Jump to content

Coronavirus (COVID-19)


Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, djchapsticks said:

More shite - apparently this was always going to be the case to be locked down until summer.

It's fucking January.

We were told that opening for 5 days over Xmas would 'lead to 4 weeks lockdown' and now apparently that was reduced to 1 day opening which is leading to around 5-6 months.

image.thumb.png.986cfa7163938d0c1d37e6a1588f9e0b.png

 

Once the NHS is no longer at critical levels, this chatter needs to get in the fucking bin. 

These 'zero covid at all costs' fuckers should not be given airtime.

Yep.

The big difference between this lockdown and the first is the presence of a vaccine.

Yet somehow, this one feels like its gearing up to last a lot longer.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Steven W said:

Yep.

The big difference between this lockdown and the first is the presence of a vaccine.

Yet somehow, this one feels like its gearing up to last a lot longer.

 

Heads should be on pikes for any suggestions longer than 2 week rolling reviews.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Steven W said:

Yep.

The big difference between this lockdown and the first is the presence of a vaccine.

Yet somehow, this one feels like its gearing up to last a lot longer.

 

They are spooked by the supposedly increased R of the B117 variant. Really depends on how much increased transmission there actually is...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Snafu said:

Yep! agree

I'm sure there's an overly dedicated amateur specialist out there that has put together a family trees for the different viruses.

Are zero covid fantasists really that relevant in the grand scheme of things?

They won't decide or think for us the population of this country what is an acceptable level when it comes to new infections and deaths.

Yes when one of them in particular, Devi Sridhar, has NS's ear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, djchapsticks said:

More shite - apparently this was always going to be the case to be locked down until summer.

It's fucking January.

We were told that opening for 5 days over Xmas would 'lead to 4 weeks lockdown' and now apparently that was reduced to 1 day opening which is leading to around 5-6 months.

image.thumb.png.986cfa7163938d0c1d37e6a1588f9e0b.png

 

Once the NHS is no longer at critical levels, this chatter needs to get in the fucking bin. 

These 'zero covid at all costs' fuckers should not be given airtime.

Early studies in Israel suggest transmission IS reduced by 33% after 14 days for the Pfizer vaccine. Small sample size of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, djchapsticks said:

More shite - apparently this was always going to be the case to be locked down until summer.

It's fucking January.

We were told that opening for 5 days over Xmas would 'lead to 4 weeks lockdown' and now apparently that was reduced to 1 day opening which is leading to around 5-6 months.

image.thumb.png.986cfa7163938d0c1d37e6a1588f9e0b.png

 

Once the NHS is no longer at critical levels, this chatter needs to get in the fucking bin. 

These 'zero covid at all costs' fuckers should not be given airtime.

The way the arse fell out of the numbers last Spring clearly caught, at least the SG, by surprise.

With the fact that we already have a vaccine, and are in lockdown already, there's no reason to suspect them to do the same this year. They are, afterall, already going down.

Edited by Todd_is_God
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, djchapsticks said:

More shite - apparently this was always going to be the case to be locked down until summer.

It's fucking January.

We were told that opening for 5 days over Xmas would 'lead to 4 weeks lockdown' and now apparently that was reduced to 1 day opening which is leading to around 5-6 months.

image.thumb.png.986cfa7163938d0c1d37e6a1588f9e0b.png

 

Once the NHS is no longer at critical levels, this chatter needs to get in the fucking bin. 

These 'zero covid at all costs' fuckers should not be given airtime.

Always amusing when they say the government needs a long term strategy and then never elaborate on what that might look like. Maybe they just don't like the answer (vaccinate the population and bin the restrictions). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Snafu said:

Has there been any move towards a zero covid strategy from the Scottish Government?

No, but It's largely irrelevant for now as we are miles away from that. I'm sure that chatter will start once we near summer, as the likes of Sridhar warn about repeating "the mistakes" of last summer, without considering A that we have a vaccine and B, that the real mistakes were in keeping everything closed as long as they did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Marshmallo said:

Aye, was it not also the case that first dose only seemed like it wasn't nearly as good as advertised though? 

I guess that's a concern. A strategy of spacing doses out to broaden the number of folk getting at least one looks smart when Pfizer are telling you it has a 90% efficiacy rate after one and 95% after 2.

If it's only 52% efficient after one dose and with no data on how that cuts transmission, then Tony Blair, with his intervention in that debate, may have served to screw the country one more time, as it will take far longer to start to generate the kind of results Israel are seeing as they aren't doing 12 week spacings...

Edited by renton
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, renton said:

They are spooked by the supposedly increased R of the B117 variant. Really depends on how much increased transmission there actually is...

Wouldn't be surprised in all honesty if it's hardly any.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As the effectiveness of any vaccine is dependent on the immune system of the recipient this could take longer than some (including me) had hoped.

We are rightly targeting the most vulnerable to give them some level of protection but even if the vaccines all have a protection rate of about 90% thats not going to be the hit rate in this older or more vulnerable group, the group most likely to end up in hospital. Thus maybe 15% to 20% of this group could end up in hospital with Covid.

Hopefully then as we move down the groups the effectiveness will then improve, transmission fall and then restrictions end.

The acceptable level of deaths will also be countered by the fact that some of these people would have had other conditions which take up beds in the NHS. Id guess there will be less heart attacks , less cancer cases etc.

The results possibly mean a reduction in life expectancy for everyone but we cannot all be locked up for ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, renton said:

Aye, was it not also the case that first dose only seemed like it wasn't nearly as good as advertised though? 

I guess that's a concern. A strategy of spacing doses out to broaden the number of folk getting at least one looks smart when Pfizer are telling you it has a 90% efficiacy rate after one and 95% after 2.

If it's only 52% efficient after one dose and with no data on how that cuts transmission, then Tony Blair, with his intervention in that debate, may have served to screw the country one more time, as it will take far longer to start to generate the kind of results Israel are seeing as they aren't doing 12 week spacings...

No. It wasn't that effective until the third week after being administered (though 52% after one week is not dreadful).

In essence, it was the "ZoMg tEh vAcCiNe dOeSn'T WoRk" type of article that was entirely predictable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Snafu said:

I've not seen for what reason why Pfizer have been reducing the deliveries of the vaccine.

I see Italy are threatening them with legal action.

Surely supply must meet demand here unless there is a problem in the manufacturing or they simply can't keep up?

Because people told them they could get more from what they were delivering than they were paying for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Todd_is_God said:

Wouldn't be surprised in all honesty if it's hardly any.

I honestly wouldn't either, but the crux of it will be how it effects numbers in lockdown, rather than during the busiest retail period of the year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think after approaching a year, and three (hopefully soon to be four) vaccines on the go, people could do with some hope and optimism in life.
But not false hope. The truth is sometimes hard to take but sugar coating stuff like this helps no one. If the organisers of these events think it's remotely possible they will delay a decision. Clearly Glastonbury organisers didn't.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...