Jump to content

The SPFL recommendation?


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, haufdaft said:

My point was that the SPFL justification for rejecting null and void was the resultant financial liability

Turns out the liability still exists.

And they've still not settled with BT sports yet

There was still a liability - the argument was that there could be a liability for the entire season if it was null and void, rather than the handful of matches under this scenario. I'm not convinced how true that was, but this doesn't contradict that argument in any way.

The SPFL statement through the week said that all liabilities from 2019/20 had now been settled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what the proposal is.
U 21 to start with. That would change within a couple of years to be just a B Team, absolutely certain of that. At which point they would progress to the top of the championship and hang around there like a bad smell.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DA Baracus said:

Mental that folk immediately and unquestionably accept something just because it was said online.

And of course the SPFL have already released a statement saying it's a lie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The financial element of this is a worry, will some clubs cave and take the £££s given the current climate. Seems the old firm are trying to benefit from this which is pretty underhand.

£125,000 each to join which goes straight to the other third tier clubs. That’s about £15,000 per club. Plus the promise to buy 200 x £15 tickets for every away game. That’s another £6000 based on each arse cheek visiting you once.

Hope clubs stand up to this and it gets shot down. Even if it didn’t directly impact on Clyde there is still no way we should give this the time of day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Clyde01 said:

£125,000 each to join which goes straight to the other third tier clubs. That’s about £15,000 per club. Plus the promise to buy 200 x £15 tickets for every away game. That’s another £6000 based on each arse cheek visiting you once.

Financially it makes little sense.

The Challenge Cup showed that crowds drop so significantly that 200 tickets wont see you making any money.

Add in the fans you force away from the other home games that season, and any profit through the Colt venture, even in season one, would be negligible. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, bullyweehutch said:

They can pay for 200 tickets if they want but home fans wont turn up.

I haven't been to a single Challenge cup match since they were introduced even if we arent drawn against a colt team.

100% this👏
Me too and never will!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The story you've included in the tweet suggests there weren't any great financial implications, since Sky were instead compensated with extra televised games.


Sky must be loving this crisis. Continuing to rake in the money for subscriptions while demanding compensation for games not played!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, bullyweehutch said:

And will clubs be happy when they get the bill for damage cause to their own stadiums when the brainless c***s that support the bigot brothers turn up

Barely any will turn up, so it will be easier to identify who they are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, EdinburghBlue said:

 


Sky must be loving this crisis. Continuing to rake in the money for subscriptions while demanding compensation for games not played!

 

Not to mention the idea that next season they could have even more than 4 old firm games a season if this colts pish got off the ground.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have I understood this correctly? You're being promised large sums of money from a club that has made substantial losses every year since its foundation in 2012 and is, by all reports, teetering on the brink of insolvency. What could possibly go wrong?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Stag Nation said:

Have I understood this correctly? You're being promised large sums of money from a club that has made substantial losses every year since its foundation in 2012 and is, by all reports, teetering on the brink of insolvency. What could possibly go wrong?

You’ve stumbled on the solution...have Rangers go tits up again, Celtic buys the assets and relaunches Rangers Mk III In League Two as a Celtic Colts team. All the Rangers fans have to find new teams to support, the OF is dissolved and the 4 OF game TV contract shite is out the window, and we can all join the ex-Rangers fans in boycotting the Colts games. While spreading the Rangers fans around would be potentially useful and lucrative, do we really want the c**ts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You’ve stumbled on the solution...have Rangers go tits up again, Celtic buys the assets and relaunches Rangers Mk III In League Two as a Celtic Colts team. All the Rangers fans have to find new teams to support, the OF is dissolved and the 4 OF game TV contract shite is out the window, and we can all join the ex-Rangers fans in boycotting the Colts games. While spreading the Rangers fans around would be potentially useful and lucrative, do we really want the c**ts?

Surely a Rangers MkIII would start out in the West of Scotland league.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...