Jump to content

Coronavirus (COVID-19)


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, DeeTillEhDeh said:

It looks like there's been zero involvement of the devolved governments in this decision. Irrespective of your views on the use of LFTs it seems stupid to not at least go through the motions of consultation.

They’re not daft though - deliberate leaking it, get Sturgeon biting, letting this become the narrative for the Sunday politics programmes and into next week.

It might actually hasten the “grown up conversation” about living with COVID that we’ve been told to expect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, DeeTillEhDeh said:

It looks like there's been zero involvement of the devolved governments in this decision. Irrespective of your views on the use of LFTs it seems stupid to not at least go through the motions of consultation.

I think you’re right on the first part. But I also think the ‘motions of consultation’ with the devolved administrations have been well proven as a complete waste of time tbf.

WM - we want to…

DA - Eh, haud oan, dinna be too hasty the noo…

Edited by alta-pete
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, DeeTillEhDeh said:

It looks like there's been zero involvement of the devolved governments in this decision. Irrespective of your views on the use of LFTs it seems stupid to not at least go through the motions of consultation.

Sturgeon's response and that of the gormless tit running Wales are utterly predictable by now. If I were running policy I wouldn't bother waiting for their concern trolling and just mix and match a few of their token phrases. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, DeeTillEhDeh said:

It looks like there's been zero involvement of the devolved governments in this decision. Irrespective of your views on the use of LFTs it seems stupid to not at least go through the motions of consultation.

Yes, and in the time she took to take her pop, likely no consultation with her own advisors or cabinet etc.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, DeeTillEhDeh said:

It looks like there's been zero involvement of the devolved governments in this decision. Irrespective of your views on the use of LFTs it seems stupid to not at least go through the motions of consultation.

As far as I can see this decision will only apply to England. The SG are free to continue providing (and funding) these tests if that’s what they want to spend money on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sturgeon's response and that of the gormless tit running Wales are utterly predictable by now. If I were running policy I wouldn't bother waiting for their concern trolling and just mix and match a few of their token phrases. 
There is one consequence of the decision - if you remove free LFTs you really can't have a self-isolation policy in place that requires the use of daily LFTs to continue working or to escape self-isolation through LFTs on days 6/7.

Possibly a move on self-isolation as well on the cards?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, DeeTillEhDeh said:

It looks like there's been zero involvement of the devolved governments in this decision. Irrespective of your views on the use of LFTs it seems stupid to not at least go through the motions of consultation.

Ultimately, they are the ones paying for it.

As VT says, at whatever point BJ says I want to scrap this, NS and MD would say "no" so there's no point in asking them.

If the SG/WA wish to continue the theatre then it really is up to them to maintain the infrastructure and finance it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DeeTillEhDeh said:

There is one consequence of the decision - if you remove free LFTs you really can't have a self-isolation policy in place that requires the use of daily LFTs to continue working or to escape self-isolation through LFTs on days 6/7.

Possibly a move on self-isolation as well on the cards?

They are planning on binning all covid related stuff in April, so you would imagine so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DeeTillEhDeh said:

There is one consequence of the decision - if you remove free LFTs you really can't have a self-isolation policy in place that requires the use of daily LFTs to continue working or to escape self-isolation through LFTs on days 6/7.

Possibly a move on self-isolation as well on the cards?

Correct. No WM funding = get back to work ya malingering toads. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can’t wait for the day Nicola Sturgeon calls out the WHO for not caring enough, when they declare it’s all over.
I'm guessing this was tongue in cheek but I won't be the slightest bit shocked if/when it happens.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know they've said it will continue to be free for care homes and NHS staff - nothing about Education where we still have the pantomime of staff and pupils taking twice weekly LFTs.
HMPPS want us to take two and a PCR every week - including p/t officers who do, em, two shifts a week. That's sixteen hundred lft and eight hundred pcr from just one nick. Take that across the country and some lucky
Bugger is maKing a bloody fortune here.
Obviously, more tests mean more positives, so this week our nick not only had to pay overtime this weekend, but also offer an extra payment to get enough bodies in to run even a skeleton regime. If this is indicative of what's happening in the NHS and other agencies, we're on the edge of the State ceasing to function.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...