hearthammer Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 8 hours ago, sjc said: True. The melting temperature of steel is 2750°C, far higher than the burning temperature of jet fuel. Steel will lose half its strength at 650°C. Worth noting though, that only 3 structural steel frame buildings have ever collapsed in this mode due to fire.......all of which happened on 9/11. This. 9/11 was an inside job by the american govt. Bassas. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hearthammer Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 If you have time, watch this then see if your view of either "it was terrorists" or "it was those Bush-led bassas" can be changed or revisited. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sugna Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melanius Mullarkey Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 1 hour ago, Miguel Sanchez said: Let me guess, if the World Trade Center's made entirely of concrete, the planes just bounce off it? Dont be so stupid. I was thinking more along the lines of uncooked pasta glued together with scrambeled eggs that had been left to dry for a week or two. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hearthammer Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 Dorlomin, did you actually watch the video, or are you of the "official" opinion that it was those bad Al-Quada guys ?? I will assume you believe the McCanns had nada to do with Maddy's disappearance and that they're being unfairly investigated by sources outwith good ol' blighty's government official stance ?? Each to their own 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotThePars Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 Between Jeffrey Epstein and 9/11 those Saudis love to sponsor controversial flights on the New York skyline. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 (edited) 10 hours ago, sjc said: True. The melting temperature of steel is 2750°C, far higher than the burning temperature of jet fuel. Steel will lose half its strength at 650°C. Worth noting though, that only 3 structural steel frame buildings have ever collapsed in this mode due to fire.......all of which happened on 9/11. Out interest, how many half a kilometre high structural steel frame buildings have caught on fire to that extent? Leaving out being hit by a 150 ton object hitting it at 500 mph obviously. Edited October 25, 2019 by welshbairn 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted October 25, 2019 Author Share Posted October 25, 2019 8 minutes ago, welshbairn said: Out interest, how many half a kilometre high structural steel frame buildings have caught on fire to that extent? A 350m high one caught fire in Dubai in 2017. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 2 minutes ago, sjc said: A 350m high one caught fire in Dubai in 2017. So 2 out of three collapsed so far. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted October 25, 2019 Author Share Posted October 25, 2019 2 minutes ago, welshbairn said: So 2 out of three collapsed so far. There's been more: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skyscraper_fire Plus Building 7 collapsed on 9/11 also but just last month an inquiry debunked the "official" narrative as to why. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.globalresearch.ca/official-story-collapse-wtc-building-7-lies-ruins/5688141/amp 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 2 minutes ago, sjc said: Building 7 collapsed on 9/11 also but just last month an inquiry debunked the "official" narrative as to why. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.globalresearch.ca/official-story-collapse-wtc-building-7-lies-ruins/5688141/amp Quote This is the first scientific investigation of the collapse of the building. Think I'll give it a miss tbh. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted October 25, 2019 Author Share Posted October 25, 2019 Just now, welshbairn said: Think I'll give it a miss tbh. It is a bit dry.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 Just now, sjc said: It is a bit dry.... And not entirely honest. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted October 25, 2019 Author Share Posted October 25, 2019 3 minutes ago, welshbairn said: And not entirely honest. You do realise that this is just an article about the report? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dorlomin Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 8 minutes ago, sjc said: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.globalresearch.ca/ https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Globalresearch Quote Globalresearch is an "anti-Western" website that can't distinguish between serious analysis and discreditable junk — and so publishes both. It's basically the moonbat equivalent to Infowars or WND. While some of GlobalResearch's articles discuss legitimate humanitarian concerns, its view of science, economics, and geopolitics is conspiracist — if something goes wrong, the Jews West didit! The site has long been a crank magnet: If you disagree with "Western" sources on 9/11, or HAARP, or vaccines, or H1N1, or climate change, or anything published by the "mainstream" media, then GlobalResearch is guaranteed to have a page you will love. Genocide denial, anti vaxxer, HAARP, Charlie Hebo attack was a false flag, Zionists run America, Chemtrails, pro homeopathy are just some of the delights that website pushes. Nuttier than squirrel shite. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted October 25, 2019 Author Share Posted October 25, 2019 3 minutes ago, dorlomin said: https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Globalresearch Genocide denial, anti vaxxer, HAARP, Charlie Hebo attack was a false flag, Zionists run America, Chemtrails, pro homeopathy are just some of the delights that website pushes. Nuttier than squirrel shite. Like I said, that was just an article on the actual report. Try this link: http://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dorlomin Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 3 minutes ago, sjc said: Like I said, that was just an article on the actual report. Try this link: http://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7 Quote Designated reviewers external to UAF and Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth will also review the report during this period. Commenters are asked to send their comments in an attached PDF or Word document to publiccomment@AE911Truth.org. So "Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth" found something suspicious. Blow me down with a feather. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dorlomin Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 I doubt many believe most of this bollox but here is something for those who are interested in why most experts believe the mainstream story. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 (edited) 37 minutes ago, sjc said: Like I said, that was just an article on the actual report. Try this link: http://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7 Or this. https://www.nist.gov/publications/final-report-collapse-world-trade-center-building-7-federal-building-and-fire-safety-0?pub_id=861610 Edited October 25, 2019 by welshbairn 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A.F.C Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 It really is amazing that so many people believe that there was some sort of real conspiracy to what happened to the towers structurally as a result of the planes hitting them. For me it hides the question of how a bunch of disorganised terrorists pulled this off. It certainly suited the hawkish government of the time. Not saying they were behind it but perhaps turned a blind eye on it? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.