KirkieRR Posted December 26, 2022 Share Posted December 26, 2022 Horrifically, it's by no means impossible and I'm sure the incompetent vain git himself is foremost in campaigning behind the scenes. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
btb Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 Grant Schapps cutting BJ out of this picture on his Twitter account. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StellarHibee Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 12 minutes ago, btb said: Grant Schapps cutting BJ out of this picture on his Twitter account. Well he's erased his own identify several times, so this must have been easy work. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MazzyStar Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KirkieRR Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 Is 'vaporised' the term from 1984? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
specsaver Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 9 minutes ago, KirkieRR said: Is 'vaporised' the term from 1984? Is "vaporised" not relating to Sean Connery at the end of "The Rock" 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Connolly Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 1 hour ago, specsaver said: Is "vaporised" not relating to Sean Connery at the end of "The Rock" 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tamthebam Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 On 10/01/2023 at 18:26, btb said: Grant Schapps cutting BJ out of this picture on his Twitter account. From three failed rockets in the photo to two. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted February 18 Share Posted February 18 Boris's new gaff. https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/85267206#/?channel=RES_BUY 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey Jo Jo Junior Shabadoo Posted February 18 Share Posted February 18 I’d like to know where someone who can’t afford a roll of wallpaper finds £4million for a house. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soapy FFC Posted February 18 Share Posted February 18 Would he be buying this if he hadn't been Prime Minister? It's almost like the point of being Prime Minister is to work to further personal prospects and wealth, rather than work to further a country's prospects and wealth. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suspect Device Posted February 26 Share Posted February 26 It used to be f**k business but now his catchphrase is f**k America. Some boy is Boris. Might have a bit of a drop in speaking invites if this gets well publicised. Boris in Biden row over ‘f*** America!’ outburst | The Independent 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurkst Posted March 2 Share Posted March 2 https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2023/mar/02/keir-starmer-considers-sue-gray-labour-chief-of-staff Sue Gray takes a job with Starmer. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GordonD Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 11 hours ago, Lurkst said: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2023/mar/02/keir-starmer-considers-sue-gray-labour-chief-of-staff Sue Gray takes a job with Starmer. And the Tories are complaining that it "undermines her report and the impartiality of the civil service". My irony detector has just exploded.. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paco Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 I think it’s a monumental own goal from Labour to be honest. Gives ammo to Tories and it’ll be twisted every which way possible. Obviously it doesn’t change the facts - Partygate was a thing because Boris Johnson and 10 Downing St had dozens of illegal gatherings. But when you look at the state of today’s Tory media front pages it’ll be hard to keep that narrative. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salvo Montalbano Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 1 hour ago, Paco said: I think it’s a monumental own goal from Labour to be honest. Gives ammo to Tories and it’ll be twisted every which way possible. Obviously it doesn’t change the facts - Partygate was a thing because Boris Johnson and 10 Downing St had dozens of illegal gatherings. But when you look at the state of today’s Tory media front pages it’ll be hard to keep that narrative. Yep, it's such a basic error by Labour. It doesn't matter what it is, it matters what it looks like (or looks like when viewed through a certain prism). Something that could have been done at any time and they've chosen to do it now. Baffling. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salt n Vinegar Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 Meanwhile, back at Westminster - "Boris Johnson may have misled Parliament over Partygate, MPs investigating his conduct say. Evidence strongly suggests breaches of coronavirus rules would have been "obvious" to Mr Johnson, the privileges committee said in an update." From https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-64836425 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paco Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 I don’t think the committee could realistically have used stronger language. He’s bang to rights, and is already using Sue Gray as a getout. Going full Trump by the look of it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leith Green Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 2 hours ago, Paco said: I think it’s a monumental own goal from Labour to be honest. Gives ammo to Tories and it’ll be twisted every which way possible. Obviously it doesn’t change the facts - Partygate was a thing because Boris Johnson and 10 Downing St had dozens of illegal gatherings. But when you look at the state of today’s Tory media front pages it’ll be hard to keep that narrative. Sure, because the "tory media front pages" were all super positive about Labour before Starmer hired Gray......... Storm in a tea cup stuff, nobody will care tomorrow. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salt n Vinegar Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 1 minute ago, Paco said: I don’t think the committee could realistically have used stronger language. He’s bang to rights, and is already using Sue Gray as a getout. Going full Trump by the look of it. LBC going for Bojo bigtime already, pointing out that his statement today is utter bollx. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.