Jump to content

Coronavirus (COVID-19)


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Left Back said:

While I don’t disagree we’ve been dreadful this is simplistic.  Are all these countries measuring death by Covid in the same way?

As per link - stats complied by Oxford Uni.  

If we take excess deaths as gospel then we have to accept that no one died of Covid in Norway last year as their excess deaths actually fell. 

Clearly a combination of the two will provide the correct answer. But has been the case throughout - it's easy to produce a graph to defend just about any position with regards to Covid.

Except to prove that it was over as a crisis last autumn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As per link - stats complied by Oxford Uni.  
If we take excess deaths as gospel then we have to accept that no one died of Covid in Norway last year as their excess deaths actually fell. 
Clearly a combination of the two will provide the correct answer. But has been the case throughout - it's easy to produce a graph to defend just about any position with regards to Covid.
Except to prove that it was over as a crisis last autumn.
I shared some time ago a link (can't find it now) showing how differently excess deaths can be calculated.

As a measure within a country, assuming the way it is measured is not radically altered, it can be used to make comparisons. Between countries is more problematic as you may not be comparing like with like.

Then you have the whole issue of which deaths are attributable to Covid-19.

I'm sure Todd could give you a critique of that.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Bob Mahelp
7 minutes ago, virginton said:

A cascade of tears and snotters from the Sridhars, Harvies etc. of the world now that their weirdo, zero Covid fantasy land is being drop kicked into the bin.

IMG-20200727-WA0002.jpg.35083b7005fb8547c11bad496d6e5715.jpg

  Reveal hidden contents

IMG-20200727-WA0002.jpg.35083b7005fb8547c11bad496d6e5715.jpg

 

Sridhar is in The Guardian agreeing (with reservations) about Johnson's roadmap. 

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/feb/22/england-covid-roadmap-lockdown-experts-view

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Ad Lib said:

The standard unit of time used to identify trends throughout the pandemic.

Ah yes. Differently counted covid deaths between 11th Jan - 17th Jan 2021 is definitely the focus...

It's quite a shock you didn't get elected with such zingers in your arsenal.

Edited by Todd_is_God
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, PWL said:

The confidence on this thread placed in Johnson, statistically the worst leader in the western world in terms of deaths, is quite something.  

You mistake confidence for utter desperation. A year of separation from loved ones will do that to you.

If the leader up here could be anything more than hopelessly negative then folk might be less inclined to look towards the fat buffoon for some hope.

Edited by George Parr
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting to see what NS comes out with tomorrow considering what was done today. Probably just present the same data differently, maybe switch a couple of dates around by a week or so. Wow, what a genius. So glad we have her as our leader, we’re definitely better than England even though we did everything the same and made the same mistakes we did it better.

I can’t see her coming up with anything different or original and it better not be some over cautious nonsense. Maybe tiered system?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, PWL said:

As per link - stats complied by Oxford Uni.  

If we take excess deaths as gospel then we have to accept that no one died of Covid in Norway last year as their excess deaths actually fell. 

Clearly a combination of the two will provide the correct answer. But has been the case throughout - it's easy to produce a graph to defend just about any position with regards to Covid.

Except to prove that it was over as a crisis last autumn.

So in the absence of a yes I have to assume you agree it’s a no then.  Oxford may have compiled the stats but each individual country measures this in different ways.

You can show anything you want with individual statistics.  It doesn’t necessarily mean you’re arriving at a fact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Steven W said:

Yes. Johnson has went big and bold, but with necessary and sensible caveats.

Sturgeon has a track record of being very careful and cautious. Tomorrow is an opportunity for her to lift the mood of the nation. The vaccines are going to be a big success, so she should act accordingly with the road map.

I don't know if she will make her move tomorrow but she knows the prize for winning this race. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Donathan said:

Officially the plan is end of July but looking at those leaked supply figures that @Todd_is_God posted and then allowing for second doses to take place 3 months after the first, we should be looking at all adults in the UK to be offered a vaccine by mid-May. Projected increase in the supply (Mainly driven by Oxford/AZ, but also partially by Moderna coming on line) means that we should be aiming for 600k-750k total doses per day UK wide from the start of March (Apart from a dip in mid-March)

Those "leaked supply figures" were made public by the Scottish government as part of a report which said that all JCVI groups 1-9 would receive both doses by the end of May. This was under the current 12 week dosing plan. It said absolutely nothing about people beyond that, but the implication was that these groups would take much longer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, craigkillie said:

Those "leaked supply figures" were made public by the Scottish government as part of a report which said that all JCVI groups 1-9 would receive both doses by the end of May. This was under the current 12 week dosing plan. It said absolutely nothing about people beyond that, but the implication was that these groups would take much longer.

99% of deaths come from those groups. There is no justification for continued disproportionate restrictions in order to keep the other 1% safe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those "leaked supply figures" were made public by the Scottish government as part of a report which said that all JCVI groups 1-9 would receive both doses by the end of May. This was under the current 12 week dosing plan. It said absolutely nothing about people beyond that, but the implication was that these groups would take much longer.

Those numbers go far, far beyond the JCVI 1-9, even allowing for second doses
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...