Jump to content

Prince Andrew BBC


D.A.F.C

Recommended Posts

When Prince Baldy married Kate, an American colleague of mine took the day off work so she could watch the television coverage. Given that her Facebook posts suggest she's virulently opposed to the concept of taxation, I asked her why, when the British poor were being crushed by austerity, such colossal public expenditure on something so unnecessary didn't bother her. Predictably, like most conservatives, she was just fine with tax dollars being spent on the rich - it's only when they're spent to help the poor that her Randian principles are invoked.
"But don't you think it's just wonderful that a commoner can marry into the Royal Family?" she gushed.
Well no. No, I don't. The very word "commoner" is disgusting. For me, it sums up everything that's wrong with our society and culture. This notion that rich people are definition, better than the rest of us and therefore entitled to special treatment. Not because they work hard, or do good with what they've been given, or are decent human beings. Not because they've done a damn thing to deserve it, but just because they were born rich. Laws, responsibilities, social norms of behaviour, none of those apply.
Until we as a society move past this hero worship of the rich, our obsession with celebrity, our unwillingness to question the notion that rich people are our betters, then these vermin will continue to treat "commoners" as their playthings. And they'll continue to get away with it.
Sadly, I don't see things changing any time soon. 
 
Whilst you are right, and I have used the sites colour beaaed reaction system to indicate my approval, I would offer one slight foil to that, and its rare I give social media any credit but this is an example where it does do good. No one is above negative publicity anymore. It allows a tidal wave of pressure to be applied until entities like the BBC are compelled to put it into the mainstream, which gives us the weekends interview. The guy in question put on the spot, and making an arse of himself.

Of course on the flip side it can lead to witch hunts and trial by media which isnt great, but if a scandal is big enough, there are less hiding places and cover ups available than ever before because literally everyone has a voice
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, pozbaird said:

If the Americans want him to go over there and testify under oath, maybe we could do a swap deal and we get, oh, let’s say, a diplomat’s wife who killed someone then fcuked off to the States under their husband’s diplomatic immunity.

 

Unfortunately these "reciprocal" arrangements between us and the US only work in one direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Florentine_Pogen said:

That was an interesting read. These *ahem* concerns have been ongoing for a considerable time. And most of the recent "revelations" are actually contained in that article.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LongTimeLurker said:

Just watched the interview after seeing this thread. Suspect he was expecting the interviewer to be much more deferential. Instead she asks questions like a prosecutor. I suspect she is unlikely to ever appear on any New Years Honours lists.

They should have got Si Ferry

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...