Jump to content

EPL 20/21


Derry Alli

Recommended Posts

My view on VAR has always been that any review must be initiated by the on field referee. I really don't like the idea of a bunch of officials not at the game asking the referee to look at something. Without wanting to get into amateur psychology, if you are called over as a referee to look at an incident you must be aware that the VAR officials think it is a red card, therefore immediately you are on the look out for anything at all that could be a red card offence, and it must feel a lot easier giving a red knowing that other officials think it is. It would take a brave person to publicly disagree with them. Dean usually looks very confident and arsey when giving a red card, I thought he looked almost embarrassed tonight, as if he didn't want to but felt he had to.

Goal line technology and offside (to a lesser extent) are more objective decisions where technology can intervene on the playing field, but things like this should not be being highlighted by officials not at the game. It may well be that Mike Dean would have asked to see it and sent him off anyway but I think it's less likely.

As I say, other than offside and goal line technology, I think VAR should only be in the form of a replay at the on-field referee's request. Undoubtedly it would mean that certain things get missed, but there is no perfect solution here and I think that is the best happy medium available.

Edited by Diamonds are Forever
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It should not be left solely to a referee to determine whether he has made the correct decision or needs extra help. Half the referees in football would stick to their guns and refuse any review of their shocking decisions. There needs to be scope for the managers to make a limited number of challenges - but beyond that there should be no intervention. 

This has to apply for offside as well because the decisions are not objective when it comes to the ridiculous degree of pixel-interpretation that VAR has already boiled down to. Let the assistant make their call on the park and if either manager wants to risk a challenge on the decision then that should be allowed. 

Edited by vikingTON
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually feel a bit sorry for the Referees now. 

I think that going down the rabbit hole of having ‘ there is contact therefore it’s a foul’  is one of the main problems. It means that players play acting when they feel the slightest touch means the ref has to now treat that as a foul and clearly accidental contact is punished as a foul. This leads to harsher than deserved punishment because if it’s accidental it’s often not when attempting to get the ball so it’s treated as a red.

VAR now means that there is less room for common sense in decision making which I think that refs did use before it.  Being seen to not correctly apply the rules will probably result in them getting into trouble, so you end up with what we have now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Diamonds are Forever said:

My view on VAR has always been that any review must be initiated by the on field referee. I really don't like the idea of a bunch of officials not at the game asking the referee to look at something. Without wanting to get into amateur psychology, if you are called over as a referee to look at an incident you must be aware that the VAR officials think it is a red card, therefore immediately you are on the look out for anything at all that could be a red card offence, and it must feel a lot easier giving a red knowing that other officials think it is. It would take a brave person to publicly disagree with them. Dean usually looks very confident and arsey when giving a red card, I thought he looked almost embarrassed tonight, as if he didn't want to but felt he had to.

Goal line technology and offside (to a lesser extent) are more objective decisions where technology can intervene on the playing field, but things like this should not be being highlighted by officials not at the game. It may well be that Mike Dean would have asked to see it and sent him off anyway but I think it's less likely.

As I say, other than offside and goal line technology, I think VAR should only be in the form of a replay at the on-field referee's request. Undoubtedly it would mean that certain things get missed, but there is no perfect solution here and I think that is the best happy medium available.

Regarding the psychology I sort of agree - wonder as well if the timing of theincidents plays a part too?

at a personal level I can barely be fucked at the tail end of my shifts some days, so a referee doing a VAR review might well make a decision later on in a match (going by that clip at 90+7mins) than they perhaps would call differently if it happens early on. tired legs from running about keeping up with play, stress, aggravation from players doing their best Wayne Rooney impression and calling him a c**t every time a call goes against them etc. etc.

whatever the case would agree with VT above that getting referees to scrutinise their own calls is a poor idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jambomo said:

 

I think that going down the rabbit hole of having ‘ there is contact therefore it’s a foul’  is one of the main problems. It means that players play acting when they feel the slightest touch means the ref has to now treat that as a foul and clearly accidental contact is punished as a foul. 

Can't fully agree, as 'accidental contact' should absolutely be punished by a foul if it genuinely impedes the opponent. If you jump for a punt up the park, swing your arm and accidentally clobber someone with it then it's a foul. If you accidentally trip someone when trying to track their run then it's a foul. The 'deliberate' nature of it should only change the severity of the punishment, not the decision to award a foul. 

Not all contact impedes an opponent though which is where the issue lies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, virginton said:

Can't fully agree, as 'accidental contact' should absolutely be punished by a foul if it genuinely impedes the opponent. If you jump for a punt up the park, swing your arm and accidentally clobber someone with it then it's a foul. If you accidentally trip someone when trying to track their run then it's a foul. The 'deliberate' nature of it should only change the severity of the punishment, not the decision to award a foul. 

Not all contact impedes an opponent though which is where the issue lies.

And if you dive from the slightest touch to get an opponent sent off, you should be retrospectively punished to stop people doing it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...