Jump to content

League Reconstruction 20/21 season


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, HooseLee said:

There's not a fan of other clubs on here wouldn't have expected their club to have taken the same action if it had happened to them.   There were other options available to the league and none if you can say that this was the fairest.  Does every poster here who is celebrating think that the spfl have handled this well?  

I quite like this line of arguments tbh, there’s quite a few that are amusing but the ‘anyone would do this’ is certainly up there. Stranraer didn’t and Partick only jumped in on a no win no fee injuries4u attempt.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL.

I just had my first visit to kickback.

Understandably deluded, almost all of them 'convinced' they won in court today. The 2:1 rulings in their favour mean they won. Any posts to the contrary are getting pelters.

One poster (Last Laff) points out the stupidity of claiming a victory when Hearts / Partick have actually been ordered to pay costs to the SPFL.

That opinion is challenged by one brain donor because they only have to pay 50% of the costs.

So, still a victory for Hearts then.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, HooseLee said:

There's not a fan of other clubs on here wouldn't have expected their club to have taken the same action if it had happened to them.   There were other options available to the league and none if you can say that this was the fairest.  Does every poster here who is celebrating think that the spfl have handled this well?  

Just shut the f**k up.

The entire point of this thread is to give Hearts a good pitchforking so reasonable questions like yours have no place here.

Now excuse me.  I hear there's a witch-burning about to begin 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, shawfield shed boy said:

So hearts are getting compo which they could have got pre court costs...

Now meaning after their bill they.ll end up with Zilch or less.

Am i getting this correct.?!

No. They might get compensation of some sort, but they might get nothing.

That's what the next step in the process (arbitration) will determine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, shawfield shed boy said:

So hearts are getting compo which they could have got pre court costs...

Now meaning after their bill they.ll end up with Zilch or less.

Am i getting this correct.?!

 

They wanted some daft civil court to set the compo now they get the crumbs from Petrie's table.  SFA indeed!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, shawfield shed boy said:

So hearts are getting compo which they could have got pre court costs...
Now meaning after their bill they.ll end up with Zilch or less.
Am i getting this correct.?!

A strategy befitting of Successful Business Woman Ann Budge. (c. Tom "It's No' Fair" English) .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Aim Here said:

The dismissal motion was along the lines of 'The case belongs to the SFA arbitrators, therefore it should be dismissed in the Court of Session'. Outright dismissal in that way doesn't seem contradictory to me.

Hearts wanted full courts case. 

SPFL's stance was it should go to Arbitration. 

United's was that it should be dismissed outright.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...