Benjamin_Nevis Posted March 30, 2023 Share Posted March 30, 2023 7 minutes ago, BTFD said: Aye, I've been wondering if "Wingman" is some kind of derisory term for a vulnerable group, considering what "Dawson Park Boy" turned out to be. It's a nickname for far right extremists, which is amusingly suitable. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BFTD Posted March 30, 2023 Share Posted March 30, 2023 4 minutes ago, Benjamin_Nevis said: It's a nickname for far right extremists, which is amusingly suitable. Well, whaddaya know. Every day's a school day. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RiG Posted March 30, 2023 Share Posted March 30, 2023 7 hours ago, Goomba said: Of course I red-dotted it. Your "facts" are nonsense. I support him? Care to back this up? It takes literally seconds to find a plethora of articles which confirm all of what @DeeTillEhDeh has said which begs the question why you support the guy when all of this kind of stuff is very much in the public domain. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dirty dingus Posted March 30, 2023 Share Posted March 30, 2023 Manky jaicket is a fud. He shat it when he was challenged on trying to commit a terrorist act against an Indy march and confronted about his right wing beliefs by some video blogger. The dodgy c**t is the skinhead bloke that booted a pregnant woman and turns up at anti trans protests all in the sake of the union, funny that these folks don't seem to be watched by the polis and even weirder is that he seems to be matey with Indy supporting blokes like Manny Singh. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goomba Posted March 30, 2023 Share Posted March 30, 2023 58 minutes ago, RiG said: It takes literally seconds to find a plethora of articles which confirm all of what @DeeTillEhDeh has said which begs the question why you support the guy when all of this kind of stuff is very much in the public domain. Can only assume you misread my post? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeTillEhDeh Posted March 30, 2023 Share Posted March 30, 2023 43 minutes ago, Goomba said: Can only assume you misread my post? And you didn't answer mine. I'll make it easy for you. Which part of the post you red-dotted did you disagree with? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lichtgilphead Posted March 30, 2023 Share Posted March 30, 2023 11 hours ago, CarrbridgeSaintee said: I still can't find any Wings blog post detailing how he came to the 47% Who cares? It's still obviously wrong. Picking and choosing polls from various pollsters to suit your argument does not constitute any sort of reliable statistical analysis. He doesn't even tell us whether his 47% includes "don't knows" or not! Here's a link to every indy poll since before the 2014 referendum. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_on_Scottish_independence if it means so much to you to prove him correct, you do the analysis (Hint - you won't be able to!) Incidentally, I'm 100% sure that you are a previously multibanned alias. I don't think I'll bother to show my working either. Go on, prove me wrong. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarrbridgeSaintee Posted March 30, 2023 Share Posted March 30, 2023 12 minutes ago, lichtgilphead said: Who cares? It's still obviously wrong. Picking and choosing polls from various pollsters to suit your argument does not constitute any sort of reliable statistical analysis. He doesn't even tell us whether his 47% includes "don't knows" or not! Here's a link to every indy poll since before the 2014 referendum. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_on_Scottish_independence if it means so much to you to prove him correct, you do the analysis (Hint - you won't be able to!) Incidentally, I'm 100% sure that you are a previously multibanned alias. I don't think I'll bother to show my working either. Go on, prove me wrong. I’m not so sure it’s wrong, and don’t care enough to do analysis. You’re the one that brought it up, so if you really want to prove it then just send him an email asking where he got 47% from. Also, there’s no need to be so hostile. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted March 30, 2023 Share Posted March 30, 2023 11 minutes ago, CarrbridgeSaintee said: don’t care enough to do analysis. But you keep praising his journalistic credentials nevertheless. