Jump to content

Coronavirus (COVID-19)


Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, gav-ffc said:

ScotRail bodying a weirdo for taking pics of ransoms on public transport.

Hopefully that’s her texting the polis’ saying there’s a creepy fcuker on the train taking photos of her on their mobile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Left Back said:

That’s a given.  Not in dispute.  Hopefully the lassie in the photo has an ex named John that gives Gordon a leathering.

Curious to know if he’s actually breaking the law here though.

You can pretty freely take pictures of public in a public place (which I assume public transport would come under) as long as they aren't indecent. It could possibly considered harassment mind you.

https://www.blpawards.org/competition/photo-rights

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jan Vojáček said:

You can pretty freely take pictures of public in a public place (which I assume public transport would come under) as long as they aren't indecent. It could possibly considered harassment mind you.

https://www.blpawards.org/competition/photo-rights

 

5 minutes ago, Inanimate Carbon Rod said:

Dunno in terms of civil law and image rights but no nothing criminal.

Cheers.  I asked because I vaguely recall something in the news recently about smart doorbells taking photos without consent and the courts ruling it unlawful.  Didn’t pay a huge amount of attention to it right enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Left Back said:

 

Cheers.  I asked because I vaguely recall something in the news recently about smart doorbells taking photos without consent and the courts ruling it unlawful.  Didn’t pay a huge amount of attention to it right enough.

Pretty sure that headline didn't reflect the full story, they did have a Ring doorbell but the CCTV cameras were more of a problem than the Ring. Don't recall seeing that a Ring doorbell was by itself unlawful

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, ddfg said:

Pretty sure that headline didn't reflect the full story, they did have a Ring doorbell but the CCTV cameras were more of a problem than the Ring. Don't recall seeing that a Ring doorbell was by itself unlawful

It was the ring doorbell that was the main issue, although the camera was also ring.  It was recording the neighbours garden both visual and audio and although the activation area is configurable, the capture area is not.  It was found to be in breach of GDPR and harassment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...