Jump to content

Clyde V Celtic


Romeo

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, Highlandmagyar 2nd Tier said:

There is no conviction in a civil court. Although he seemed to have misdeamenoured.

What the f**k is wrong with you???

If you're somehow mollified by the fact that a court ruled that he had only "probably" raped a woman, then please stay away from women.

The defence of this rapist is beneath contempt. Tribalism at its worst.

Edited by GordonS
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Pride Of The Clyde said:

FFS a Celtic fan taking the moral high ground over sex offences but let's not forget our player had no case to answer, can you say the same?

Any way Fcuk off .

He didn't have "no case to answer". That's a finding that a court would make. The Crown Office said they had insufficient evidence to prosecute. A civil court ruled that he is a rapist on the balance of probabilities.

Trying to pretend anything less than that is pretty disturbing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What the f**k is wrong with you???
If you're somehow mollified by the fact that a court ruled that he had only "probably" raped a women, then please stay away from women.
The defence of this rapist is beneath contempt. Tribalism at its worst.
Spot on.

Anyone who defends this cretin and his pal really is OFTW .
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, GordonS said:

What the f**k is wrong with you???

If you're somehow mollified by the fact that a court ruled that he had only "probably" raped a woman, then please stay away from women.

The defence of this rapist is beneath contempt. Tribalism at its worst.

Where am I defending him? I only stated a fact. Time to untwist your frillies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...