kev23 Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 League Reconstruction My proposal is this: Tier 1: 14 teams, and a split involving the top six and bottom eight clubs. Sides will play each other home and away before and after the split. The sides in the top six will play fewer games, but they will be more likely to progress in the cups, be playing in Europe and will usually be playing the bigger clubs (Old Firm, Edinburgh clubs and Aberdeen). Tier 2: 14 teams, and a 6/8 split, too. Same formay as Tier 1. The top two getting automatic promotion and the other four involved in play-offs will compensate for playing fewer games than the bottom eight. Tier 3: Would be regionalised - less travel, more local derbies. Again, I would include 14 clubs in each with the same format as above. At the end of the season the top side from each league would be promoted and the sides finishing third, fourth and fifth in each league will play a knock out tournament, with the winner being promoted also. Any thoughts, modifications, criticism welcome. No one cares about what some dosser on a football forum has drawn up in 5 minutes. Modify that. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sinner-to-Saint Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 1 minute ago, kev23 said: No one cares about what some dosser on a football forum has drawn up in 5 minutes. Modify that. How did you know I'm a dosser? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gordon EF Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 5 minutes ago, The Reverend said: League Reconstruction My proposal is this: Tier 1: 14 teams, and a split involving the top six and bottom eight clubs. Sides will play each other home and away before and after the split. The sides in the top six will play fewer games, but they will be more likely to progress in the cups, be playing in Europe and will usually be playing the bigger clubs (Old Firm, Edinburgh clubs and Aberdeen). Tier 2: 14 teams, and a 6/8 split, too. Same formay as Tier 1. The top two getting automatic promotion and the other four involved in play-offs will compensate for playing fewer games than the bottom eight. Tier 3: Would be regionalised - less travel, more local derbies. Again, I would include 14 clubs in each with the same format as above. At the end of the season the top side from each league would be promoted and the sides finishing third, fourth and fifth in each league will play a knock out tournament, with the winner being promoted also. Any thoughts, modifications, criticism welcome. I like it. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rovers_Lad Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 47 minutes ago, foreverarover said: Forfar chairman on Radio Scotland . Someone who is actually seeing sense in this situation. He gave a very good and honest interview Was actually shocked to hear him say that the payment they would receive on any pay out would only be £3700 so on that basis a fair chunk of prize money must have already been paid out so their vote had nothing to do with money.The club needed clarity so they could start planning knowing the league they,ll play in,players,contracts etc and cant remember his exact words but was quite open how they,d benefit if Partick were relegated and still having Falkirk in the league 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CALDERON Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 12 minutes ago, Gordon EF said: What's to stop them changing that through a vote? The ability to facilitate a simple vote, probably. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JulioBairn Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 1 hour ago, inreganhendrywetrust said: Did Clyde not beat you boys twice this season ? Not sure why that is relevant. Beating us doesn’t win you the league pal. Would Clyde be more or less likely to win a league that didn’t include us, Raith, Thistle, Airdrie... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paco Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 Why are people swallowing this line that the SPFL have deliberately lost Dundee’s vote? Evidently Eric Drysdale has told Championship chairmen Dundee have submitted a No vote. The SPFL dispute this. If you’re Dundee, and you want to vote no, surely you just send it again and save all this hassle? Release a simple statement saying we’ve been told the SPFL haven’t received our vote so we’ve sent it again. For the avoidance of doubt, we’ve voted no. But they aren’t doing that. They’re quite clearly angling for something. Everything else is just a sideshow drama. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Wilson Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 8 minutes ago, The Reverend said: League Reconstruction My proposal is this: Tier 1: 14 teams, and a split involving the top six and bottom eight clubs. Sides will play each other home and away before and after the split. The sides in the top six will play fewer games, but they will be more likely to progress in the cups, be playing in Europe and will usually be playing the bigger clubs (Old Firm, Edinburgh clubs and Aberdeen). Tier 2: 14 teams, and a 6/8 split, too. Same formay as Tier 1. The top two getting automatic promotion and the other four involved in play-offs will compensate for playing fewer games than the bottom eight. Tier 3: Would be regionalised - less travel, more local derbies. Again, I would include 14 clubs in each with the same format as above. At the end of the season the top side from each league would be promoted and the sides finishing third, fourth and fifth in each league will play a knock out tournament, with the winner being promoted also. Any thoughts, modifications, criticism welcome. What about the teams that finish 2nd in each of the regional divisions? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest SJP79 Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 What a bunch of crooked c***s Doncaster and his cronies are ! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sinner-to-Saint Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 Just now, Sergeant Wilson said: What about the teams that finish 2nd in each of the regional divisions? Doh! I mean't sides finishing second to fourth. Well spotted. Thanks. