Jump to content

St. Johnstone v Aberdeen (The Massey-Ferguson Main Event)


Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, The Marly said:
1 hour ago, Romeo said:
If the players were told they could go out for a beer them there's nothing can be done. They wouldn't know that particular bar was going to be hoaching with covid.

If the players were told they could go out for a beer then the blame moves from the individuals to the club. If that's the case then Aberdeen should be punished severely.

If we're dealing with imaginary scenarios i'd expect the SFA to expel St Johnstone if they were involved in an international sex trafficking racket. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's crazy. 

Would you be raging because a work colleague went for a pint?

If them going for a pint jeopardised my living I probably would aye. And this absolutely does jeopardise their living. If the league is called off clubs are going into administration.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Valentino Bolognese said:

 

A comparable situation might be if a team goes out the night before a game night and gets into a mass brawl, so they're all in the cells and no team can be fielded. Now, should the club be penalised due to the actions of it's players? 

Some Accies players went on strike a few years back, so we could not field a team for a match against Stenhousemuir.

We were docked 13 points and relegated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, coprolite said:

If we're dealing with imaginary scenarios i'd expect the SFA to expel St Johnstone if they were involved in an international sex trafficking racket. 

Actually I thought my analogy was pretty accurate,, and not some spurious straw-man nonsense. 

But yeah, if it was sanctioned, bankrolled and run by the club, obviously.

Do you have a point though?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest bernardblack
Talk that she'll enforce a lockdown on matches again, not just for Aberdeen but for everyone.
She's been fucking desperate to make an example of Scottish football, she's hates the game. This is her chance and she won't miss.


Haha she hates football? Okay m9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, TonyFerrino said:

Not 8 boys who were in the same pub though, presumably more.  Hope they finished the night off with a kebab.  

The English players couldn't have been in the same pub because pubs weren't open for most of the season. The English players were breaching the actual law by doing what they were doing, it's not entirely clear whether the Aberdeen players were - it depends how many (if any) of them live together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Valentino Bolognese said:

Actually I thought my analogy was pretty accurate,, and not some spurious straw-man nonsense. 

But yeah, if it was sanctioned, bankrolled and run by the club, obviously.

Do you have a point though?

 

I thought it was quite obvious. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Marshmallo said:

It certainly looks to be more likely than not baby

It's absolutely immaterial where they contracted the virus TBH. Point is they seem to have been caught breaking the social distancing guidelines. 

That in itself should be dealt with by the club, forcefully in my opinion.

The second matter at hand is that a fixture cannot be played due to an infection in one team's squad. The authorities will have to determine if the club is in any way institutionally responsible for that situation, and act accordingly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, craigkillie said:

The English players couldn't have been in the same pub because pubs weren't open for most of the season. The English players were breaching the actual law by doing what they were doing, it's not entirely clear whether the Aberdeen players were - it depends how many (if any) of them live together.

You could forgive them if they went round to each others house even if it was breaching the number of households socialising together rule as at least that's the same testing bubble etc and if they somehow contracted it from someone's significant other or something that would just unfortunate. 

It's the fact they just 🖕 to the rules and hit a mobbed bar that put them at obvious risk. 

Edited by Mr Positive, sometimes.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Merkland Red said:

Folk blaming the government 🤦🏻‍♂️

Who would be a politician.

Cautious exit from lockdown: Boo, nanny state, stop killing the economy, wee Nippy making it all about her.

Some dafties ruin in for everyone after getting down to f**k all cases: ffs shambles, how could Sturgeon let this happen!!!

jose.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, The Real Saints said:

 

The first post was Kyle’s rather than mine. But regardless, if we were to be ravaged by injuries for the rearranged date, would we be given the same treatment which Aberdeen have received for something which was entirely reckless and self-inflicted? I don’t think we would. The game would probably go ahead. It’s more a statement about the ethics of postponing the game rather than dishing out some form of punishment.

 

It’s in the laws of the game that if you are missing a specific number of first team players you can request a game is postponed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stressball said:

It’s in the laws of the game that if you are missing a specific number of first team players you can request a game is postponed.

Not in the Laws of the Game, more likely as part of specific competition rules.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...