Jump to content

French teacher beheaded


ICTChris

Recommended Posts

41 minutes ago, Hedgecutter said:

I watched a talk last week about a cave in Moray that I'd previously been into, in which children were previously decapitated.

Could have been me.

what done it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ralstonite said:

Personally, I am now ambivalent about the death penalty. I was once in favour of it, then opposed to it for moral and religious reasons, and now I've been reading that it might be justifiable biblically.

Quote

Then the Lord spoke to Moses, saying, "Bring out of the camp the one who cursed, and let all who heard him lay their hands on his head, and let all the congregation stone him. And speak to the people of Israel, saying, Whoever curses his God shall bear his sin. Whoever blasphemes the name of the Lord shall surely be put to death. All the congregation shall stone him. The sojourner as well as the native, when he blasphemes the Name, shall be put to death."

Leviticus 24:13-16

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, welshbairn said:

Leviticus 24:13-16

Is from the Old Testament, and the Jewish Torah. Unlike Judaism though, Christians believe in the teachings of Jesus who was merciful - indeed He had the humblest of origins, being born in a stable, had no home or possessions and was crucified for our sins. He spent His life healing the sick, He associated with those shunned (lepers) and despised (tax collectors) by society. He instructed us "to turn the other cheek" and to "go the extra mile". When a prostitute was to be stoned, He rescued the lady, instructing those without sin to cast the first stone.

Really and truly, Jesus' words should abrogate everything in the Old Testament. 

Mohammed on the other hand, had four wives, including a child bride (Aisha), was a slave master and trader and led an army which conquered cities and slaughter thousands. Which one did God really send?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ralstonite said:

Is from the Old Testament, and the Jewish Torah. Unlike Judaism though, Christians believe in the teachings of Jesus who was merciful - indeed He had the humblest of origins, being born in a stable, had no home or possessions and was crucified for our sins. He spent His life healing the sick, He associated with those shunned (lepers) and despised (tax collectors) by society. He instructed us "to turn the other cheek" and to "go the extra mile". When a prostitute was to be stoned, He rescued the lady, instructing those without sin to cast the first stone.

Really and truly, Jesus' words should abrogate everything in the Old Testament. 

Mohammed on the other hand, had four wives, including a child bride (Aisha), was a slave master and trader and led an army which conquered cities and slaughter thousands. Which one did God really send?

Jesus respected the word of the Old Testament, which you appear to reject. Did you find your biblical justification for capital punishment in the New Testament? If so where?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Shotgun said:

You're correct and that was the motivation behind its development by M. Guillotine. He was horrified by the way his invention was used during the French revolution.

If I invented a machine for chopping peoples' heads off I too would be horrified if it was used to chop peoples' heads off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Inanimate Carbon Rod said:

Some of the shit that the bible says people should be killed for is barmy (including eating prawns). For anyone to try and use the bible as a method of justifying capital punishment is just bewildering. 

The Old Testament contains some seriously fucked up shit. Bigots of the American persuasion frequently cherry pick from it to justify their prejudices (it's God's law after all) so it can be handy to question why they don't follow the other rules forbidding such crimes as "letting your hair become unkempt", "going to church within 33 days of giving birth to a boy or 66 days if it's a girl", "mixing fabrics in clothing", "trimming your beard or getting tattoos", or "not standing in the presence of the elderly" among others. Many of these should be punishable by death and yet, few Christians worry overly much about them, or the rules for how to treat slaves. But "having sex with a man as with a woman"? A disturbing number of them know the exact chapter and verse where that's forbidden.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Ralstonite said:

Really and truly, Jesus' words should abrogate everything in the Old Testament. 

“Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?”

Jesus replied: “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’ This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’ 

Few rationally minded people would disagree with that. And then there's this.

ir164_holy-hate_westboro-tiller-protest-112896171.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, welshbairn said:

Jesus respected the word of the Old Testament, which you appear to reject. Did you find your biblical justification for capital punishment in the New Testament? If so where?

