunatics really are running the asylum in the eosfl. Horrific The dribbling mess has spoken. 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlanCamelonfan Posted April 12, 2021 Share Posted April 12, 2021 11 hours ago, Burnieman said: Interesting, I thought they were going down the Grangemouth Stadium route. I think stenny were looking for someone to ground share with them since lost shire. It was one of the options for us to get a licence if carmuirs didnt make it 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.