Jump to content

Coronavirus (COVID-19)


Recommended Posts

"Even if Covid is not the primary reason people are in hospital, the fact they have Covid means enhanced measures are required in hospitals."
A valid point. But one that is preparing us for the numbers in hospital because of Covid being low. And the inevitable reaction that, that will bring.
And what the fuckndoes any of that have to do with inposing social restrictions on the population.


GET THEM TO f**k YOU UTTER FANNY
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bairnardo said:

And what the fuckndoes any of that have to do with inposing social restrictions on the population.


GET THEM TO f**k YOU UTTER FANNY

We'll soon be at the stage where everyone has it anyway. So you won't need to introduce any specialist measures.

Genius imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, peasy23 said:
1 minute ago, Dons_1988 said:
This is the start of a climb down. 

Let's fucking hope so.

She basically admitted the restrictions don’t have much effect and there’s no money to go any further. 

Quite surprised she said it but it’s welcome. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isolation ends in 7 days if no fever and two negative lateral flows from day 6.

Household and close contacts - boostered people won't have to self isolate but will have to take lateral flows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TheScarf said:

Whitty showed it on one of his graphs yesterday for England.  Think it was a third of folk in hospital there with Covid weren't admitted for Covid.

And nearly all who were admitted for it haven't had any vaccines.

Don't think that's correct.  If I remember it was about 90% didn't have their boosted and about 60% were unvaccinated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i knew she would give it the 'just because they weren't admitted due to Covid, they're still in hospital with it'.  Daft logic given if Wee Davie didn't break his leg at fives last week, he wouldn't be in hospital, but probably still have Covid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

She basically admitted the restrictions don’t have much effect and there’s no money to go any further. 
Quite surprised she said it but it’s welcome. 
I would hope theres some serious "so was it worth the money and what damage will blowing this money on this nonsense do down the line" from media and opposition.

There wont be like, but we live in hope.....
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ICTChris said:

From tomorrow, you don't need a confirmation PCR if you get a positive lateral flow and you have no symptoms.

What's the logic here?

No symptoms + test positive = you have covid

Symptoms and test positive with LFT you need to confirm.

If they're now fully trusting LFT's why would you need to go for a PCR if you have symptoms, have done an LFT and has returned positive?

Can get it if you have symptoms and return a negative LFT.  Go and get a more accurate PCR to verify.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...