Jump to content

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Arthurlie1981 said:

 


You used to be able to put a clause in the contract that allowed contracts to start but payments not made until competitive games were played. Don’t know if it is still done that way but many clubs used this.

 

So a deferred payment for work done in pre-season?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clubs pay a training wage over the summer once back that covers pre-season matches.

TBH even that was mainly done away with by lots of clubs over the last few years most clubs added the clause “first competitive game until final competitive game”.

As Pars asked above, yeah it was a bit like that where the wage had that built in. It mean that the clubs whose income won’t start until the league cup started and then when the games finished the wages did too. I know of clubs who didn’t have the clause whose played on an all weather pitch and had to continue paying wages until June without income.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting.  The spfl now has rules in place that have the players better protected so contracts now run to end of June/start of July when before it wasn’t uncommon for clubs to chance it and have contracts end immediately after the final games.  I think the PFA must have put abit of pressure on them as there were quite annoyed that clubs were giving out ‘1 year’ deals but were actually only paying 10 months wages.  And then the players deal would run out and they couldn’t get another one until the next season.   Having contracts run out in between transfer windows you could argue is infringing a players ability to work as they can’t be registered to another club.   Less of an issue in the non-league game with no transfer windows but you do have the March 31st deadline to contend with.

As always contracts at this level are generally ok as agreements between club and player and as long as both parties are happy no issue,  however it’s just going to take 1 player to decide they are unhappy and test things legally,  particularly in regards to NWM and the shit will hit the fan  The back pay clubs would need to pay will be Huge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting.  The spfl now has rules in place that have the players better protected so contracts now run to end of June/start of July when before it wasn’t uncommon for clubs to chance it and have contracts end immediately after the final games.  I think the PFA must have put abit of pressure on them as there were quite annoyed that clubs were giving out ‘1 year’ deals but were actually only paying 10 months wages.  And then the players deal would run out and they couldn’t get another one until the next season.   Having contracts run out in between transfer windows you could argue is infringing a players ability to work as they can’t be registered to another club.   Less of an issue in the non-league game with no transfer windows but you do have the March 31st deadline to contend with.
As always contracts at this level are generally ok as agreements between club and player and as long as both parties are happy no issue,  however it’s just going to take 1 player to decide they are unhappy and test things legally,  particularly in regards to NWM and the shit will hit the fan  The back pay clubs would need to pay will be Huge.


For many clubs it won’t matter as players will be signed on amateur contracts so NMW won’t matter.

I think you have me wrong, the contracts didn’t end until the end of the season it was just they weren’t entitled to pay. There is nothing illegal with it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 18/09/2020 at 16:05, timeforchange said:

Ok guys as survey time comes closer let’s have a wee look at the questions 

 

will fans be allowed in ? Don’t know 

will club survive without gate money ?no

Are you allowed to use the showers  ? Don’t know 

is that a health risk in the winter months  ? Possibly yes 

can the full league season be completed ? Don’t know 

how ca  you vote yes on the unknown. Yes we all want to play and watch football . It’s our life and blood but there becomes a point that you have to close the drain. You can’t keep emptying the well . The clubs have had no financial support from the Sfa. The big clubs all got £50,000 to help we got SFA . Some big clubs gave their donation away to their charity foundations could they not have helped out the lower league clubs and gave a donation to the associations. Let’s look very closely at the situation lots of Managers and players  would like season to start they are hoping to get paid but club officials and volunteers are working their baws aff to make sure their clubs survive selling raffles getting sponsorship etc when nobody knows what’s happening unfortunately I think it’s a defo no go this season and hope everybody does the most sensible thing when the survey comes out . Don’t vote on the unknown vote on what info is available . A referee when inspecting the pitch on a wi gers morning can’t say pitch will be thawed out by 2 pm . More clubs will survive and come back a lot stronger if we wait and start next season. 

 

It’s alright saying wait until next season, but who’s to say things are going to be different by then? There may not be a vaccine until 2022/3, do we just can football and “living” until then? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Thereisalight.. said:

It’s alright saying wait until next season, but who’s to say things are going to be different by then? There may not be a vaccine until 2022/3, do we just can football and “living” until then? 

