Jump to content

Coronavirus (COVID-19)


Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, oaksoft said:

You can't tell because there are at least 4 major differences between January and now - weather, lockdown, Delta and vaccines.

It could be any one of those or none of them or a permutation of them.

One of many reasons why obsessive testing just isn't really telling us as much as we want it to.

ETA. And of course we're testing 3 times as much now. Forgot about that.

Perhaps an accurate timeline for comparison is available between wave 1 v now time of inpact of the first lockdown on hospitalisations and deaths, though even that may not be that helpful as you dont know where to start the clock on this wave... It just seems to me that there is an assumption widely held that lockdowns remain a viable and useful option. I just wonder what research has beem done in the time we have had since initiating the lockdown policy that reinforces them as the way to do it. 

 

ETA, we are seeing now some folk getting tetchy about the NHS and mooting lockdowns, because the backlog created last year is contributing to the pressure on the service. So its clear from even just thinking on it that way they come with big issies aside from the more obvious ones like furlough etc

Edited by Bairnardo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, welshbairn said:

He said they hadn't decided yet. If they want to test for new variants they could just dole out free pcr tests to random arrivals, they're only sequencing 5% at the moment anyway.

b9rreGI.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Left Back said:

Some bird from Edinburgh Uni on BBC news at the moment saying PCR tests should remain.

What is it with birds from Edinburgh Uni being such utter fucknuggets?

Guy from Birmingham Uni was also quoted on BBC saying the exact same.

It should be remembered that they're speaking from purely a scientific perspective and what's best for their own research as opposed to having to deal with real life situations such as public opinion, peoples livelihoods, the Economy etc.

So really it's no surprise, the real villains here are our media and how they try and exploit the situation to come up with a scare story or spin to make it sound as if we're all doomed.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, oaksoft said:

What we can say for sure is that vaccines have clearly worked despite @detournement trying everything in his power to misinterpret the statistics to make it look otherwise.

It's hard to conclude anything other than covid being as good as over in terms of hospitalisations and deaths. The big problem now is all the knock-on logistical consequences of obsessively testing and pinging perfectly healthy people.

The 7 day average for UK Covid deaths today is 138. This corresponds to the 20th of October last year (when Nipoleon shut the pubs). Highly vaccinated Israel saw a big spike in deaths in August so it's possible the same thing could happen here when we reach a similar time frame from the most vulnerable receiving their vaccines.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WATTOO said:

Guy from Birmingham Uni was also quoted on BBC saying the exact same.

It should be remembered that they're speaking from purely a scientific perspective and what's best for their own research as opposed to having to deal with real life situations such as public opinion, peoples livelihoods, the Economy etc.

So really it's no surprise, the real villains here are our media and how they try and exploit the situation to come up with a scare story or spin to make it sound as if we're all doomed.

I read that - the clown literally has self-interest in that new testing facility they spunked a fortune on. Another chancer.

 

3 minutes ago, welshbairn said:

I think it was that guy who just interviewed Leitch on Drivetime, who said they'd be talking about it over the next few days and it would be for the transport minister and FM to make a decision.

Let's hope you're right...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, WATTOO said:

Guy from Birmingham Uni was also quoted on BBC saying the exact same.

It should be remembered that they're speaking from purely a scientific perspective and what's best for their own research as opposed to having to deal with real life situations such as public opinion, peoples livelihoods, the Economy etc.

So really it's no surprise, the real villains here are our media and how they try and exploit the situation to come up with a scare story or spin to make it sound as if we're all doomed.

 

 

If they want to conduct scientific research it shouldn’t be at cost to an individual traveller and it should be voluntary whether you participate or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Left Back said:

If they want to conduct scientific research it shouldn’t be at cost to an individual traveller and it should be voluntary whether you participate or not.

It's also completely at odds with how we monitor influenza. These dangers think the public zips up the back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Left Back said:

If they want to conduct scientific research it shouldn’t be at cost to an individual traveller and it should be voluntary whether you participate or not.

Yup, random pcr tests at the airports with an M&S voucher for the willing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Left Back said:

If they want to conduct scientific research it shouldn’t be at cost to an individual traveller and it should be voluntary whether you participate or not.

I agree but as Elixir says above, the guy has skin in the game so no surprise at all that he wants PCR testing to continue so he can do his Genomic sequencing.

He's not interested in the financial or hassle side but merely explaining to the BBC why he thinks its important.

As I say, the real bad guys here are the BBC as it's all a setup job to annoy people and try and provide a "shock" type story to the public. 

They really are a bunch of absolute chancing charlatans !!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, WATTOO said:

I agree but as Elixir says above, the guy has skin in the game so no surprise at all that he wants PCR testing to continue so he can do his Genomic sequencing.

He's not interested in the financial or hassle side but merely explaining to the BBC why he thinks its important.

As I say, the real bad guys here are the BBC as it's all a setup job to annoy people and try and provide a "shock" type story to the public. 

They really are a bunch of absolute chancing charlatans !!!

If they thinks it’s that important they should be persuading someone that funds research   to pay for it instead of getting a free ride off the public.

It isn’t the governments or publics responsibility to set policy to appease some academic and provide him with data for some research paper.

That they even think like that is disgraceful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scotland adopting the same stance to traffic light system, but sticking with the same testing regime as at the moment. 
 
https://www.gov.scot/news/international-travel-restrictions-to-be-relaxed-and-simplified/
 
 
Fucking morons.

Glad I'm flying into Manchester and not Scotland.

I will ignore their pre-departure shite.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Abdul_Latif said:

Scotland adopting the same stance to traffic light system, but sticking with the same testing regime as at the moment. 

 

https://www.gov.scot/news/international-travel-restrictions-to-be-relaxed-and-simplified/
 

 

They're going to take a few days to decide, which is different from saying they're sticking with it.

Quote

“However, we have concerns that the UK Government’s proposals to remove the requirement for a pre-departure test for some travellers will weaken our ability to protect the public health of Scotland’s communities. While we want to maintain a four nations approach to these matters, we need to consider urgently their implications.”

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...