Ric Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 So turns out that it's not the complete document. The one sent out is 54 pages long. Apparently Rangers are still waiting on the 55th. 13 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bohemian Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
santheman Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 (edited) 55 pages is a lot of smoke without there being some kind of fire edit. Now up to 200 Edited May 7, 2020 by santheman 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Munoz Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 4 minutes ago, santheman said: 55 pages is a lot of smoke without there being some kind of fire edit. Now up to 200 Aye, but how big is the dossier? 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
renton Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 4 minutes ago, Bohemian said: For 200 pages... 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bohemian Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 3 minutes ago, renton said: For 200 pages... They went with a bigger front and pictures.. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EdinburghPar1975 Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 Must have some cracking pictures! In all seriousness 200+ pages is a lot of proof/ accusation of wrongdoing (if there is any)...or conversely they've just solved the toilet paper crisis from the start of the COVID impact... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ric Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 Perhaps I'm being cynical here, but I wonder if they've put in a fictitious entry unique to each document in order to identify who is responsible for the inevitable leak. In the same way map makers would add in towns, the famous one being (or not being) Agloe, in New York State. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post PrestersKTID Posted May 7, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted May 7, 2020 SPFL respond with 174 pages of Chronicles of Banter years 32 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post dezz Posted May 7, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted May 7, 2020 The first 100 pages is probably just a big list of what schools all SPFL employees went to. 20 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aim Here Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 Just now, EdinburghPar1975 said: Must have some cracking pictures! In all seriousness 200+ pages is a lot of proof/ accusation of wrongdoing (if there is any)...or conversely they've just solved the toilet paper crisis from the start of the COVID impact... It could possibly be just a well-worn strategy of throwing a ton of shit that takes far too much time to refute. It would also explain the maximal delay. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Public menace Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 Wasn’t one of rangers gripes about clubs reading a 140 page document days before the original vote, even though I was only a 15 page document.Why fire out a 220 page dossier days before the EGM?? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludo*1 Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 It must be some read if the media have know that the clubs have had it for over an hour and there's not been a leak yet. Scot Gardiner for the first time in his life staying silent? Oh, yeah, he supports Rangers. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zen Archer (Raconteur) Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 Just now, dezz said: The first 100 pages is probably just a big list of what schools all SPFL employees went to. 100 pages is the length of Oldco's debtors list which is appropriate. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ross. Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 5 minutes ago, EdinburghPar1975 said: Must have some cracking pictures! In all seriousness 200+ pages is a lot of proof/ accusation of wrongdoing (if there is any)...or conversely they've just solved the toilet paper crisis from the start of the COVID impact... I think you are confusing the term “proof” with the terms “evidence” and “accusations”. Releasing 200 pages as close to the meeting as they have suggests they don’t want to give time for it to be fully digested and dissected and for chairmen to have a chance to discuss it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 Just now, Ross. said: I think you are confusing the term “proof” with the terms “evidence” and “accusations”. Releasing 200 pages as close to the meeting as they have suggests they don’t want to give time for it to be fully digested and dissected and for chairmen to have a chance to discuss it. Just get it out there and we'll do the work for them. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sherrif John Bunnell Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 Sending a 200 page PDF attachment to anyone is real shithousery. Those things take hours to download. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludo*1 Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bohemian Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 This is heating up nicely... more leaks please... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.