BawWatchin Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 (edited) 7 minutes ago, NotThePars said: Is it because of her views on abortion, trans people, or just because you want to shag her? Hopefully her first and last message asks him how old he is. Edited February 17, 2020 by BawWatchin 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sophia Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 7 hours ago, Mastermind said: Not quite sure why he would be charged. What he did was extremely creepy but the boy was of a (barely) legal age. Is there any sign of Mr Invisible yet? He's signed of his work after a catastrophic episode. Is that not enough for you or do you want him to take some more flak? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTJohnboy Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 3 minutes ago, sophia said: He's signed of his work after a catastrophic episode. Is that not enough for you or do you want him to take some more flak? It was entirely of his own making. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sophia Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 2 minutes ago, ICTJohnboy said: It was entirely of his own making. You are spectacularly missing the point and the episode was quite clearly not of his making. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 12 minutes ago, sophia said: He's signed of his work after a catastrophic episode. Is that not enough for you or do you want him to take some more flak? He should have resigned as an MSP, not taken a sickie. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sophia Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 Just now, strichener said: He should have resigned as an MSP, not taken a sickie. Thank goodness you'll never be in the position of managing actual human beings. You have no idea about his health and wellbeing and you'd be better served not to heap ridicule upon tragedy. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doulikefish Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 Holiday to Florida is the disgraced msp/mp first port of call He should have resigned as an MSP, not taken a sickie. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTJohnboy Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 2 minutes ago, sophia said: You are spectacularly missing the point and the episode was quite clearly not of his making. Goodness! How many "catastrophic episodes" has he been involved in? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 3 minutes ago, sophia said: Thank goodness you'll never be in the position of managing actual human beings. You have no idea about his health and wellbeing and you'd be better served not to heap ridicule upon tragedy. Yes, the whole situation is ridiculous although I fail to see the tragedy here. Can you enlighten us all with what part of the story is tragic - the grooming, the getting caught, the having to resign (but not really) or the inability to handle the consequences of your behaviour? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pandarilla Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 You are spectacularly missing the point and the episode was quite clearly not of his making. Wait, what?How is this whole thing not of his own making? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 18 minutes ago, doulikefish said: Holiday to Florida is the disgraced msp/mp first port of call funded with a £12k severence? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sophia Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 1 minute ago, pandarilla said: Wait, what? How is this whole thing not of his own making? The episode in and of itself is quite clearly not of his making. He's responsible for his behaviour but in the context of general online bloodlust and the flack he's taking, do you think we should be pursuing him with such relish? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin_Nevis Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 The episode in and of itself is quite clearly not of his making. He's responsible for his behaviour but in the context of general online bloodlust and the flack he's taking, do you think we should be pursuing him with such relish?Ffs his behaviour was utterly indefensible. To try and turn this into some "Poor Derek" shite is risible and embarrassing. The SNP need to follow their processes correctly to empty him, and he should resign as an MSP. It's not complicated. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sophia Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 8 minutes ago, Day of the Lords said: 23 minutes ago, sophia said: The episode in and of itself is quite clearly not of his making. He's responsible for his behaviour but in the context of general online bloodlust and the flack he's taking, do you think we should be pursuing him with such relish? Ffs his behaviour was utterly indefensible. To try and turn this into some "Poor Derek" shite is risible and embarrassing. The SNP need to follow their processes correctly to empty him, and he should resign as an MSP. It's not complicated. Apart from the "poor Derek" quote that has appeared as if by magic and the risible and embarrassing construct, aye, that's a given. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sophia Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 4 minutes ago, Grahame said: It was very clearly an act of grooming and his political career is rightly over. A broader picture might be about the age of consent/ What constitutes a minor. Soliciting a prostitute is illegal in the UK but certainly the law will come down harder on you if the worker is under 18. Also there's quite clearly an interesting sexual dynamic going on that I didn't expect in 2020 Scotland 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pandarilla Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 The episode in and of itself is quite clearly not of his making. He's responsible for his behaviour but in the context of general online bloodlust and the flack he's taking, do you think we should be pursuing him with such relish?Why are you arguing semantics to take up a defence of this guy?High profile politician with some seriously dodgy behaviour gets caught, and is rightly sacked.Why would he not be taking flak from the public? That's a given, and he has very much brought this upon himself. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTJohnboy Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 6 minutes ago, sophia said: Also there's quite clearly an interesting sexual dynamic going on that I didn't expect in 2020 Scotland Reported for racism. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sophia Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 5 minutes ago, pandarilla said: Why are you arguing semantics to take up a defence of this guy? High profile politician with some seriously dodgy behaviour gets caught, and is rightly sacked. Why would he not be taking flak from the public? That's a given, and he has very much brought this upon himself Where have I defended him? You say flak, I say flack, let's call the whole thing off. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BawWatchin Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 52 minutes ago, strichener said: Yes, the whole situation is ridiculous although I fail to see the tragedy here. Can you enlighten us all with what part of the story is tragic - the grooming, the getting caught, the having to resign (but not really) or the inability to handle the consequences of your behaviour? You do understand the definition of grooming right? "Grooming" did not take place here between 2 adults. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotThePars Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 15 minutes ago, BawWatchin said: You do understand the definition of grooming right? "Grooming" did not take place here between 2 adults. On 13/02/2020 at 09:06, NotThePars said: If your defence of perving on wee guys is “well it’s technically legal” then I’m gonna assume the only thing stopping you being a nonce is the threat of the jail tbh (to be honest). 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.