Unless the virus miraculously disappears as quick as it arrived, there may always be cases, hopefully not in large numbers. Seeing as people don't know they've had/got the virus, you can't wrap things in cotton wool forever. Football at non league level with fans should start in October - the professional game is different,30,000 outside a ground is risky. Wear a mask, socially distance, gives the game a chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Andy groundhopper said:

Unless the virus miraculously disappears as quick as it arrived, there may always be cases, ...

Once herd immunity is achieved it should slowly fade as long as it doesn't mutate into a form that people who had it previously have not built up an immune response for. So far the mutation rate has been low fortunately., so that's unlikely.

Herd immunity means there are not enough people available to be infected for R0 to be above one and for the virus to be able to keep spreading to more people. With a highly contagious virus pandemic herd immunity usually happens naturally in any population after two to three months of exponential growth rather than through lockdown and vaccination.

Optimists think we are close to herd immunity already with COVID-19 because it ultimately turned out that a large portion of the population had pre-existing cross-immunity from being exposed to other coronaviruses, so the exponential growth in cases in most western countries at the start of the year was enough to start drastically lowering the R0 making the lockdowns a bit of a waste of time.

 Pessimists ignore the evidence that has been accumulating on cross-immunity and think we are on the brink of a huge second wave of deaths and ICU admissions if restrictions are not reimposed because lockdowns were effective and we are still far away from herd immunity with no vaccine imminent.

It won't be long until there is a very clear picture on which camp is correct, because we have some countries available like Sweden, Belarus and most recently South Africa to compare what happens with fewer restrictions in place.

Governments in the UK are being very cautious right now because they want to be 100% sure the optimistic outlook is correct having already received what appears to have been misleading advice about probable peak severity from experts at the start of the year that led to the huge flap over Dyson ventilators etc.

Edited by LongTimeLurker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have to laugh at this let fans in campaign. 

Good intentions but totally pointless and will go nowhere. 

Do people not realise agree with it or not we are heading only one way more and more local lockdowns, and restrictions on everyday life with strong possibility of another lockdown nationwide for at least a couple of weeks.  This will play out till least the new year making any credible season impossible. 

Football is irrelevant to the decision makers and in the grand scheme of things as much as i love football it really is lowest priority in a health pandemic sooner people realise that the better. 

Edited by rncaa
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, LongTimeLurker said:

Once herd immunity is achieved it should slowly fade as long as it doesn't mutate into a form that people who had it previously have not built up an immune response for. So far the mutation rate has been low fortunately., so that's unlikely.

Herd immunity means there are not enough people available to be infected for R0 to be above one and for the virus to be able to keep spreading to more people. With a highly contagious virus pandemic herd immunity usually happens naturally in any population after two to three months of exponential growth rather than through lockdown and vaccination.

Optimists think we are close to herd immunity already with COVID-19 because it ultimately turned out that a large portion of the population had pre-existing cross-immunity from being exposed to other coronaviruses, so the exponential growth in cases in most western countries at the start of the year was enough to start drastically lowering the R0 making the lockdowns a bit of a waste of time.

 Pessimists ignore the evidence that has been accumulating on cross-immunity and think we are on the brink of a huge second wave of deaths and ICU admissions if restrictions are not reimposed because lockdowns were effective and we are still far away from herd immunity with no vaccine imminent.

It won't be long until there is a very clear picture on which camp is correct, because we have some countries available like Sweden, Belarus and most recently South Africa to compare what happens with fewer restrictions in place.

Governments in the UK are being very cautious right now because they want to be 100% sure the optimistic outlook is correct having already received what appears to have been misleading advice about probable peak severity from experts at the start of the year that led to the huge flap over Dyson ventilators etc.

You support Trump too?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Contracts kick in if they are pros as soon as the clubs ask them to start training. Would you go to your work for nothing for 6 weeks before being asked to do the job for real? An hourly rate doesn't come into it, if you are asked to attend your place of employment you are entitled to NMW whether it's in your contract or not

Couple of points.
Contracts dont kick in til real football starts, so anything agreed between club and players meantime is exactly that, an Agreement.
Never seen a contract yet that mentions hourly rate,not even sure if minimum wage applies either.
 Do some folk actually think clubs should start paying players straight away with no gate money, keep doing so for an indefinite period then just fold when nothing left.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Andy groundhopper said:

My opinion is that covid19 has now become political v science, and the bog end of society will not do as advised, ...

