craigkillie Posted April 3, 2022 Share Posted April 3, 2022 The 48 team format for 2026 will be so unfathomably shite that they'll move to 64 for 2030. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charger29 Posted April 3, 2022 Share Posted April 3, 2022 The 48 team format for 2026 will be so unfathomably shite that they'll move to 64 for 2030.Surely that'd be far too late to up the number of teams?They'll try the other 48 team method they looked at i.e. 16 automatic group stage qualifiers and a 32 team playoff round before the groups.After that they'll look at jumping to 64 for 2034. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craigkillie Posted April 3, 2022 Share Posted April 3, 2022 I can't see why it would be too late. Qualifying wouldn't have started and the hosts probably aren't going to mind. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bully Wee Villa Posted April 3, 2022 Share Posted April 3, 2022 (edited) Maybe they will move to 64 teams as a trial in celebration of the centenary, then just stick with it. I was disappointed Copa America chose not to stick with the sixteen team format they employed for their own centenary edition. Much better than the twelve team or the laughable ten team format with 8/10 going through. Edited April 3, 2022 by Bully Wee Villa 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donathan Posted April 3, 2022 Share Posted April 3, 2022 12 minutes ago, Bully Wee Villa said: Maybe they will move to 64 teams as a trial in celebration of the centenary, then just stick with it. I was disappointed Copa America chose not to stick with the sixteen team format they employed for their own centenary edition. Much better than the twelve team or the laughable ten team format with 8/10 going through. If we end up with a 64 team world cup then the South American qualifiers will become even more laughable than that. They're going to have 6.5 slots in a 48 team tournament. So, in a 64 team effort you'd be looking at 8 or 9 qualifiers from the 10 countries in CONMEBOL. A 2-year long, 18 game round robin to eliminate 1 or 2 teams. If that happens they'll probably rebrand it as a South American version of the nations league and attach some prestige to actually topping the qualifiers, with the qualifying itself just being part of the puzzle. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bully Wee Villa Posted April 3, 2022 Share Posted April 3, 2022 My ideal choice would be merging the Americas. Don't know if it will ever happen. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunning1874 Posted April 3, 2022 Share Posted April 3, 2022 (edited) 26 minutes ago, Bully Wee Villa said: My ideal choice would be merging the Americas. Don't know if it will ever happen. Merging the CONMEBOL/CONCACAF & AFC/OFC qualifiers would really be necessary with a 64 team tournament, but it's never happening. Shite like the US know fine well how easy they have it just now and aren't giving up that advantage. Regardless of the tournament size I still favour reducing the number of automatic places for each continent and having huge all in intercontinental playoffs where you can't draw a team from your own continent. Every continent still gets automatic places so you still have global representation, every continent's representatives get a chance to prove they're good enough and deserve their places on merit rather than through an accident of geography. No one can whine about another continent getting too many places or their own getting too few if you're all getting 16 teams into a massive intercontinental playoff. Edited April 3, 2022 by Dunning1874 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bully Wee Villa Posted April 3, 2022 Share Posted April 3, 2022 Not for me. Even though would potentially benefit Scotland. I like the diverse nature of the World Cup seeing diddy teams you wouldn't normally see. A format that just had loads and loads of Europeans at the expense of African and Asian teams would be less fun. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donathan Posted April 3, 2022 Share Posted April 3, 2022 25 minutes ago, Dunning1874 said: Merging the CONMEBOL/CONCACAF & AFC/OFC qualifiers would really be necessary with a 64 team tournament, but it's never happening. Shite like the US know fine well how easy they have it just now and aren't giving up that advantage. Regardless of the tournament size I still favour reducing the number of automatic places for each continent and having huge all in intercontinental playoffs where you can't draw a team from your own continent. Every continent still gets automatic places so you still have global representation, every continent's representatives get a chance to prove they're good enough and deserve their places on merit rather than through an accident of geography. No one can whine about another continent getting too many places or their own getting too few if you're all getting 16 teams into a massive intercontinental playoff. The USA would still coast through a joint Americas qualifying for a 64 team World Cup, they’d probably be looking at 14 places. The entire CONMEBOL region could qualify and the USA would still likely come in the top 4 of the North American sides. And I’d expect them to finish above diddies like Bolivia and Venezuela. