Jump to content

Hibs vs Accies


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, YER SISTERS YER MAW said:
4 minutes ago, Green Day said:
Really?

Yes. He was clean through on the keeper.

^Classic "Yer Da" answer

Actual reason - 

"Players who commit a foul to deny a goalscoring opportunity will no longer automatically be sent off, football's rule-making body has confirmed.

The previous 'triple-punishment' rule required a red card - and therefore a suspension - as well as the award of a penalty under those circumstances.

However, players committing accidental fouls that deny a goalscoring chance will now be cautioned instead.

But deliberate fouls will still incur a red card."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^Classic "Yer Da" answer
Actual reason - 
"Players who commit a foul to deny a goalscoring opportunity will no longer automatically be sent off, football's rule-making body has confirmed.
The previous 'triple-punishment' rule required a red card - and therefore a suspension - as well as the award of a penalty under those circumstances.
However, players committing accidental fouls that deny a goalscoring chance will now be cautioned instead.
But deliberate fouls will still incur a red card."
Accidental [emoji23]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, YER SISTERS YER MAW said:
5 minutes ago, Green Day said:
In the refs opinion.
FFS, we gave you 2 penalties and an og, what more do you need????

I doubt any player means to give away a penalty on purpose, so you'd expect 99% of penalties to be classed as accidental fouls then if that's the case. Stupid rule.

Maybe 99% of fouls in the penalty area don't warrant a red card, then, yah? The penalty and possible booking is punishment enough.

Edited by Aim Here
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, YER SISTERS YER MAW said:
5 minutes ago, Aim Here said:
Maybe 99% of fouls in the penalty area don't warrant a red card, then, yah? The penalty and possible booking is punishment enough.

Well if that's the new rule then yes. Let's see if they apply the same rule every game.

You're new to Scottish fitba', aren't you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, YER SISTERS YER MAW said:
7 minutes ago, Aim Here said:
Maybe 99% of fouls in the penalty area don't warrant a red card, then, yah? The penalty and possible booking is punishment enough.

Well if that's the new rule then yes. Let's see if they apply the same rule every game.

They only created the rule so they could apply it to every team with the exception of Hamilton m8. Top trolls imho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, YER SISTERS YER MAW said:
9 minutes ago, Aim Here said:
Maybe 99% of fouls in the penalty area don't warrant a red card, then, yah? The penalty and possible booking is punishment enough.

Well if that's the new rule then yes. Let's see if they apply the same rule every game.

It's been the rule for years.

There's a big difference between mistiming a tackle and pulling a players shirt/handling a goal bound shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, YER SISTERS YER MAW said:
24 minutes ago, Aim Here said:
Maybe 99% of fouls in the penalty area don't warrant a red card, then, yah? The penalty and possible booking is punishment enough.

Well if that's the new rule then yes. Let's see if they apply the same rule every game.

So your issue is the rule then rather than the decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 points from 10 games is absolutely class btw, was probably in a minority but wasn’t convinced by Jack Ross and the performances overall haven’t been as good as I would like but if we keep picking up points and carrying on like this there’s a really could chance we could challenge Aberdeen.


£250k

Down the drain 

Kevin Nisbet 

Scores again

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought it probably was a red card and based on the penalties Motherwell give away on Sunday I think we probably should have had a 3rd penalty for handball, however given how poor we were against Kilmarnock's 10 men and how much we were outclassed for 80 minutes tonight it's difficult to feel too hard done by.

The first 45 minutes were brutal and sum up most of Rice's Accies managerial career - no consistency in selection, no ideas, no identity, no threat, no press. The second 45 minutes were an improvement and mostly due to Ogkmboe looking like a proper player again for the first time this season (maybe Gogic was coaching him) holding the ball up well, running channels and getting us up the pitch. I see he's getting hammered on Twitter for the penalty miss but Oggy is our best striker and if he keeps that level of performance should be a starter every week. On 70 minutes Rice had another moment of inspiration and realised that if you want to score goals then pace and width are quite important - Smith and Tunde came on and suddenly we looked capable of scoring (helped by removing Scott Martin a player who is playing 2 divisions above his level).

We got away without the heavy defeat that our performance deserved tonight, will Rice learn from it - probably not.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...