Jump to content

Dundee v Ayr United


Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, Ludo*1 said:

Mark Kerr's interview is behind a paywall but sounds like he's backing Dundee.

He agrees with McPake and said game should have gone ahead , both teams were happy to start game 

Edited by Robbo63
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ludo*1 said:

I think, could be wrong because it is ambigious but both clubs thought the pitch was playable. The ref gave his reason for postponing the game and then we requested extra time to sort out what his issue was which was rejected as he'd fucked off home before we'd even got in touch with the league.

So what exactly is Dundee FC's point in whining to the SPFL, the SFA, probably the UN Security Council as well at this rate?

The onus is on the club to produce a park that is playable when it is inspected. It is not on the referee to bend over backwards and delay kick-off to let your club do extra work on it. What both clubs have to say about whether it was playable or not is also completely irrelevant.

A full-blown minter from the club and anyone who buys into their hilarious sense of injustice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, virginton said:

So what exactly is Dundee FC's point in whining to the SPFL, the SFA, probably the UN Security Council as well at this rate?

The onus is on the club to produce a park that is playable when it is inspected. It is not on the referee to bend over backwards and delay kick-off to let your club do extra work on it. What both clubs have to say about whether it was playable or not is also completely irrelevant.

A full-blown minter from the club and anyone who buys into their hilarious sense of injustice.

We did produce a park that was deemed playable when it was inspected by an SFA-appointed official. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, virginton said:

So what exactly is Dundee FC's point in whining to the SPFL, the SFA, probably the UN Security Council as well at this rate?

The onus is on the club to produce a park that is playable when it is inspected. It is not on the referee to bend over backwards and delay kick-off to let your club do extra work on it. What both clubs have to say about whether it was playable or not is also completely irrelevant.

A full-blown minter from the club and anyone who buys into their hilarious sense of injustice.

Yet another Morton fan that's clearly not read the thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, The Master said:

We did produce a park that was deemed playable when it was inspected by an SFA-appointed official. 

It wasn't playable when the actual match official turned up. This happens all the time.

So having punted out your first complaint, we'd then turn to your gormless club officials chasing after a referee's car and insisting that they stick around to give more time to sort out your nick of a pitch. I'm sure they'll take your club's tantrum complaint very seriously then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, virginton said:

It wasn't playable when the actual match official turned up. This happens all the time.

So having punted out your first complaint, we'd then turn to your gormless club officials chasing after a referee's car and insisting that they stick around to give more time to sort out your nick of a pitch. I'm sure they'll take your club's tantrum complaint very seriously then.

f**k up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, virginton said:

It wasn't playable when the actual match official turned up. This happens all the time.

Nothing happened in the intervening period to make it unplayable. 

That means one of the officials made an incorrect assessment. It is therefore not unreasonable to ask the SFA to investigate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ludo*1 said:

The thread is about to become a cluttered mess with his shite.

He’s better off ignored. If anyone made the mistake I did of watching his rabble last night he’s the last person on this forum who should be lecturing about the state of pitches.

Edited by RossDee01
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, virginton said:

It wasn't playable when the actual match official turned up. This happens all the time.

So having punted out your first complaint, we'd then turn to your gormless club officials chasing after a referee's car and insisting that they stick around to give more time to sort out your nick of a pitch. I'm sure they'll take your club's tantrum complaint very seriously then.

f**k off clown boy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He’s better off ignored. If anyone made the mistake I did of watching his rabble last night he’s the last person on this forum who should be lecturing about the state of pitches.


It was like a tattie field after harvest. Anyway tick tock, tick tock.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RossBFaeDundee said:

McPake unhappy and Munro explains his decision. Sounds like he didn't even give the proposition of an hour's delay serious thought.

https://www.eveningtelegraph.co.uk/fp/dundee-boss-james-mcpake-says-referee-was-wrong-to-call-off-ayr-clash-after-inspection-confusion/

McPake paints himself in to a corner by saying they should have played then stopped if the pitch was dangerous.  The ref would argue that as precisely why he wasnt prepared to risk it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...