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bully Wee Villa Posted April 3, 2022 Share Posted April 3, 2022 (edited) Europe 20 Americas 14 Africa 15 Asia/Oceania 15 If it was up to me. No intercontinental playoffs... teams should know whether they've qualified when the draw is made (obviously wars and other disasters excepted). Edited April 3, 2022 by Bully Wee Villa 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donathan Posted April 4, 2022 Share Posted April 4, 2022 10 hours ago, Bully Wee Villa said: Europe 20 Americas 14 Africa 15 Asia/Oceania 15 If it was up to me. No intercontinental playoffs... teams should know whether they've qualified when the draw is made (obviously wars and other disasters excepted). Give Europe an extra 4 at the expense of 2 each from Africa and Asia/Oceania imo. 24 European slots would allow the qualifying to use the same format as the euros qualifying. Also I’d just keep Asia and Oceania separate and have 11 Asians, 11 Africans and 2 Oceanians for the banter 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bully Wee Villa Posted April 4, 2022 Share Posted April 4, 2022 (edited) Two Oceanians would be a good laugh but I'd rather have more African and Asian diddies than some boring Slovenia type team. And I'll happily never watch Israel play ever again. Imagine the fun when Italy somehow fail to qualify again and they have to sit at home watching Chad vs Cook Islands. Edited April 4, 2022 by Bully Wee Villa 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donathan Posted April 4, 2022 Share Posted April 4, 2022 1 hour ago, Bully Wee Villa said: Two Oceanians would be a good laugh but I'd rather have more African and Asian diddies than some boring Slovenia type team. And I'll happily never watch Israel play ever again. Imagine the fun when Italy somehow fail to qualify again and they have to sit at home watching Chad vs Cook Islands. We are a “boring Slovenia type team” 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eez-eh Posted April 4, 2022 Share Posted April 4, 2022 13 hours ago, Bully Wee Villa said: Europe 20 Americas 14 Africa 15 Asia/Oceania 15 If it was up to me. No intercontinental playoffs... teams should know whether they've qualified when the draw is made (obviously wars and other disasters excepted). Seeing it broken down like that it hits home how much utter shite will be making it to the World Cup when they inevitably change it to 64 teams. 32 was fine. 48 would probably be just about alright but the format is so bad it will never last. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bully Wee Villa Posted April 4, 2022 Share Posted April 4, 2022 42 minutes ago, Donathan said: We are a “boring Slovenia type team” Yes, quite possibly. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bully Wee Villa Posted April 4, 2022 Share Posted April 4, 2022 21 minutes ago, eez-eh said: Seeing it broken down like that it hits home how much utter shite will be making it to the World Cup when they inevitably change it to 64 teams. 32 was fine. 48 would probably be just about alright but the format is so bad it will never last. For "fun", who might have qualified for a 64 team format using the above allocations and based on most recent qualifying campaign. I have split the Americas 7/7 and Asia/Oceania 14/1 Europe: Serbia, Spain, Switzerland, France, Belgium, Denmark, Netherlands, Croatia, England, Germany, Portugal, Scotland, Italy, Russia, Sweden, Wales, Turkey, Poland, North Macedonia, Ukraine, Austria Africa: Senegal, Cameroon, Ghana, Morocco, Tunisia, Egypt, Algeria, Nigeria, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Mali, Côte d'Ivoire, South Africa, Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde Americas: Canada, Mexico, United States of America, Costa Rica, Panama, Jamaica, El Salvador, Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Ecuador, Peru, Colombia, Chile Asia/Oceania: Qatar, Iran, South Korea, United Arab Emirates, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Japan, Australia, Oman, China, Vietnam, Tajikistan, New Zealand 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merkie84 Posted April 4, 2022 Share Posted April 4, 2022 At what stage is it just too big and unwieldy? Even someone like me who absolutely loves the World Cup struggles to watch all the games in a 32 team tournament. No chance with a 48 or 64 team WC. Might end up like the cricket World Cup where the first round is just a procession for the big teams until the real tournament starts in the knockouts. Less jeopardy and fewer surprises might start affecting viewing figures like has been happening in the early stages of the champions league. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charger29 Posted April 4, 2022 Share Posted April 4, 2022 This is an example of a 64 team WC given by a draw simulator: 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salvo Montalbano Posted April 4, 2022 Share Posted April 4, 2022 2 hours ago, charger29 said: This is an example of a 64 team WC given by a draw simulator: FFS, we can't even qualify for that? And Kyrgyzstan and NI do! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bully Wee Villa Posted April 4, 2022 Share Posted April 4, 2022 FFS, Clarke out! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.