BANKIEBILL Posted May 17, 2020 Share Posted May 17, 2020 Just now, Burnieman said: This suggests Chisholm was in some form of contact with Petrie "Mr Chisholm claimed SFA chief executive Rod Petrie would be less inclined to accept a nomination based on anything other than final league standings." So on a different subject matter, Petrie didn't object to Conferences at tier 6 and then changed his mind which caught the LL off guard and saw a lot of sh*t chucked in their direction. Join the dots. Not hard is it 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BANKIEBILL Posted May 17, 2020 Share Posted May 17, 2020 8 minutes ago, Talbot supporter said: If the SFA didn't want a participant from our league to compete in next season then fair doos That sounds fair enough 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitburn exile Posted May 17, 2020 Share Posted May 17, 2020 36 minutes ago, Bawrash1 said: Haha you couldn’t make it up. Destroy the minutes. Just goes to show what a joke of an association the sjfa are. It’s not the sjfa it’s the west region 2 different sets of folks 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FairWeatherFan Posted May 17, 2020 Share Posted May 17, 2020 I remember at the time the decision was announced it was said they declared champions so that there would be a qualifier to the Scottish Cup. When it was called out that Auchinleck Talbot had a member on the committee, it was pointed out they were not involved in the decision. Turns out they missed an important couple of steps in their decision making process. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
classof2010 Posted May 17, 2020 Share Posted May 17, 2020 I remember at the time the decision was announced it was said they declared champions so that there would be a qualifier to the Scottish Cup. When it was called out that Auchinleck Talbot had a member on the committee, it was pointed out they were not involved in the decision. Turns out they missed an important couple of steps in their decision making process.Where are all the talbot fans they usually take over but they know it’s wrong so no comments 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
archieb Posted May 17, 2020 Share Posted May 17, 2020 7 minutes ago, FairWeatherFan said: I remember at the time the decision was announced it was said they declared champions so that there would be a qualifier to the Scottish Cup. When it was called out that Auchinleck Talbot had a member on the committee, it was pointed out they were not involved in the decision. Turns out they missed an important couple of steps in their decision making process. More like they added a couple. Like (1) cancel the decision to declare null & void because the Talbot rep & acting president doesn't like it and (2) change it to give him the decision that benefits his club 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killiesquirrel Posted May 17, 2020 Author Share Posted May 17, 2020 Update https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/ayrshire/revealed-null-void-paper-trail-22042903 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Talbot supporter Posted May 17, 2020 Share Posted May 17, 2020 Doesn't look too bad , look at the first article that folk are complaining about it getting scrapped - they still had to decide a participant in the cup even if the league was null & void. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
archieb Posted May 17, 2020 Share Posted May 17, 2020 That 3rd email instructing destruction of the minutes was sent by the Interim General Secretary of the SJFA, not the West Region. Strange. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Informer Posted May 17, 2020 Share Posted May 17, 2020 4 minutes ago, Talbot supporter said: Doesn't look too bad , look at the first article that folk are complaining about it getting scrapped - they still had to decide a participant in the cup even if the league was null & void. I admire your stoicism, but this is not a position which can be defended. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
classof2010 Posted May 17, 2020 Share Posted May 17, 2020 If league is null and void just say no one gets Scottish place if it didn’t happen they can’t nominate someone so who gets the Scottish junior cup place then beith or pollok as they are only 2 teams in the semis 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Talbot supporter Posted May 17, 2020 Share Posted May 17, 2020 If league is null and void just say no one gets Scottish place if it didn’t happen they can’t nominate someone so who gets the Scottish junior cup place then beith or pollok as they are only 2 teams in the semis Its says it would have been the best performing in the league that would get the Scottish cup place 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginaro Posted May 17, 2020 Share Posted May 17, 2020 2 minutes ago, Talbot supporter said: Doesn't look too bad , look at the first article that folk are complaining about it getting scrapped - they still had to decide a participant in the cup even if the league was null & void. The Scottish Cup rules say the winners of each Junior Championship are eligible, not that a club must be put forward. Obviously the honourable thing to do would be for the SJFA to write to the SFA and say that they have no eligible clubs to take part in the Scottish Cup. 2 minutes ago, archieb said: That 3rd email instructing destruction of the minutes was sent by the Interim General Secretary of the SJFA, not the West Region. Strange. I'm guessing the from line has been truncated and the full title is "Interim General Secretary of the SJFA West Region" 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
classof2010 Posted May 17, 2020 Share Posted May 17, 2020 I'm guessing the from line has been truncated and the full title is "Interim General Secretary of the SJFA West Region" [emoji6] There should be no places as the junior leagues no longer exist then it be easy just to say leagues weren’t finished so we won’t be taking up the place 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Talbot supporter Posted May 17, 2020 Share Posted May 17, 2020 There should be no places as the junior leagues no longer exist then it be easy just to say leagues weren’t finished so we won’t be taking up the placeThat's the SFA that's wanted a participant then 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ilford Drummer Posted May 17, 2020 Share Posted May 17, 2020 Stand up East Regions Juniors. the only place outside the corrupt web led by the Fat Jap. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
classof2010 Posted May 17, 2020 Share Posted May 17, 2020 That's the SFA that's wanted a participant thenWe didn’t have a winner it was being declared null and void until the talbot member in the committee intervened the west committee should have just said we don’t have a winner so we don’t have a particepent the same as the east 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Talbot supporter Posted May 17, 2020 Share Posted May 17, 2020 We didn’t have a winner it was being declared null and void until the talbot member in the committee intervened the west committee should have just said we don’t have a winner so we don’t have a particepent the same as the east It was getting declared null and void yes but even with that the SFA still wanted a participant in the cup and they were still going to use best performing in the league 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glensmad Posted May 17, 2020 Share Posted May 17, 2020 It was getting declared null and void yes but even with that the SFA still wanted a participant in the cup and they were still going to use best performing in the league If that's the case why didn't the SFA ask the East Region for the same ? 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
classof2010 Posted May 17, 2020 Share Posted May 17, 2020 It was getting declared null and void yes but even with that the SFA still wanted a participant in the cup and they were still going to use best performing in the league Why didn’t they ask the east for a participant as well 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.