My point was mainly that people shouldn't take what someone is describing in terms of science and make assumptions about their politics. Science should be evidence based and not driven by what you want to happen.

Governments acted earlier this year on the assumption that 100% of the population had no immune system response and the fatality rate for people who became infected would be about 2%.

Under that scenario letting herd immunity unfold naturally was a complete non-starter for most people (Boris Johnson was one of the minority on that). The near complete lack of a response from Jan-Mar in the UK and other western countries was irresponsible in the extreme given that backdrop.

Since then it now looks more like 0.2% on fatality rate (closer to bad flu year territory, basically) and herd immunity kicking in after only 20% get infected because of cross-immunity rather than the 70% expected if everybody had no immune response.

There were some early indications from cruise ships that was probably going to be the case, but I doubt that information guided government policy as the panic over ventilators strongly points to them still expecting the worst case scenario back in late March and early April.

The scientific evidence is now pointing strongly towards the pandemic being largely over in western Europe and lifting restrictions and getting the economy (and by extension but not as importantly WoS) going being the sensible course of action, but the optics of pushing ahead with that while the new cases curve is heading in the wrong direction as efficient testing ramps up are not easy for the politicians.

It will only take a few more weeks for this to be resolved one way or the other, because deaths will have either risen exponentially then peaked in an April to June sort of way or not by that point. The local lockdown measures that are being imposed appear to be about being seen to do something without really reversing most of what has already been opened up again.

If the powers that be thought we were in for a huge problem the new restrictions would be much more stringent. We are unlucky that in a Scottish context that the reopening hadn't included lower level football crowds yet unlike in England, but hang in there a few more weeks and good things should start happening by the looks of things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, LongTimeLurker said:

My point was mainly that people shouldn't take what someone is describing in terms of science and make assumptions about their politics. Science should be evidence based and not driven by what you want to happen.

Governments acted earlier this year on the assumption that 100% of the population had no immune system response and the fatality rate for people who became infected would be about 2%.

Under that scenario letting herd immunity unfold naturally was a complete non-starter for most people (Boris Johnson was one of the minority on that). The near complete lack of a response from Jan-Mar in the UK and other western countries was irresponsible in the extreme given that backdrop.

Since then it now looks more like 0.2% on fatality rate (closer to bad flu year territory, basically) and herd immunity kicking in after only 20% get infected because of cross-immunity rather than the 70% expected if everybody had no immune response.

There were some early indications from cruise ships that was probably going to be the case, but I doubt that information guided government policy as the panic over ventilators strongly points to them still expecting the worst case scenario back in late March and early April.

The scientific evidence is now pointing strongly towards the pandemic being largely over in western Europe and lifting restrictions and getting the economy (and by extension but not as importantly WoS) going being the sensible course of action, but the optics of pushing ahead with that while the new cases curve is heading in the wrong direction as efficient testing ramps up are not easy for the politicians.

It will only take a few more weeks for this to be resolved one way or the other, because deaths will have either risen exponentially then peaked in an April to June sort of way or not by that point. The local lockdown measures that are being imposed appear to be about being seen to do something without really reversing most of what has already been opened up again.

If the powers that be thought we were in for a huge problem the new restrictions would be much more stringent. We are unlucky that in a Scottish context that the reopening hadn't included lower level football crowds yet unlike in England, but hang in there a few more weeks and good things should start happening by the looks of things.

Where is the scientific information that it is over in Western Europe? Cases are escalating in many countries look at France 15k plus per day. Today the chief scientific adviser warned of a potential 50k cases per day in the UK with 200 plus deaths daily a month down the line. ( Thats 0.4% mortalty). Where is the evidence you talk about of this immunity I would be interested to read it as the biggest study shows 7% with antibodies a long way off herd immunity.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...