Jump to content

Coronavirus (COVID-19)


Recommended Posts

When he gave the example at 10% I thought he was going to say up to 50% or above.
It could maybe possibly go up 3%.
What's the point in announcing that. Its scare tactics.

Probably so the public don’t demand a return to the tiers, they might say “we were at Tier x in October when our cases and hospital capacity was the same as now so put us back”. Now the government cwn say ah but this is 30% more deadly
But todd is right this will backfire massively on these clowns because they can’t think of anything more than the immediate consequences. Side effects don’t cross their mind
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's right handy for some that clear reductions in infection rates have timed exactly with an new and more deadly variant. Wonder what it will be when we can all see hospital numbers going down....

Perhaps Random Guys covid that gives you aids will get the public airing none of us expected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, craigkillie said:

Are these two accounts verified as being good sources run by people who know what they're talking about? It's important that just because the media are scaremongering people don't fall into the trap of believing anyone who says things to the contrary - that's what made "Professor" Karl Sikora prominent for a wee while.

They seem to be promoting aspects which are positive - e.g the vaccines still work, vaccination numbers are on the increase and highlights stories and opinion pieces which don’t get hyped up.

The fact checker especially was really useful in debunking the likes of the half baked dramatic story coming out of Israel earlier this week.

One of the worst things people can do is to follow too many scientists on there and get dragged into the minutae of the complexities of vaccines and immune systems desperately looking for signs of hope - I’ve done this before and it does absolutely nothing for your mental health.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, No_Problemo said:

Just to wind everyone up.... Devi now saying by this time next year to be back to our normal daily lives! 
 

Really had to post this on here to stop me exploding in some kind of twitter rage. 


So we have a professor of virology saying that we need to keep the lockdown in place.
Can we have an QAnon, anti-covid bam saying it's all fake to balance it out?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, MuckleMoo said:

By all means tell the public if the virus is becoming more deadly but can they at least wait until they have the actual evidence to prove it, rather than this anecdotal bullshit

It’s because they need to do more research and evidence-gathering, the studies take time.

The problem is whilst this happens, a potentially more deadly variant is spreading so they are warning us and letting us know so we understand why the restrictions remain so tight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trying to stay positive but it's really difficult when you've got experts trying to push the view that there should be f**k all to look forward to in the coming months when we don't even know what they're gonna look like. 

Beginning to get scunnered.

Edited by Louis Litt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To quote Mark Corrigan;  this dynamic could go on indefinitely.

Cases and deaths start to drop due to lockdown and the vaccines, so they announce a new variant. 
 

Then WM and the SG shit themselves, without any actual data, and we’re in lockdown for months and months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Snafu said:

It's well over a month since they announced they were aware of it.

What have they been doing...............?

Gathering the data they have just talked about. Looking at rates of transmission and deaths will be a study over a period of time and a few weeks of data aren’t enough to see a firm new trend in rates and know they aren’t just outliers.

Edited by Jambomo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Putting my tin foil hat firmly on here but it's almost as if, what with cases falling, that the new variant being more transmissible has turned out to be a crock of shit (or at least not as transmissible as made out) so they have to move onto something else to keep up "compliance".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, anotherchance said:

 

Would this be the same Neil Ferguson whose back of a fag packet 'model' went for half a million deaths last spring and who completely screwed up on the Foot and Mouth outbreak as well?

This is how he should be dealt with in the corridors of government.

a0VfzmH5fSHJ.gif.b792726341b4ebc2a59650b8983e1460.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Todd_is_God said:

130% of a small number is still a small number anyway.

Exactly. 

I don't see what the problem is here. If the modelling had shown that there was no increase in lethality we'd expect them to report it - and they would, after all they reported initially that they didn't think there would be. 

There's a danger that all bad news is just discounted as fear porn, whereas any hint of positive news is trumpeted as the way it will be - look at Whitty's comments yesterday re restrictions. Neither stance is particularly scientific or rational, and just further evidence that this is now ideological and barely anyone is interested in facts or truth - people are only interested in what confirms what they already believe. 

Edited by madwullie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, PWL said:

 

My twenty years of being a anti social freak has been good practice.

 Didn’t watch it but this ‘announcement’ is scaremongering try and get more people to comply? 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's obvious the new variant is more powerful given the massive spikes and hospital capacity being challenged, and the wider age range. That can't be explained by Christmas alone, but the infection rate has been dropping nearly as quickly as it rose, and hopefully the hospitalisation and ICU rates will soon follow, and vaccination will prevent another spike. Back to tiers by the end of February and normality by late summer is my bet. Worst that could happen is we'll need another jag in the autumn, like we do every year with the flu.

Edited by welshbairn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheScarf said:

The mainstream UK media are fucking arseholes. Knowing that the lowest common denominator lap up everything they tell us and that 70% of us will be dead from COVID within 18 months.

It's been said before. If headlines like that drove 100 people to suicide but also sold 100 more papers, that's what they'll go with rather than any positive story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something I've been considering lately is that while younger people may get vaccinated this year, they'll probably not bother doing it routinely if it does become a yearly thing alongside flu jabs. Unless of course it remains a necessity for travelling etc longer term.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...