The DA Posted July 14, 2020 Share Posted July 14, 2020 1 minute ago, paranoid android said: I'm confused - the SFA have submitted a notice of complaint against the Hertz and The Jags - ok. Are the SFA no' involved in this arbitration process? ETA: IT'S NO' FAIR, LIKESAY! Two different issues and the SFA can be unbiased on both. They're only providing two of the arbitrators - they won't be making any judgements. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
die hard doonhamer Posted July 14, 2020 Share Posted July 14, 2020 2 minutes ago, paranoid android said: I'm confused - the SFA have submitted a notice of complaint against the Hertz and The Jags - ok. Are the SFA no' involved in this arbitration process? ETA: IT'S NO' FAIR, LIKESAY! It's an SFA arbitration process, but the SFA aren't really involved, it's an independent panel. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludo*1 Posted July 14, 2020 Share Posted July 14, 2020 Boy on Kickback posting, 'I feel like burning Hampden down'. Others demanding an interdict whilst some bizarrely claiming 'They're rattled, intae thum!' It's all getting a bit Rangers Media. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomGuy. Posted July 14, 2020 Share Posted July 14, 2020 Surprised to hear that breaking a law you agreed to opens you up for a punishment you agreed to if you broke that law. Incredible. 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyingscot Posted July 14, 2020 Share Posted July 14, 2020 Stranraer must be delighted to have stayed out of all this! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rainbowrising Posted July 14, 2020 Share Posted July 14, 2020 4 minutes ago, Ludo*1 said: Lachlan Cameron indirectly called out Scot Gardiner as a liar today as well. Gardiner said there was a 100+ page document which they had to vote on. Lachlan saying it was only 14 or so pages and didn't know where this came from. Is SG referring to the notorious Sevco dossier? The dossier goes on and on but a far shorter summary is also available I think. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paranoid android Posted July 14, 2020 Share Posted July 14, 2020 2 minutes ago, The DA said: Two different issues and the SFA can be unbiased on both. They're only providing two of the arbitrators - they won't be making any judgements. Can. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blootoon87 Posted July 14, 2020 Share Posted July 14, 2020 What a fucking laugh this is. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludo*1 Posted July 14, 2020 Share Posted July 14, 2020 1 minute ago, rainbowrising said: Is SG referring to the notorious Sevco dossier? The dossier goes on and on but a far shorter summary is also available I think. No, he was on about the original vote that clubs 'didn't have time to read'. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC92 Posted July 14, 2020 Share Posted July 14, 2020 Just now, RandomGuy. said: Surprised to hear that breaking a law you agreed to opens you up for a punishment you agreed to if you broke that law. Incredible. They haven't broken a law, it's an SFA rule, a rule which a judge happened to say is potentially unlawful last week. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted July 14, 2020 Share Posted July 14, 2020 36 minutes ago, 8GamesToGo said: All goes back to that Dundee vote. If Hearts and PT let that fly, does that not give the SPFL and co free reign to do whatever the f**k they want? Now it's intimidation during the arbitration process. All completely competent though lads! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Szamo's_Ammo Posted July 14, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted July 14, 2020 Super Hearts incredulous Their statements are atrocious Stealing words from Sevco rants To cry about their Notice 25 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. X Posted July 14, 2020 Share Posted July 14, 2020 2 minutes ago, RandomGuy. said: Surprised to hear that breaking a law you agreed to opens you up for a punishment you agreed to if you broke that law. Incredible. It's not the attempt at arse kicking that's the problem, it's the timing of the attempt at arse kicking. You knew that but it didn't suit your diddy wee chance to have a sly dig. -3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted July 14, 2020 Share Posted July 14, 2020 1 minute ago, DC92 said: They haven't broken a law, it's an SFA rule, a rule which a judge happened to say is potentially unlawful last week. I think he meant the maximum sanction could be out of proportion to the offence, but he accepted the rule, otherwise he wouldn't have sent it to arbitration. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mishtergrolsch Posted July 14, 2020 Share Posted July 14, 2020 1 hour ago, welshbairn said: Naughty! https://www.scottishfa.co.uk/scottish-fa/football-governance/disciplinary/disciplinary-updates/ Punishable by death? Expulsion would do though. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 8GamesToGo Posted July 14, 2020 Share Posted July 14, 2020 3 minutes ago, welshbairn said: A rule Lord Clark said may not be lawful. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorky Posted July 14, 2020 Share Posted July 14, 2020 It was always going to end badly I’m afraid, I think that’s probably now even sinking in with Hearts supporters. As before no real winners in this. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 8GamesToGo Posted July 14, 2020 Share Posted July 14, 2020 Just now, welshbairn said: I think he meant the maximum sanction could be out of proportion to the offence, but he accepted the rule, otherwise he wouldn't have sent it to arbitration. He also said (in not so many words) "No funny business or it's back to court." This seems to count as funny business. The timing of it is er interesting. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sherrif John Bunnell Posted July 14, 2020 Share Posted July 14, 2020 (edited) It's medicine time Edited July 14, 2020 by Sherrif John Bunnell 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. X Posted July 14, 2020 Share Posted July 14, 2020 Just now, Yorky said: It was always going to end badly I’m afraid, I think that’s probably now even sinking in with Hearts supporters. As before no real winners in this. Has it ended? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.