I wrote that I thought it 'might be' justifiable, but yes, it was the Old Testament - Genesis 9:6: 'Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed'. The Vatican says that capital punishment is now totally wrong in all circumstances, and so as a Catholic I should accept that. However a number of traditional Catholics believe that it is justified, and some believe the current pope is not legitimate (see Sedevacantism, Vatican II). 

If we as a society regressed to a state in which food was scarce and we could no longer imprison people for long periods of time, then what would one do with a serial murderer?! Is there such thing as universal justice, or is a 'just' punishment dependent on the affluence of society? Maybe proper justice for a murderer should be that he too shall have his life taken? I honestly cannot say with great conviction what I believe.

1 minute ago, Miguel Sanchez said:

If I invented a machine for chopping peoples' heads off I too would be horrified if it was used to chop peoples' heads off.

But what if the alternative was people being torn limb from limb by a mob?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Miguel Sanchez said:

If I invented a machine for chopping peoples' heads off I too would be horrified if it was used to chop peoples' heads off.

Chuckle. Good point but what I meant was, M. Guillotine's goal was to provide a more humane way of dispatching criminals than the other methods in use at the time. He didn't expect it to be used for the wholesale slaughter of people who in many cases, hadn't really done anything wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Ralstonite said:

wrote that I thought it 'might be' justifiable, but yes, it was the Old Testament - Genesis 9:6: 'Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed'. The Vatican says that capital punishment is now totally wrong in all circumstances, and so as a Catholic I should accept that. However a number of traditional Catholics believe that it is justified, and some believe the current pope is not legitimate.

You do realise that by basing the right to take someone's life on a particular interpretation of ancient texts, you have much in common with the man who chopped the teacher's head off? Curious as to why you would accept the Word in Genesis but not in Leviticus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Miguel Sanchez said:

If I invented a machine for chopping peoples' heads off I too would be horrified if it was used to chop peoples' heads off.

 

40 minutes ago, Shotgun said:

Chuckle. Good point but what I meant was, M. Guillotine's goal was to provide a more humane way of dispatching criminals than the other methods in use at the time. He didn't expect it to be used for the wholesale slaughter of people who in many cases, hadn't really done anything wrong.

That it got used very liberally on the aristocracy probably had something to do with it as well.

Edited by NotThePars
Link to comment
Share on other sites

IIRC the nobility wanted to find a method of execution that was as pain-free as possible after the mess they made of chopping Mary Queen of Scots' head off (it took the axeman three goes). After all, they knew that it could be them next.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, welshbairn said:

You do realise that by basing the right to take someone's life on a particular interpretation of ancient texts, you have much in common with the man who chopped the teacher's head off? Curious as to why you would accept the Word in Genesis but not in Leviticus.

I'm not familiar with Leviticus. I'll be honest, I haven't read most of the Old Testament and only do so to read prophecy (e.g. Daniel, Isaiah). Jesus' arrival signified God's new covenant with man, and therefore Christians are no longer obligated to follow the ceremonial laws and customs of the Old Testament. It's the same reason why Christians don't need to be circumcised, sacrifice animals, etc.

By your definition, most of the population of the world have 'much in common with the man who chopped the teacher's head off', as do most people who have ever lived. 

Jews and Muslims have far more in common with one another than either of them do with Christians. Interestingly I tried to have a civil conversation and debate with a Jew once and he told me he had far more respect for Muslims as Islam's a truly monotheistic faith, whereas Christians like me are polytheistic because of our belief in the Trinity.

But both Muslims and Jews adhere to ceremonial laws which is why both adhere to dietary laws (halal and kosher), get circumcised. Both have particular colours (green for Islam, blue for Judaism), and both pray a set number of times per day.

In many ways Islam can be seen to be a continuation of the customs and traditions of Judaism. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, welshbairn said:

Jesus respected the word of the Old Testament, which you appear to reject. Did you find your biblical justification for capital punishment in the New Testament? If so where?

Tbf capital punishment is fairly central to the new testament.

And as sound as the Jesus character undoubtedly is the book of Revelations in the NT raises the bar on nuttiness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...