doulikefish Posted September 14, 2021 Share Posted September 14, 2021 12 hours ago, williemillersmoustache said: Think I just heard that one of the reasons to dismiss Andrews lawyers are arguing is the existence of a pre-existing settlement. Which is as good as a confession. Yip seemingly had a pre existing agreement from a person he claims to have never met sounds perfectly innocent 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottsdad Posted September 14, 2021 Share Posted September 14, 2021 12 hours ago, Bully Wee Villa said: It isn't a settlement with him, it's a settlement with Weinstein. No idea how that exonerates Sweaty Andy. When I first heard that, my thought was that there was something in this settlement (ie details of various activities) that had a bearing. That suggests two things to me - that there is some mention in the earlier settlement that Andrew is innocent in some way (possibly inserted by Epstein to insulate Andrew from future actions just like this one). And that Andrew knows this is in the "confidential" settlement. So long as there is some hint or mention in the Epstein settlement that Andrew is innocent and the girl has signed it, that's their shield. I imagine that this defence has been planned for years and years. Why else would Andrew want the earlier settlement with somebody else included here? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted September 14, 2021 Share Posted September 14, 2021 3 hours ago, Sergeant Wilson said: I wouldn't. Give me a technicality or a not proven any time. You’d be found guilty and get 30 years. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Wilson Posted September 14, 2021 Share Posted September 14, 2021 1 hour ago, Granny Danger said: You’d be found guilty and get 30 years. Exactly! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Ferrino Posted September 14, 2021 Share Posted September 14, 2021 15 hours ago, BFTD said: One of the benefits of being the Duke of York is that there'll be records of literally every move you've made since birth. If one of us had to prove we were in a Pizza Express twenty years ago, we might struggle without obsessive record-keeping, but there'll be all sorts of government records about where he was, who he was with, etc. And that's before you get on to the eyewitnesses who'll be coming forward to tell of the day that a surprisingly arid son of Her Majesty walked into their place of work/local shitty pizza shop. Open and shut case, lads. Nothing to see here. He also has a ready made army of thick inbred pitchfork welders. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GordonD Posted September 15, 2021 Share Posted September 15, 2021 9 hours ago, Tony Ferrino said: He also has a ready made army of thick inbred pitchfork welders. Though they're fed up being marched up and down hills for no apparent reason. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted September 15, 2021 Share Posted September 15, 2021 9 hours ago, Tony Ferrino said: He also has a ready made army of thick inbred pitchfork welders. Looks more like grinding than welding tbh. He’d probably prefer that. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
btb Posted September 15, 2021 Share Posted September 15, 2021 On 14/09/2021 at 08:30, BFTD said: One of the benefits of being the Duke of York is that there'll be records of literally every move you've made since birth. If one of us had to prove we were in a Pizza Express twenty years ago, we might struggle without obsessive record-keeping, but there'll be all sorts of government records about where he was, who he was with, etc. And that's before you get on to the eyewitnesses who'll be coming forward to tell of the day that a surprisingly arid son of Her Majesty walked into their place of work/local shitty pizza shop. Open and shut case, lads. Nothing to see here. Yeah I said something similar near the start of the thread almost two years ago, there's been plenty of time to prove he wasn't there, like others have suggested an out of court settlement beckons... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Priti priti priti Patel Posted September 16, 2021 Share Posted September 16, 2021 On 10/09/2021 at 22:28, Melanius Mullarkey said: Good news though. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spousal_privilege 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suspect Device Posted September 16, 2021 Share Posted September 16, 2021 So is the beast of Buckingham Palace going to be the star of the next series of banged up abroad? <Insert Keenan gif> 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin_Nevis Posted September 25, 2021 Share Posted September 25, 2021 Well, this could get interesting. Nonce Andrew's lawyers have accepted the papers as being served. Papers Served 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted September 25, 2021 Share Posted September 25, 2021 18 minutes ago, Day of the Lords said: Well, this could get interesting. Nonce Andrew's lawyers have accepted the papers as being served. Papers Served They probably realised they had no option and thought accepting service had an element of damage limitation, though it’s probably far too late for that. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin_Nevis Posted September 25, 2021 Share Posted September 25, 2021 14 minutes ago, Granny Danger said: They probably realised they had no option and thought accepting service had an element of damage limitation, though it’s probably far too late for that. Options now are: Out of court settlement An "accident" No way is that c**t standing up in a courtroom, imo. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted September 25, 2021 Share Posted September 25, 2021 8 minutes ago, Day of the Lords said: Options now are: Out of court settlement An "accident" No way is that c**t standing up in a courtroom, imo. If HRH and The Royals PLC pay her off with our fucking money that may just be the tipping point required to finally bin the monarch as head of state and sweep these grifting b*****ds into the sea. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted September 25, 2021 Share Posted September 25, 2021 16 minutes ago, Day of the Lords said: Options now are: Out of court settlement An "accident" No way is that c**t standing up in a courtroom, imo. I’ve said before he might get Dianaed. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted September 25, 2021 Share Posted September 25, 2021 5 minutes ago, williemillersmoustache said: If HRH and The Royals PLC pay her off with our fucking money that may just be the tipping point required to finally bin the monarch as head of state and sweep these grifting b*****ds into the sea. That’s not going to happen, we both know that. Forelock tugging servility is too ingrained amongst the English populace. Will certainly make any argument to ditch them as head of state in an Independent Scotland far easier though. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted September 25, 2021 Share Posted September 25, 2021 1 minute ago, Granny Danger said: That’s not going to happen, we both know that. Forelock tugging servility is too ingrained amongst the English populace. Will certainly make any argument to ditch them as head of state in an Independent Scotland far easier though. That'll do for me. BTW what are the Barnet consequentials for noncing pay offs? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inanimate Carbon Rod Posted September 25, 2021 Share Posted September 25, 2021 3 hours ago, Day of the Lords said: Options now are: Out of court settlement An "accident" No way is that c**t standing up in a courtroom, imo. Theres not a fucking chance in hell he attends court and my understanding is that he cannot be made to, unless they had a slam dunk win where he could do his salmond into Westminster walk. Agree a settlement is likely but thats gonna hurt the monarchy, exciting times indeed. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Connolly Posted September 25, 2021 Share Posted September 25, 2021 3 hours ago, williemillersmoustache said: That'll do for me. BTW what are the Barnet consequentials for noncing pay offs? This is the type of content that needs tweeted for maximum effect, rather than posted on P&B 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miguel Sanchez Posted October 2, 2021 Share Posted October 2, 2021 Money well spent, I'm sure. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.