Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just now, Burnieman said:

This suggests Chisholm was in some form of contact with Petrie  "Mr Chisholm claimed SFA chief executive Rod Petrie would be less inclined to accept a nomination based on anything other than final league standings."

So on a different subject matter, Petrie didn't object to Conferences at tier 6 and then changed his mind which caught the LL off guard and saw a lot of sh*t chucked in their direction.

Join the dots.

Not hard is it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Talbot supporter said:

If the SFA didn't want a participant from our league to compete in next season then fair doos

That sounds fair enough

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, Bawrash1 said:

Haha you couldn’t make it up. Destroy the minutes. Just goes to show what a joke of an association the sjfa are.

It’s not the sjfa it’s the west region 2 different sets of folks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, southerner said:


So if the season was null and void, that would have meant Darvel would have been in the conference next season. Do they not benefit from being made joint champions on a ppg basis?

Have to say that's a great deflection attempt there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I remember at the time the decision was announced it was said they declared champions so that there would be a qualifier to the Scottish Cup. When it was called out that Auchinleck Talbot had a member on the committee, it was pointed out they were not involved in the decision.

Turns out they missed an important couple of steps in their decision making process.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I remember at the time the decision was announced it was said they declared champions so that there would be a qualifier to the Scottish Cup. When it was called out that Auchinleck Talbot had a member on the committee, it was pointed out they were not involved in the decision.
Turns out they missed an important couple of steps in their decision making process.

Where are all the talbot fans they usually take over but they know it’s wrong so no comments

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, FairWeatherFan said:

I remember at the time the decision was announced it was said they declared champions so that there would be a qualifier to the Scottish Cup. When it was called out that Auchinleck Talbot had a member on the committee, it was pointed out they were not involved in the decision.

Turns out they missed an important couple of steps in their decision making process.

More like they added a couple.

Like (1) cancel the decision to declare null & void because the Talbot rep & acting president doesn't like it and (2) change it to give him the decision that benefits his club

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesn't look too bad , look at the first article that folk are complaining about it getting scrapped - they still had to decide a participant in the cup even if the league was null & void.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That 3rd email instructing destruction of the minutes was sent by the Interim General Secretary of the SJFA, not the West Region. Strange.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Talbot supporter said:

Doesn't look too bad , look at the first article that folk are complaining about it getting scrapped - they still had to decide a participant in the cup even if the league was null & void.

I admire your stoicism, but this is not a position which can be defended.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If league is null and void just say no one gets Scottish place if it didn’t happen they can’t nominate someone so who gets the Scottish junior cup place then beith or pollok as they are only 2 teams in the semis

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If league is null and void just say no one gets Scottish place if it didn’t happen they can’t nominate someone so who gets the Scottish junior cup place then beith or pollok as they are only 2 teams in the semis
Its says it would have been the best performing in the league that would get the Scottish cup place

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Talbot supporter said:

Doesn't look too bad , look at the first article that folk are complaining about it getting scrapped - they still had to decide a participant in the cup even if the league was null & void.

The Scottish Cup rules say the winners of each Junior Championship are eligible, not that a club must be put forward.

Obviously the honourable thing to do would be for the SJFA to write to the SFA and say that they have no eligible clubs to take part in the Scottish Cup.

2 minutes ago, archieb said:

That 3rd email instructing destruction of the minutes was sent by the Interim General Secretary of the SJFA, not the West Region. Strange.

I'm guessing the from line has been truncated and the full title is "Interim General Secretary of the SJFA West Region" ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm guessing the from line has been truncated and the full title is "Interim General Secretary of the SJFA West Region"

 

There should be no places as the junior leagues no longer exist then it be easy just to say leagues weren’t finished so we won’t be taking up the place

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
There should be no places as the junior leagues no longer exist then it be easy just to say leagues weren’t finished so we won’t be taking up the place
That's the SFA that's wanted a participant then

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That's the SFA that's wanted a participant then

We didn’t have a winner it was being declared null and void until the talbot member in the committee intervened the west committee should have just said we don’t have a winner so we don’t have a particepent the same as the east

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We didn’t have a winner it was being declared null and void until the talbot member in the committee intervened the west committee should have just said we don’t have a winner so we don’t have a particepent the same as the east
It was getting declared null and void yes but even with that the SFA still wanted a participant in the cup and they were still going to use best performing in the league

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It was getting declared null and void yes but even with that the SFA still wanted a participant in the cup and they were still going to use best performing in the league
If that's the case why didn't the SFA ask the East Region for the same ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...