Dons_1988 Posted May 14, 2020 Share Posted May 14, 2020 12 hours ago, bennett said: That would be a dangerous precedent to set, an all powerful spfl unanswerable to anyone. Though the sevrumour is that shifty and the lads are preparing a case against Sevco right now, you may get your wish. I agree with you here. Ultimately the board just act on behalf of the clubs so the clubs should always have means to air their grievances, as unpleasant as Rangers were about the whole thing. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparticus Posted May 14, 2020 Share Posted May 14, 2020 5 minutes ago, arabdelic said: Voting for Rangers motions, doctoring minutes. What has happened to the sheep? I'm saying nothing.wouldnt want to lose the red pound. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomGuy. Posted May 14, 2020 Share Posted May 14, 2020 Folk speaking as if Aberdeen dont have a history of slithering around in the OF shadow. Their pathetic vote to maintain the 11-1 structure was the moment their spine left the building. 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dons_1988 Posted May 14, 2020 Share Posted May 14, 2020 2 minutes ago, RandomGuy. said: Folk speaking as if Aberdeen dont have a history of slithering around in the OF shadow. Their pathetic vote to maintain the 11-1 structure was the moment their spine left the building. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeo Posted May 14, 2020 Share Posted May 14, 2020 (edited) It'll take a long time for Aberdeen to recover from firstly siding with the **** then secondly trying to make it look like they weren't siding with the ****. For shame..... I feel a group apology from the Aberdeen fans on here might go some way to healing the division hey have created. Edited May 14, 2020 by Romeo 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sherrif John Bunnell Posted May 14, 2020 Share Posted May 14, 2020 34 minutes ago, arabdelic said: Voting for Rangers motions, doctoring minutes. What has happened to the sheep? Tories gonna Tory. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomGuy. Posted May 14, 2020 Share Posted May 14, 2020 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Dons_1988 said: Try and deny it. It's absolutely zero shock to see Aberdeen once again aligning themselves with an OF club. Edited May 14, 2020 by RandomGuy. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludo*1 Posted May 14, 2020 Share Posted May 14, 2020 10 minutes ago, RandomGuy. said: Their pathetic vote to maintain the 11-1 structure was the moment their spine left the building. That moment really is an underappreciated moment for being the most shitebag action ever taken by a Scottish club. Essentially condemned us to OF rule for another 8 year (And realistically many more to come). 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dons_1988 Posted May 14, 2020 Share Posted May 14, 2020 2 minutes ago, RandomGuy. said: Try and deny it. It's absolutely zero shock to see Aberdeen once again aligning themselves with an OF club. I'm not denying it. It was a shameful vote and I've said it many times on here. I am laughing at you and your bombastic statements about us. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Day Posted May 14, 2020 Share Posted May 14, 2020 6 hours ago, RossBFaeDundee said: Thought this was going to be something more interesting than "man takes minutes incorrectly then corrects them" Good to see Keith (Lying b*****d about Hibs fans in the 2016 cup final) Jackshun is still a terrible writer - this line in particular; "..........the £7.5million of prize money still under lock and key on Hampden’s sixth floor......" Yes Keith, its delivered in Aldi bags full of cash 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Day Posted May 14, 2020 Share Posted May 14, 2020 However, in better news - looks like Hearts get officially relegated next week. Must pop out for a bottle of fizz. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dons_1988 Posted May 14, 2020 Share Posted May 14, 2020 1 minute ago, Green Day said: Thought this was going to be something more interesting than "man takes minutes incorrectly then corrects them" Good to see Keith (Lying b*****d about Hibs fans in the 2016 cup final) Jackshun is still a terrible writer - this line in particular; "..........the £7.5million of prize money still under lock and key on Hampden’s sixth floor......" Yes Keith, its delivered in Aldi bags full of cash Don't let the actual story get in the way of the 'Aberhun' chat mate, come on. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kent_don Posted May 14, 2020 Share Posted May 14, 2020 15 minutes ago, RandomGuy. said: Try and deny it. It's absolutely zero shock to see Aberdeen once again aligning themselves with an OF club. Are you ok? Lockdown getting too much for you? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arabdelic Posted May 14, 2020 Share Posted May 14, 2020 3 minutes ago, Dons_1988 said: Don't let the actual story get in the way of the 'Aberhun' chat mate, come on. In the powder keg of agenda being pushed,mistrust, claims. counter claims it is important if something is unanimous it is stated as 'unanimous' rather than the slightly more vague 'consensus' which has a different meaning. Its diluting. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dons_1988 Posted May 14, 2020 Share Posted May 14, 2020 2 minutes ago, arabdelic said: In the powder keg of agenda being pushed,mistrust, claims. counter claims it is important if something is unanimous it is stated as 'unanimous' rather than the slightly more vague 'consensus' which has a different meaning. Its diluting. Yeah, it needed corrected. And it has been. Keith Jackson blows another story wide open. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Day Posted May 14, 2020 Share Posted May 14, 2020 5 minutes ago, Dons_1988 said: Don't let the actual story get in the way of the 'Aberhun' chat mate, come on. We cant change history mate - so Milne made a decision that in retrospect wasnt a good one, big fuckin deal. The only people who moan about these things are usually the same sort. You know the type - sits in a work meeting muttering and giggling to their thick mate at the back and would shite their pants if asked to make an adult decision. There are still radges on Hibs.net howling about Rod Petrie for "his role" in the 5 way agreement re Sevco several years back. I keep saying it - this is the time to point and laugh at Rangers and Hearts - lets not take our eye off the ball............ 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingjoey Posted May 14, 2020 Share Posted May 14, 2020 25 minutes ago, RandomGuy. said: Try and deny it. It's absolutely zero shock to see Aberdeen once again aligning themselves with an OF club. Given that, according to the amended minutes, Aberdeen aligned themselves with both Celtic and Rangers, as did St Johnstone, not sure that your sentence is entirely correct. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mon_The_Fife Posted May 14, 2020 Share Posted May 14, 2020 Apologies, I’ve realised the whoosh now. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coprolite Posted May 14, 2020 Share Posted May 14, 2020 17 minutes ago, arabdelic said: In the powder keg of agenda being pushed,mistrust, claims. counter claims it is important if something is unanimous it is stated as 'unanimous' rather than the slightly more vague 'consensus' which has a different meaning. Its diluting. Consensus is the noun for a situation in which everyone agrees. Everyone in consensus is unanimous, an adjective. This is the most semantic bullshit story I've ever heard. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arabdelic Posted May 14, 2020 Share Posted May 14, 2020 1 minute ago, coprolite said: Consensus is the noun for a situation in which everyone agrees. Everyone in consensus is unanimous, an adjective. This is the most semantic bullshit story I've ever heard. No unanimous is full agreement. The literal definition of consensus is general agreement. The 2 are not the same. The definition of general is concerning all or most . You may want to call it semantics but use of the term consensus leaves the door ajar a bit that not everyone agreed. Under the current climate it is very important that if everyone voted for something it is stated that it was everyone as we know when the SPFL declare the Premiership the usual suspects will kick up another shit storm. It is important to state the decision was unanimous. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.