Jump to content

League Reconstruction 20/21 season


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, bennett said:

Apart  from several resolutions, an excellent reconstruction plan which should have suited all teams and our dossier which has been proved right.

 

But Ross Mcarthur apparently told us enough was enough. 

 

Has it been proved right? According to it there was a £10million  liability to BT/SKY etc, but that appears to be settled for £2.3million. Combined tv deal was worth £17.5 milion per year for 30 games so £10 million seems a bit steep, even if we factor in foreign broadcaster's and BBC. It does however match, however, amazingly the figure due By SPFL if the legal action is succesful,. How did they know that or was that due to the ICT/Hearts/Rangers plan that umpteen Championship clubs have confirmed was being worked on.

The reconstruction.plan was not excellent nor did it suit all teams or it would have been voted through.

Edited by Tannadeechee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Tannadeechee said:

Has it been proved right? According to it there was a £10million  liability to BT/SKY etc, but that appears to be settled for £2.3million. combined tv deal was worth £17.5 milion per year so for 30 games so £10 million seems a bit steep. It does however match, however, amazingly the figure due By SPFL if the legal action is succesful,. How did they know that or was that due to the ICT/Hearts/Rangers plan that umpteen Championship clubs have confirmed was being worked on.

The reconstruction.plan was not excellent nor did it suit all teams or it would have been voted through.

£1.5m to sky, plus spfl sponsorship 'free' to sky.

£2.5m to BT sport. 

Still undisclosed sums to the bbc and foreign broadcasters to be paid.

 

When you add it all up the 'up to' £10m isn't that far off, especially with the sponsorship sweetener.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LIVIFOREVER said:

Only they didn't go after everyone, they kept well away from challenging Celtic on keeping their title, kinda having their cake and eating with keeping the award of Champions but no promotions. Should be either one or the other.

 

Not wishing to stick up for Hearts but is it not the case that they are happy for teams at the top to be named champions, but they don’t think said champions should be promoted?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ribzanelli said:

Not wishing to stick up for Hearts but is it not the case that they are happy for teams at the top to be named champions, but they don’t think said champions should be promoted?

The want to reward sides with titles, european qualification and prize money, based on their position, but dont want to reward sides with promotion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ribzanelli said:

Not wishing to stick up for Hearts but is it not the case that they are happy for teams at the top to be named champions, but they don’t think said champions should be promoted?

Yes, they are happy to call the winners.of the leagues Champions, happy for prize money to be handed out based on finishing position & European places based on finishing position, but no promotion or relegation.

If they had stopped Champions being declared, they would have made an "enemy" of Celtic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, bennett said:

£1.5m to sky, plus spfl sponsorship 'free' to sky.

£2.5m to BT sport. 

Still undisclosed sums to the bbc and foreign broadcasters to be paid.

 

When you add it all up the 'up to' £10m isn't that far off, especially with the sponsorship sweetener.

 

 

Sorry , my mistake, £2.3 million to BT (which may have been less if ND hadn't slagged them publicly, which wasn't a good look) and £1.5 million to Sky. Forgot about that last amount.

Foreign is £2 million a year so at worst would be £500000 (ie a quarter, 8 games not played).

BBC deal is £2.8million a season, most would be £700000.

Total would be maximum £5million. How much would we have had to pay in penalties to Sky if new contract couldn't start, or was delayed or shortened due to lengthened 209-20 season?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, bennett said:

£1.5m to sky, plus spfl sponsorship 'free' to sky.

Where?

Show me a single link showing the SPFL have agreed to a sponsorship with anyone.

Much less Sky, much less 'free'.

I noticed another Rangers fan spouting about this on Twitter a few days ago and asked then to helpfully provide the link showing 'free' sponsorship and funnily enough there was no response.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, MariusZaliukas said:

Hearts (and most of the hearts posters on here) deserve plenty of pelters, but that “successful businesswoman Anne budge” and “Heart of Seetothian” in every post is absolutely awful yer da patter.
 

It's no' fair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hearts (and most of the hearts posters on here) deserve plenty of pelters, but that “successful businesswoman Anne budge” and “Heart of Seetothian” in every post is absolutely awful yer da patter.


"seethlothian"
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, MariusZaliukas said:

Hearts (and most of the hearts posters on here) deserve plenty of pelters, but that “successful businesswoman Anne budge” and “Heart of Seetothian” in every post is absolutely awful yer da patter.
 

dance dancing GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, MariusZaliukas said:

Hearts (and most of the hearts posters on here) deserve plenty of pelters, but that “successful businesswoman Anne budge” and “Heart of Seetothian” in every post is absolutely awful yer da patter.
 

Aye, because St Liedown for the last 30 odd years didn't make you lot sound like a bunch of crying children? :rolleyes:

At least Heart of Seethelothian has a basis of fact, while successful businesswoman Ann Budge is what Tom English's called her. I heard Tommy boy is your biggest fan these days, so I can't see why you would be annoyed by that.

Of course, if you find the patter rank, there is a solution for that. Go post in the forum designated for your team. I'll give you a hint, it's not this one. ;)

Edited by Ric
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...