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lichtgilphead Posted March 30, 2023 Share Posted March 30, 2023 15 minutes ago, CarrbridgeSaintee said: I’m not so sure it’s wrong, and don’t care enough to do analysis. You’re the one that brought it up, so if you really want to prove it then just send him an email asking where he got 47% from. Also, there’s no need to be so hostile. Err, it was you that challenged the board to point out something untrue that Campbell had posted. I did, and provided figures to back up my claims. You then came away with some crap about him picking and choosing his dates & figures. I pointed out that this approach was unlikely to stand up to scrutiny and invited you to validate his figures. You say you don't care enough to do so. I would suggest that that's because you know that Campbell was posting nonsense. Incidentally, pointing out facts is not equal to hostility. Are you suggesting that you're not a multibanned alias? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BFTD Posted March 30, 2023 Share Posted March 30, 2023 5 hours ago, Benjamin_Nevis said: It's DAF's latest loser incarnation. Oh, you're right, it's that one who was always whining about people being hostile and aggressive (while being hostile and aggressive). Apologies to Oaksoft. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarrbridgeSaintee Posted March 30, 2023 Share Posted March 30, 2023 Sometimes if you think conversations are going nowhere, then it's best just to put the instigators on ignore. I'll review this at the end of April. What a bizarre last few posts. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lichtgilphead Posted March 30, 2023 Share Posted March 30, 2023 The return of the ever-expanding ignore list! What a time to be alive. 13 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin_Nevis Posted March 30, 2023 Share Posted March 30, 2023 1 hour ago, CarrbridgeSaintee said: Sometimes if you think conversations are going nowhere, then it's best just to put the instigators on ignore. I'll review this at the end of April. What a bizarre last few posts. Tragic stuff 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boo Khaki Posted March 30, 2023 Share Posted March 30, 2023 I'm sure The Free Speech Union must be keeping a waking vigil on this thread. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moses1924 Posted March 30, 2023 Share Posted March 30, 2023 12 minutes ago, Boo Khaki said: I'm sure The Free Speech Union must be keeping a waking vigil on this thread. this thread is almost enough to convince me free speech is a bad thing... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goomba Posted March 31, 2023 Share Posted March 31, 2023 13 hours ago, DeeTillEhDeh said: And you didn't answer mine. I'll make it easy for you. Which part of the post you red-dotted did you disagree with? First of all, you claimed I support him. As another poster said you claimed he was in the Orange, which he is not, and the fact you see this as a stick to beat him with shows your bigoted nature. "Nasty piece of work"? That's subjective, but given the nature of your posts I'd say "people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones" - maybe you should examine yourself first. "All round shitebag" - see above. Your post was just an attack based on your own personal prejudices rather than anything resembling logic or reason. -9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeTillEhDeh Posted March 31, 2023 Share Posted March 31, 2023 (edited) 20 minutes ago, Goomba said: First of all, you claimed I support him. As another poster said you claimed he was in the Orange, which he is not, and the fact you see this as a stick to beat him with shows your bigoted nature. "Nasty piece of work"? That's subjective, but given the nature of your posts I'd say "people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones" - maybe you should examine yourself first. "All round shitebag" - see above. Your post was just an attack based on your own personal prejudices rather than anything resembling logic or reason. The man is a self-proclaimed holocaust denier. The Orange Order also did pay him £2000 during the referendum campaign - that's a fact. You genuinely think that's not something to attack him with? Its absolutely clear you do support him by trying to defend him. And personal prejudices? That I get fucking annoyed that someone denies the Holocaust? That I hate fucking antisemitism? That's not prejudice that's the fucking the right thing to do. As for the false equivalence regards my own personal character - I'll treat that with the contempt it deserves. You are nothing but a poundland troll who needs to bugger off back and drink yer fucking puddle. Edited March 31, 2023 by DeeTillEhDeh 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarrbridgeSaintee Posted March 31, 2023 Share Posted March 31, 2023 Nice to see the thread continue to blossom. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DublinMagyar Posted March 31, 2023 Share Posted March 31, 2023 There are an awful lot of snowflakes among the proud boys of P 'n' B, are there not? 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.