Jump to content

Kilmarnock v 10IAR Heroes


Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, RossBFaeDundee said:

Just watched the highlights. Colin Doyle is not a particularly good goalkeeper.

 

First time I've ever seen him, had to look up who he was. Looked really poor - crazy decision making for the penalty, standing like a statue for Edouard's one on one, lettuce wrists for the penalty. Brown's header wasn't unsavable either for a keeper who can move their feet to get across. Wouldn't be very encouraged if I was a Killie fan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Diamonds are Forever said:

 

First time I've ever seen him, had to look up who he was. Looked really poor - crazy decision making for the penalty, standing like a statue for Edouard's one on one, lettuce wrists for the penalty. Brown's header wasn't unsavable either for a keeper who can move their feet to get across. Wouldn't be very encouraged if I was a Killie fan.

He makes the 2 clowns we had last year look like Neuer. We'd be better off without a goalie and sticking an extra man in midfield than having him in nets. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Coooombe said:

He makes the 2 clowns we had last year look like Neuer. We'd be better off without a goalie and sticking an extra man in midfield than having him in nets. 

I could've got to the ball quicker for the penalty incident and i'm in The Netherlands, utterly bizarre how slow he reacted, it was like he'd won a "be a goalie for a day" competition. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, gannonball said:

I appreciate I am looking at this through green tinted specs but I saw decent contact and there is no chance he is getting banned.

Can’t ban him for that, he got to the ball 1st, felt contact and went down. If their keeper hadn’t touched him then fair enough but this should be thrown out. 
 

 

 

 

 

6934A792-6A3E-4378-919D-B4D87DAB48CD.png

Edited by Drew Brees
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Drew Brees said:

Can’t ban him for that, he got to the ball 1st, felt contact and went down. If their keeper hadn’t touched him then fair enough but this should be thrown out. 
 

 

 

 

 

 

6934A792-6A3E-4378-919D-B4D87DAB48CD.png

I find it very strange hes been cited tbh, opening up a can of worms with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, gannonball said:

I find it very strange hes been cited tbh, opening up a can of worms with it.


He made a meal of it but there was contact so it comes down to an argument over whether there's enough proof to suggest it wasn't enough to go down, which is subjective. A soft foul is still a foul.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jim McLean's Ghost said:

There is no contact on his right leg which suddenly loses all capacity to function due to his left foot being touched. (reminder that benig touched is not a foul, football is a contact sport)

It is a clear dive.

Wouldn’t the contact to his left ankle be enough to warrant a penalty? He gets to the ball before the keeper is is impeded. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...