LiviLion Posted March 17, 2020 Share Posted March 17, 2020 I don't think Celtic would win the title if the season played to an end. Far too many points to play for to just hand it to them. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JTS98 Posted March 17, 2020 Share Posted March 17, 2020 2 hours ago, craigkillie said: People keep offering this as an argument, but I don't see why it would be the case. The TV companies, supporters and sponsors all got what they paid for - the matches subsequently being declared null and void wouldn't affect that. I agree with this. If you paid to see a game, then at the time you got what you paid for. You saw a competitive game. Subsequent events don't change that after the fact. The missing games at the end of the season are different, but I can't see fans chasing down their clubs for the cash. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingjoey Posted March 17, 2020 Share Posted March 17, 2020 3 hours ago, Jinky67 said: You missed the point on my feelings and your opinion. And an ignoramus would have ignored you, I quite enjoy the argument if and when you decide to bring one Is this the five minute argument or the full half hour? 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dons_1988 Posted March 17, 2020 Share Posted March 17, 2020 This jinky fella seems very committed to his petulant wee boy argument here. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddiemunster Posted March 17, 2020 Share Posted March 17, 2020 9 hours ago, craigkillie said: People keep offering this as an argument, but I don't see why it would be the case. The TV companies, supporters and sponsors all got what they paid for - the matches subsequently being declared null and void wouldn't affect that. It could be argued that what they paid for were football matches in the context of a competitive league. Declaring the league null and void has a material effect on the games which were paid for. TV companies, sponsors and fans pay less for friendlies because of the lack of meaningful competition. They could potentially have some contractual comeback on the basis of the competition being declared null and void. It's all speculation of course, but simply declaring null and void may have unexpected impacts. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topcat(The most tip top) Posted March 17, 2020 Share Posted March 17, 2020 Anybody who thinks denying Neil Lennon’s Celtic a title isn’t fully justified on comedy grounds alone is probably a fan of Mrs Brown’s boys 9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dons_1988 Posted March 17, 2020 Share Posted March 17, 2020 Award Celtic the title but in the interests of fairness (since they're not actually champions) draw our Champions league nominee out of a hat. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted March 17, 2020 Share Posted March 17, 2020 20 minutes ago, eddiemunster said: It could be argued that what they paid for were football matches in the context of a competitive league. Declaring the league null and void has a material effect on the games which were paid for. TV companies, sponsors and fans pay less for friendlies because of the lack of meaningful competition. They could potentially have some contractual comeback on the basis of the competition being declared null and void. It's all speculation of course, but simply declaring null and void may have unexpected impacts. They weren't seen as friendly matches at the time though. We were entertained (mostly) and got our money's worth. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted March 17, 2020 Share Posted March 17, 2020 Just now, Dons_1988 said: Award Celtic the title but in the interests of fairness (since they're not actually champions) draw our Champions league nominee out of a hat. I'm up for that. But every team should get as many balls in the bag as they currently have points. Celtic would get 80, Rangers 70, all the way down to any teams who could still mathematically qualify for European competition. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topcat(The most tip top) Posted March 17, 2020 Share Posted March 17, 2020 Is this the five minute argument or the full half hour?Shut your festering gob you malodorous pervert. Your sort really make me puke 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingjoey Posted March 17, 2020 Share Posted March 17, 2020 53 minutes ago, topcat(The most tip top) said: Shut your festering gob you malodorous pervert. Your sort really make me puke I’ve been told Dinsdale Piranha nailed your head to the floor. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CambieBud Posted March 17, 2020 Share Posted March 17, 2020 With 9 games and 27 points to play for anything could happen, you can't just say that celtic should get the title because they'd have won it anyway. It's called a season for a reason, 38 games must be played for it to be valid. The integrity of the league must be upheld. [emoji23][emoji23][emoji23]Bennett tremendous fishing. That is the 1st laugh I’ve had today[emoji23][emoji23][emoji23] Greenie given for lol 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topcat(The most tip top) Posted March 17, 2020 Share Posted March 17, 2020 3 minutes ago, kingjoey said: I’ve been told Dinsdale Piranha nailed your head to the floor. I got better 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pansjambo Posted March 17, 2020 Share Posted March 17, 2020 12 hours ago, kingjoey said: Do you support a team that’s going to be relegated if the league ends as it is now? Ah yeah, I thought so. Who I support doesn't matter. The fact is by the leagues rules each team plays 38 games. FWIW we've been dugshit for 2 years and are where we are on merit 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingjoey Posted March 17, 2020 Share Posted March 17, 2020 5 minutes ago, pansjambo said: Who I support doesn't matter. The fact is by the leagues rules each team plays 38 games. FWIW we've been dugshit for 2 years and are where we are on merit What do you suggest happens if we can’t play football until September, or later? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ftk Posted March 17, 2020 Share Posted March 17, 2020 What do you suggest happens if we can’t play football until September, or later?You finish this season. Then reduce the games next season if needed. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zing. Posted March 17, 2020 Share Posted March 17, 2020 31 minutes ago, pansjambo said: Who I support doesn't matter. The fact is by the leagues rules each team plays 38 games. FWIW we've been dugshit for 2 years and are where we are on merit And by league rules, you boys are fucked anyway. The league can do whatever they want. Hamilton chairman also reckons they can say the league is over now because over 75% of games have been played. Not seen this rule noted anywhere though. https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/sport/football/5395025/celtic-champions-hearts-relegated-spfl-75-per-cent/ 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HibsFan Posted March 17, 2020 Share Posted March 17, 2020 Literally every Hearts poster on this thread should have to start with the disclaimer "I am a Hearts fan and in this post I will be attempting to pathetically weasel us out of a deserved relegation that a week ago we had declared to be inevitable." 19 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ftk Posted March 17, 2020 Share Posted March 17, 2020 Hope that after this meeting UEFA are having today it will become a bit clearer what is going to happen. All the European leagues need to do the same thing. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akuram Posted March 17, 2020 Share Posted March 17, 2020 That's true. Maybe partial money? There must be some teams outside the top 2 that are now guaranteed top 6 (so give them the prize money for 6th now). Are any other clubs guaranteed to finish no lower than a certain position? Is it also still the case that every team gets the minimum prize money (i.e. based on finishing 12th) early doors in the season? Although had Saints game in hand against Rangers been played and we had won ( not really a certainty ) we would have now been in sixth place. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.