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craigkillie Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 54 minutes ago, The Moonster said: Ah well if its more than we used to get we should just ignore the glaring difference that still exists. That wasn't the point - the point was that posters have said that the lower league clubs are relying on this money to stay afloat, and yet are also drawing up reconstruction plans that would definitely reduce that prize money substantially. 48 minutes ago, Shadwell Dog said: So dundee voted no. Handed it in and the spfl mysteriously lost it. Incredible stuff by cockwomble to try and not have a no vote. If it was as simple as this then Dundee would just come out and say so. Dundee have said absolutely nothing, which suggests they were being less than truthful to their fellow Championship sides. 12 minutes ago, Gordon EF said: What's to stop them changing that through a vote? This has been my preferred option from the start. Vote to give out prize money based on current placings (or some smoother averaged amount) and make a decision on the league outcome later. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Wilson Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 1 minute ago, The Reverend said: Doh! I mean't sides finishing second to fourth. Well spotted. Thanks. That'll be six teams playing a knockout competition. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadwell Dog Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 (edited) 11 minutes ago, Paco said: Why are people swallowing this line that the SPFL have deliberately lost Dundee’s vote? Evidently Eric Drysdale has told Championship chairmen Dundee have submitted a No vote. The SPFL dispute this. If you’re Dundee, and you want to vote no, surely you just send it again and save all this hassle? Release a simple statement saying we’ve been told the SPFL haven’t received our vote so we’ve sent it again. For the avoidance of doubt, we’ve voted no. But they aren’t doing that. They’re quite clearly angling for something. Everything else is just a sideshow drama. Maybe more down the line of dundee put there vote in which would scupper the deal. Cockwomble then says to them if you vote no the deals scuppered. Dont be hasty. Your vote doesnt have to be in for a while yet. We'll have a wee chat over the weekend and see if we can allay any fears and then you can vote monday. Ok? Will be interesting to see what the whistleblower comes up with. The ICT director saw Dundee no vote on WhatsApp and dundee telling the clubs they had voted. Something then happened to that vote. Edited April 11, 2020 by Shadwell Dog 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sinner-to-Saint Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 1 minute ago, Sergeant Wilson said: That'll be six teams playing a knockout competition. Aye, the sides finishing third could play the sides finishing fourth in the corresponding league (perhaps a one-off game with home advantage?). The winners then play the sides finishing second. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest SJP79 Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 Doncaster be finished over this fiasco, what a joke this is ! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Wilson Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 3 minutes ago, The Reverend said: Aye, the sides finishing third could play the sides finishing fourth in the corresponding league (perhaps a one-off game with home advantage?). The winners then play the sides finishing second. Why would any one from a cross division play off be granted home advantage? You'll have guessed that I think you're making this up as you go along. Wouldn't it be better to take a more measured approach? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craigkillie Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 6 minutes ago, Shadwell Dog said: The ICT director saw Dundee no vote on WhatsApp and dundee telling the clubs they had voted. Something then happened to that vote. You have three competing theories: 1) Dundee didn't send it. 2) Dundee did send it, the SPFL didn't get it, and Dundee decided for some reason not to just resend it once that was confirmed. 3) Dundee sent it, the SPFL did get it but claimed not to, and Dundee decided not to do a single thing about it. Which of these seems most and least likely to you? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadwell Dog Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 You can ell this is douglas parks first experience of cockwombles squad. Park said: "The lack of leadership and responsibility from the SPFL as a members’ organisation has shocked me.' Really? It certainly hasn't shocked anyone else that follows scottish football. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest SJP79 Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 2 minutes ago, craigkillie said: You have three competing theories: 1) Dundee didn't send it. 2) Dundee did send it, the SPFL didn't get it, and Dundee decided for some reason not to just resend it once that was confirmed. 3) Dundee sent it, the SPFL did get it but claimed not to, and Dundee decided not to do a single thing about it. Which of these seems most and least likely to you? 4) They have been dangled a carrot by Doncaster ???? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadwell Dog Posted April 11, 2020 Share Posted April 11, 2020 (edited) 4 minutes ago, craigkillie said: You have three competing theories: 1) Dundee didn't send it. 2) Dundee did send it, the SPFL didn't get it, and Dundee decided for some reason not to just resend it once that was confirmed. 3) Dundee sent it, the SPFL did get it but claimed not to, and Dundee decided not to do a single thing about it. Which of these seems most and least likely to you? To be honest I think I'll ust wait and see what the whistleblower comes up with. The only facts are that dundee were voting no and told other clubs they had sent in their vote. Something a bit dodgy happened after that and neither dundee or the spfl seemed at all keen for the vote to be submitted again straight away. We'll just need to see what comes out in the wash. Edited April 11, 2020 by Shadwell Dog 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.